What are some ways to increase precision or recall in machine learning?

What are some ways to increase precision or recall in machine learning?

What are some ways to increase precision or recall in machine learning?

What are some ways to Boost Precision and Recall in Machine Learning?

Sensitivity vs Specificity?

In machine learning, recall is the ability of the model to find all relevant instances in the data while precision is the ability of the model to correctly identify only the relevant instances. A high recall means that most relevant results are returned while a high precision means that most of the returned results are relevant. Ideally, you want a model with both high recall and high precision but often there is a trade-off between the two. In this blog post, we will explore some ways to increase recall or precision in machine learning.

What are some ways to increase precision or recall in machine learning?
What are some ways to increase precision or recall in machine learning?

There are two main ways to increase recall:

by increasing the number of false positives or by decreasing the number of false negatives. To increase the number of false positives, you can lower your threshold for what constitutes a positive prediction. For example, if you are trying to predict whether or not an email is spam, you might lower the threshold for what constitutes spam so that more emails are classified as spam. This will result in more false positives (emails that are not actually spam being classified as spam) but will also increase recall (more actual spam emails being classified as spam).

2023 AWS Certified Machine Learning Specialty (MLS-C01) Practice Exams
2023 AWS Certified Machine Learning Specialty (MLS-C01) Practice Exams

To decrease the number of false negatives,

you can increase your threshold for what constitutes a positive prediction. For example, going back to the spam email prediction example, you might raise the threshold for what constitutes spam so that fewer emails are classified as spam. This will result in fewer false negatives (actual spam emails not being classified as spam) but will also decrease recall (fewer actual spam emails being classified as spam).

What are some ways to increase precision or recall in machine learning?

There are two main ways to increase precision:

by increasing the number of true positives or by decreasing the number of true negatives. To increase the number of true positives, you can raise your threshold for what constitutes a positive prediction. For example, using the spam email prediction example again, you might raise the threshold for what constitutes spam so that fewer emails are classified as spam. This will result in more true positives (emails that are actually spam being classified as spam) but will also decrease precision (more non-spam emails being classified as spam).

To decrease the number of true negatives,

you can lower your threshold for what constitutes a positive prediction. For example, going back to the spam email prediction example once more, you might lower the threshold for what constitutes spam so that more emails are classified as spam. This will result in fewer true negatives (emails that are not actually spam not being classified as spam) but will also decrease precision (more non-spam emails being classified as spam).

What are some ways to increase precision or recall in machine learning?

To summarize,

there are a few ways to increase precision or recall in machine learning. One way is to use a different evaluation metric. For example, if you are trying to maximize precision, you can use the F1 score, which is a combination of precision and recall. Another way to increase precision or recall is to adjust the threshold for classification. This can be done by changing the decision boundary or by using a different algorithm altogether.

What are some ways to increase precision or recall in machine learning?

Sensitivity vs Specificity

In machine learning, sensitivity and specificity are two measures of the performance of a model. Sensitivity is the proportion of true positives that are correctly predicted by the model, while specificity is the proportion of true negatives that are correctly predicted by the model.

Google Colab For Machine Learning

State of the Google Colab for ML (October 2022)

Google introduced computing units, which you can purchase just like any other cloud computing unit you can from AWS or Azure etc. With Pro you get 100, and with Pro+ you get 500 computing units. GPU, TPU and option of High-RAM effects how much computing unit you use hourly. If you don’t have any computing units, you can’t use “Premium” tier gpus (A100, V100) and even P100 is non-viable.

Google Colab Pro+ comes with Premium tier GPU option, meanwhile in Pro if you have computing units you can randomly connect to P100 or T4. After you use all of your computing units, you can buy more or you can use T4 GPU for the half or most of the time (there can be a lot of times in the day that you can’t even use a T4 or any kinds of GPU). In free tier, offered gpus are most of the time K80 and P4, which performs similar to a 750ti (entry level gpu from 2014) with more VRAM.

For your consideration, T4 uses around 2, and A100 uses around 15 computing units hourly.
Based on the current knowledge, computing units costs for GPUs tend to fluctuate based on some unknown factor.

Considering those:

  1. For hobbyists and (under)graduate school duties, it will be better to use your own gpu if you have something with more than 4 gigs of VRAM and better than 750ti, or atleast purchase google pro to reach T4 even if you have no computing units remaining.
  2. For small research companies, and non-trivial research at universities, and probably for most of the people Colab now probably is not a good option.
  3. Colab Pro+ can be considered if you want Pro but you don’t sit in front of your computer, since it disconnects after 90 minutes of inactivity in your computer. But this can be overcomed with some scripts to some extend. So for most of the time Colab Pro+ is not a good option.

If you have anything more to say, please let me know so I can edit this post with them. Thanks!


In machine learning, precision and recall trade off against each other; increasing one often decreases the other. There is no single silver bullet solution for increasing either precision or recall; it depends on your specific use case which one is more important and which methods will work best for boosting whichever metric you choose. In this blog post, we explored some methods for increasing either precision or recall; hopefully this gives you a starting point for improving your own models!


What are some ways we can use machine learning and artificial intelligence for algorithmic trading in the stock market?

Machine Learning and Data Science Breaking News 2022 – 2023

  • [D] Startup vs Google for getting into reaserch
    by /u/No-Rest-7211 (Machine Learning) on July 24, 2024 at 3:43 pm

    Hi, for the past few years I've been seriously getting into machine learning. I've been working as a software engineer for the past few years and during that time I decided to do a masters in the field to get some more academic type knowledge. My small dream is getting a reaserch type job in the field. Sadly a PhD is not a possibility for me financially. Applying for machine learning jobs I've managed to get 2 offers. One is from a startup where I would work on inference and one is at Google where I would work on developing a cloud AI platform. Which path do you think yields more chance of jumping into reaserch one day? I am afraid that the startup might go bankrupt as sadly probably most AI startups will, and It's hard to evaluate how good their tech is as it's not public at this moment but it would probably be easier for me to help reaserchers there and maybe get my name on some papers On the other side Google would definetly be more financially stable, and from what I've heard switching teams is very common - do you think that it would be possible to get into AI reaserch team from an AI infrastructure team? submitted by /u/No-Rest-7211 [link] [comments]

  • [R] Scaling Diffusion Transformers to 16 Billion Parameters
    by /u/StartledWatermelon (Machine Learning) on July 24, 2024 at 3:12 pm

    TL;DR Adding Mixture-of-Experts into a Diffusion Transformer gets you an efficient and powerful model. Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.11633 Abstract: In this paper, we present DiT-MoE, a sparse version of the diffusion Transformer, that is scalable and competitive with dense networks while exhibiting highly optimized inference. The DiT-MoE includes two simple designs: shared expert routing and expert-level balance loss, thereby capturing common knowledge and reducing redundancy among the different routed experts. When applied to conditional image generation, a deep analysis of experts specialization gains some interesting observations: (i) Expert selection shows preference with spatial position and denoising time step, while insensitive with different class-conditional information; (ii) As the MoE layers go deeper, the selection of experts gradually shifts from specific spacial position to dispersion and balance. (iii) Expert specialization tends to be more concentrated at the early time step and then gradually uniform after half. We attribute it to the diffusion process that first models the low-frequency spatial information and then high-frequency complex information. Based on the above guidance, a series of DiT-MoE experimentally achieves performance on par with dense networks yet requires much less computational load during inference. More encouragingly, we demonstrate the potential of DiT-MoE with synthesized image data, scaling diffusion model at a 16.5B parameter that attains a new SoTA FID-50K score of 1.80 in 512×512 resolution settings. The project page: this https URL. Visual Abstract: https://preview.redd.it/cq6yoqoeched1.png?width=1135&format=png&auto=webp&s=1985119b5150c76bb9807f4df45d7bb44e02bd2a Visual Highlights: https://preview.redd.it/8xf8egk9dhed1.png?width=1109&format=png&auto=webp&s=6e25b12d9a89d78847945068469f83cb45ef1eab 1S, 2S and 4S in the middle panel refer to the number of shared experts MoE decreases training stability, but not catastrophically https://preview.redd.it/s6cchx2nehed1.png?width=983&format=png&auto=webp&s=c426ce2f1362bace2b4d3abef8d7e5607d0ff405 submitted by /u/StartledWatermelon [link] [comments]

  • [P] New registry for KitOps, an open source MLOps tool: Check out the preview (not gated)
    by /u/javafett (Machine Learning) on July 24, 2024 at 1:57 pm

    Hey everyone, Have you heard about KitOps? It's an open-source MLOps tool designed to streamline the handoff of AI projects across data science, app development, and SRE/DevOps teams. There's been a lot of excitement and adoption around KitOps, and just last week, it hit a milestone of 1k installs in a single week! One of the most requested features from KitOps users has been a purpose-built hub to host their ModelKits. Today, we're excited to share a sneak peek of what’s been developed. Check it out at jozu.ml. If it piques your interest, you can sign up for early access at jozu.com. We’d love to hear your feedback! submitted by /u/javafett [link] [comments]

  • [N] ICML 2024 liveblog
    by /u/hcarlens (Machine Learning) on July 24, 2024 at 1:30 pm

    I'm doing an ICML liveblog, for people who aren't attending or are attending virtually and want to get more of a feel of the conference. In the past I've found it's not easy to get a good feel for a conference just from the conference website and Twitter. I'm trying to cover as much as I can, but obviously there are lots of simultaneous sessions and only so many hours in the day! If there's anything you'd like me to cover, give me a shout. Liveblog is here: https://mlcontests.com/icml-2024/?ref=mlcr If you're there in-person, come say hi! The official ICML website is here: https://icml.cc/ submitted by /u/hcarlens [link] [comments]

  • [D] Zero-Shot Entity Matching
    by /u/cedar_mountain_sea28 (Machine Learning) on July 24, 2024 at 9:55 am

    Hello, I am looking into finding a solution to a Zero-Shot Entity Matching model. Ideally what I would like to do is whenever a certain entity is detected twice in two seperate sentences, I want to check if both sentences are talking about the same entity. Any idea about SOTA models and what have been tried so far? submitted by /u/cedar_mountain_sea28 [link] [comments]

  • [R] Zero Shot LLM Classification
    by /u/SkeeringReal (Machine Learning) on July 24, 2024 at 9:50 am

    I'm surprised there is not more research in zero shot classification with GenAI LLMs? They are pretty darn good at this, and I imagine they will just keep getting better. E.g. see this and this Am I missing anything? As AI advances the next 5 years, it seems inevitable to me that these foundation models will continue to grow in common sense reasoning and be the best out of the box classifiers you can get, and likely start to outperform more task specific models which fail on novel classes or edge cases. Why isn't there more research in this? Do people just feel it's obvious? submitted by /u/SkeeringReal [link] [comments]

  • [R] Low rank field-weighted factorization machines
    by /u/alexsht1 (Machine Learning) on July 24, 2024 at 9:40 am

    Our paper 'Low Rank Field-Weighted Factorization Machines for Low Latency Item Recommendation', by Alex Shtoff, Michael Viderman, Naama Haramaty-Krasne, Oren Somekh, Ariel Raviv, and Tularam Ban, has been accepted to RecSys 2024. I believe it's of interest to the ML-driven recommender system community. I think it's especially interesting to researchers working on large scale systems operating under extreme time constraints, such as online advertising. TL;DR: We reduce the cost of inference of FwFM models with n features and nᵢ item features from O(n²) to O(c nᵢ), where c is a small constant. This is to facilitate much cheaper large scale real-time inference for item recommendation. Code and paper: GitHub link. Details FMs are widely used in online advertising because they strike a good balance between representation power, and blazing fast training and inference speed. It is is paramount for large scale recommendation under tight time constraints. The main trick devised by Rendle et. al is computing *pairwise* interactions of n features in O(n) time. Moreover, user / context features, which are the same when ranking multiple items for a given user, can be handled separately (see the image below). The computational cost of a single recommendation becomes O(nᵢ) per item, where nᵢ is the number of item features. Consequently, adding more user or context features is practically free. FM formula in linear time The more advanced variants, such as Field-Aware and Field-Weighted FMs do not enjoy this property and require O(n²) time. This poses a challenge to such systems, and requires carefully thinking weather an additional user or context feature is worth the cost at inference. Typically, aggressive pruning of the field interactions is employed to dramatically reduce the computational cost, at the expense of model accuracy. In this work we devise a reformulation of the Field-Weighted FM family using diagonal plus low-rank (DPLR) factorization of the field interaction matrix, that facilitates inference in O(c nᵢ) time per item, where c is a small constant that we control. As is the case with pruning, the price is a slight reduction in model accuracy. We show that with a comparable number of parameters, the DPLR variant outperforms pruning on real world datasets, while facilitating significantly faster inference speeds, and gaining back the ability to add user context items practically for free. Here is a short chart summarizing the results: Diagonal+LowRank (DPLR) inference time significantly outperforms pruned time, and decreases quickly as the portion of context features (out of 40 total features) is increased. Plotted for various ad auction sizes and model ranks. submitted by /u/alexsht1 [link] [comments]

  • [D] Introducing a tool that helps with reading papers
    by /u/adldotori (Machine Learning) on July 24, 2024 at 9:36 am

    This tool is very convenient for understanding unfamiliar concepts or the author's intent when reading papers. When checking citations, you typically need to click the citation link, scroll down, copy the paper title, and search on Google, but this tool finds it automatically. It also allows for additional conversations, making it quite handy when reading papers. The reason it's more convenient than ChatGPT is that you don't need to copy and paste the paper content, and you can check cited papers using the same tool. Youtube Demo Video: https://youtu.be/sM5b72nGFlU?si=MRnCmCWt1KHyRyQB Key Features 1. Explanation + Chat: Provides explanations and additional discussions for various formats in papers. 1.1. Selected Text: Select the text that needs further explanation and click the Moonlight button to view the explanation. 1.2. Citation: Hover over the citation link to see detailed information about the cited paper and click the Moonlight button to view the explanation. 1.3. Captured Image: Press ctrl and drag with your mouse to capture an image, then click the Moonlight button to view the explanation. 1.4. External: Hover over external links to see explanations about the linked content. 2. Highlight: Select the text and highlight it. 3. Translation: Select the text to see various translation options that fit the context. 4. Preview: Hover over hyperlinks within the paper to preview the content at that location. 5. (Coming Soon!) Valuation: Provides an opinion on the level of depth needed to read the paper before you start reading. 6. (Coming Soon!) Bookmark: Bookmark interesting or important papers. Manage your bookmarked papers on a separate web platform. submitted by /u/adldotori [link] [comments]

  • getting into Diffusion Models [D]
    by /u/Same_Half3758 (Machine Learning) on July 24, 2024 at 8:45 am

    Hello, I have noticed several papers focusing on diffusion models at CVPR 2024, particularly those related to Point Clouds. As I am quite new to this concept, I was wondering what would be a good starting point to better understand it? to save time and energy I am also working on Point Clouds, BTW. thank you submitted by /u/Same_Half3758 [link] [comments]

  • Drinking From a Fire Hose (First 100 Days & Beyond Question)
    by /u/11FoxtrotCharlie (Data Science) on July 23, 2024 at 11:03 pm

    How do you ensure success for employees that you are bringing into the organization? As more and more organizations realize the potential of data science and big data in general, new departments and roles are created to start adding value utilizing the mass amounts of data available. I have been working with data for years, I am well versed in databases, analytics, programming, and architecture. The one thing I haven't been able to excel in is how to set up an organization for growth by providing a way to easily onboard an analyst. There was a thread a few days ago asking why on-boarding is so disorganized and it made me realize that it is because data is disorganized. Or at least, it has been at the majority of companies I have worked and consulted for. Real world example: A global client of mine utilizes 10 different SaaS services in North America, and an additional 10 globally. All of these SaaS services have APIs and they are accessed through those. Now, they have built automations and have other flows/processes in place utilizing legacy software. These all reside either in the cloud, through admin portals, on virtual machines, or running off SQL stored procedures/SSIS flows. When I walked in, to process map the current state was an exercise in patience: "How does this process run?" "On the server" "OK... what server? what is it called? what sources does it hit?" In your organizations: How do you catalog all of the automated processes and flows? How do you document where these flows and processes are stored, saved, run from? How do you provide documentation on all of your data sources and what APIs you are using? - I don't want a data catalog, I want a Readers Digest Family Handyman Guide to Data. Does anyone have a recommendation that a new hire could sit in front of for a week or less and be able to access/understand/follow/reference from there with success? How can I compile all processes that are running and publish a guide for someone coming aboard? I feel like this subject is so often overlooked, but I imagine that it can create an organization that will thrive and grow faster than one where you have to chase senior employees down and hope they remember (or hope that they didn't lose the source code after re-imaging their pc). And no, a saved Word Document in a Shared Folder on a Shared Drive (or the File tab in Microsoft Teams) is not what I think is best practices. submitted by /u/11FoxtrotCharlie [link] [comments]

  • [D] Llama 3 vs llama 3.1 in Medical Domain: Llama 3 Outperforms 3.1 in Base Category
    by /u/aadityaura (Machine Learning) on July 23, 2024 at 8:48 pm

    Just analyzed Llama 3 and 3.1 models in medical tasks. Here are the key findings: 🥇 Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct: Overall champion 🥈 Meta-Llama-3-70B-Instruct: Close runner-up But here's the shocker: In base models (both 70B and 8B), Llama 3 often outperforms Llama 3.1! 🤯 Llama 3.1 70B instruct beats GPT-4 in a few tasks and is almost equal to GPT-4 in Open Medical-LLM Leaderboard 70B Models: Instruct: Llama 3.1 generally outperforms Llama 3 3.1 excels in college biology, 3 in college medicine Both strong in medical genetics Base: Surprisingly, Llama 3 outperforms 3.1 overall 3 dominates in college anatomy 3.1 superior in medical genetics and professional medicine 8B Models: Instruct: Llama 3.1 leads in most categories 3.1 shines in college biology 3 maintains edge in medical genetics Base: Llama 3 slightly outperforms 3.1 overall 3 better in anatomy 3.1 excels in medical genetics and PubMedQA for a detailed comparison check out https://x.com/aadityaura/status/1815836602607768041 For the latest on AI models, datasets, and research in life sciences, check out Open Life Science AI. Don't miss any Model or dataset in the AI x Healthcare domain https://x.com/openlifesciai https://preview.redd.it/5nzv5cd4zbed1.jpg?width=2168&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=52a9abc2fb152393c9378e216e77a29df8e45ec4 submitted by /u/aadityaura [link] [comments]

  • Having problem with langchain loader
    by /u/Longjumping_Ad_7053 (Data Science) on July 23, 2024 at 8:37 pm

    I have the data in JSON format I’m trying to use the jsonloader but apparently I need a download and import a jq module and that’s where my problem is. I have pip installed jq but when it’s time to import it, I get a no module error and yes it’s installed in venv that I am working in. Has anyone had this problem before submitted by /u/Longjumping_Ad_7053 [link] [comments]

  • New Data science jobs in the NFL, Formula1 and sports analytics companies
    by /u/fark13 (Data Science) on July 23, 2024 at 8:14 pm

    Hey guys, I'm constantly checking for jobs in the sports and gaming analytics industry. I've posted recently in this community and had some good comments. I run www.sportsjobs.online, a job board in that niche. In the last month I added around 200 jobs: I'm celebrating I automated all the NFL teams with this post and doing so I've found a few interesting data science and analytics jobs. Sr. Manager, Data Science @ Houston Texans Data Engineer @ Jacksonville Jaguars CRM Analyst, Business Solutions @ Arizona Cardinals Full Stack Software Engineer @ Tennessee Titans NFL Data Scientist @ Swish Analytics F1 Software Engineer - Vehicle Dynamics @ Williams Racings Software Engineer @ Haas F1 Senior Data & Strategy Analyst @ McLaren There are multiple more jobs related to data science, engineering and analytics in the job board. I've created also a reddit community where I post recurrently the openings if that's easier to check for you. I hope this helps someone! submitted by /u/fark13 [link] [comments]

  • Text classification using LLMs
    by /u/tinkerpal (Data Science) on July 23, 2024 at 7:36 pm

    I want to use LLMs to classify color descriptions into 8 different colors. I tried using text embeddings from these color descriptions and applied cosine similarity to classify them, but the performance was not satisfactory. When I use prompts specifying that it’s a color classifier, it gives correct responses. Is there a way to effectively use embeddings for this use case? The dataset is large, so prompt engineering is not a viable option. submitted by /u/tinkerpal [link] [comments]

  • [R] Fine-Tuned Metrics Struggle in Unseen Domains
    by /u/zouharvi (Machine Learning) on July 23, 2024 at 4:44 pm

    10 years ago, machine translation researchers used BLEU to estimate the quality of MT output. Since a few years ago, the community transitioned to using learned metrics (multilingual language model regressors). While overall they correlate better with humans, they have some quirks. One of them being that they perform worse on textual domains outside of the training one. This research with AWS documents the domain bias, look where it happens and publish a new dataset of translation quality judgement by humans. Paper (to appear at ACL): https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.18747 Video (4 minutes): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BG_xAqMNsqY I'm new to this subreddit but excited to engage about this and related research. For this and follow-up work I'm curious about researchers and practitioners who evaluate MT which metrics they go to and what problems you encounter. submitted by /u/zouharvi [link] [comments]

  • Is there a place to learn where people aren't petty and condescending?
    by /u/databro92 (Data Science) on July 23, 2024 at 4:19 pm

    I see people posting in this subreddit frequently trying to learn things, asking for recommendations and tips, trying to discuss data science, and about 50% of the replies here are people who think they are so much smarter than they are being petty, mocking them, being denigrating to them, aggressive, toxic, for no reason at all. Just acting like they think they are one of the smartest people in the world to ever exist.. The other 50% are pretty nice, they talk, provide recommendations, support, words of encouragement, advice, technical information. Some wondering if there is another place where people go to discuss data science as they are learning it. I'm not talking about doing a boot camp, or doing a udemy course or anything like that. I'm talking about a place where people who are devoted to learning data science and machine learning fundamentals can go to discuss freely. submitted by /u/databro92 [link] [comments]

  • [D] Paper that used adversarial noise to perform self-supervised learning and used 20 samples to beat a model trained on 20K samples.
    by /u/Seankala (Machine Learning) on July 23, 2024 at 3:58 pm

    Sorry if this isn't the right sub. I recall reading a paper a few years back that added noise to an input image and performed metric learning with the original. I recall something about how the model was trained using 20 samples and performed on par with a model trained using 20K samples (or something like that). Does anybody know the paper or similar papers that I'm referring to? Thanks in advance. submitted by /u/Seankala [link] [comments]

  • [N] Llama 3.1 405B launches
    by /u/we_are_mammals (Machine Learning) on July 23, 2024 at 3:29 pm

    https://llama.meta.com/ Comparable to GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet, according to the benchmarks The weights are publicly available 128K context submitted by /u/we_are_mammals [link] [comments]

  • [D] Ideas for Gamifying an LLM Workshop for New Graduates
    by /u/nerdimite (Machine Learning) on July 23, 2024 at 3:01 pm

    Hey everyone, I'm looking for ideas to gamify a workshop on LLMs for new college graduates joining our company. The plan is to have hands-on lab exercises in the first half of the day, followed by a hackathon or game in the second half. We have about 6 hours of work time in total. Some background: I previously ran a 3-hour workshop for these students during their internship, covering the basics of gen AI, LLMs, and building a simple RAG-based chatbot for PDFs. Due to system restrictions on work laptops, not everyone could complete the hands-on part. Now they're joining full-time, and this workshop is part of their 3-month training program. I'm trying to improve on the previous session. For context, last year AWS ran a DeepRacer workshop that ended with a race to apply the learnings. I'm aiming for something similar with LLMs – perhaps a game or activity that could serve as a proxy for an LLM, allowing them to apply concepts like RAG and function calling in a competitive setting. The challenge is that the participants have varying levels of programming skills. I'm looking for something that's approachable for beginners but also substantial enough for everyone to learn something beyond basic prompt engineering. If you have any ideas or need more information, let me know. I'm open to suggestions on how to make this an effective learning experience for the new graduates. submitted by /u/nerdimite [link] [comments]

  • [D] Error importing torch_tensorrt
    by /u/Top-Establishment545 (Machine Learning) on July 23, 2024 at 2:03 pm

    hi everyone I am trying to use torch_tensorrt for the first time. I tried installing it with pip install torch-tensorrt and it works fine, but then, when I try to import it in my code, I get an error message: OSError: libtorchtrt.so: undefined symbol: _ZNK3c105Error4whatEv. Does anyone know how to fix this? I could not find anything on the internet. UPDATE: downgrading my python to version 3.10 somehow solved the problem submitted by /u/Top-Establishment545 [link] [comments]

Top 100 Data Science and Data Analytics and Data Engineering Interview Questions and Answers

What are some good datasets for Data Science and Machine Learning?

Ace the 2023 AWS Solutions Architect Associate SAA-C03 Exam with Confidence Pass the 2023 AWS Certified Machine Learning Specialty MLS-C01 Exam with Flying Colors

List of Freely available programming books - What is the single most influential book every Programmers should read

#BlackOwned #BlackEntrepreneurs #BlackBuniness #AWSCertified #AWSCloudPractitioner #AWSCertification #AWSCLFC02 #CloudComputing #AWSStudyGuide #AWSTraining #AWSCareer #AWSExamPrep #AWSCommunity #AWSEducation #AWSBasics #AWSCertified #AWSMachineLearning #AWSCertification #AWSSpecialty #MachineLearning #AWSStudyGuide #CloudComputing #DataScience #AWSCertified #AWSSolutionsArchitect #AWSArchitectAssociate #AWSCertification #AWSStudyGuide #CloudComputing #AWSArchitecture #AWSTraining #AWSCareer #AWSExamPrep #AWSCommunity #AWSEducation #AzureFundamentals #AZ900 #MicrosoftAzure #ITCertification #CertificationPrep #StudyMaterials #TechLearning #MicrosoftCertified #AzureCertification #TechBooks

zCanadian Quiz and Trivia, Canadian History, Citizenship Test, Geography, Wildlife, Secenries, Banff, Tourism

Africa Quiz, Africa Trivia, Quiz, African History, Geography, Wildlife, Culture

Exploring the Pros and Cons of Visiting All Provinces and Territories in Canada.
Exploring the Pros and Cons of Visiting All Provinces and Territories in Canada

Exploring the Advantages and Disadvantages of Visiting All 50 States in the USA
Exploring the Advantages and Disadvantages of Visiting All 50 States in the USA

Health Health, a science-based community to discuss health news and the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic

Today I Learned (TIL) You learn something new every day; what did you learn today? Submit interesting and specific facts about something that you just found out here.

Reddit Science This community is a place to share and discuss new scientific research. Read about the latest advances in astronomy, biology, medicine, physics, social science, and more. Find and submit new publications and popular science coverage of current research.

Reddit Sports Sports News and Highlights from the NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB, MLS, and leagues around the world.

Turn your dream into reality with Google Workspace: It’s free for the first 14 days.
Get 20% off Google Google Workspace (Google Meet) Standard Plan with  the following codes:
Get 20% off Google Google Workspace (Google Meet) Standard Plan with  the following codes: 96DRHDRA9J7GTN6 96DRHDRA9J7GTN6
With Google Workspace, Get custom email @yourcompany, Work from anywhere; Easily scale up or down
Google gives you the tools you need to run your business like a pro. Set up custom email, share files securely online, video chat from any device, and more.
Google Workspace provides a platform, a common ground, for all our internal teams and operations to collaboratively support our primary business goal, which is to deliver quality information to our readers quickly.
Get 20% off Google Workspace (Google Meet) Business Plan (AMERICAS): M9HNXHX3WC9H7YE
Even if you’re small, you want people to see you as a professional business. If you’re still growing, you need the building blocks to get you where you want to be. I’ve learned so much about business through Google Workspace—I can’t imagine working without it.
(Email us for more codes)