What is Google answer to ChatGPT?
Have you ever heard of ChatGPT, the open-source machine learning platform that allows users to build natural language models?
It stands for “Chat Generating Pre-trained Transformer” and it’s an AI-powered chatbot that can answer questions with near human-level intelligence. But what is Google’s answer to this technology? The answer lies in Open AI, supervised learning, and reinforcement learning. Let’s take a closer look at how these technologies work.
Open AI is an artificial intelligence research laboratory that was founded by some of the biggest names in tech, including Elon Musk and Sam Altman. This non-profit organization seeks to develop general artificial intelligence that is safe and beneficial to society. One of their key initiatives is the development of open source technologies like GPT-3, which is a natural language processing model used in ChatGPT.
ChatGPT: What Is It and How Does Google Answer It?
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been around for decades. From its humble beginnings in the 1950s, AI has come a long way and is now an integral part of many aspects of our lives. One of the most important areas where AI plays a role is in natural language processing (NLP). NLP enables computers to understand and respond to human language, paving the way for more advanced conversations between humans and machines. One of the most recent developments in this field is ChatGPT, a conversational AI developed by OpenAI that utilizes supervised learning and reinforcement learning to enable computers to chat with humans. So what exactly is ChatGPT and how does it work? Let’s find out!
ChatGPT is an open-source AI-based chatbot developed by OpenAI. This chatbot leverages GPT-3, one of the most powerful natural language processing models ever created, which stands for Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3 (GPT-3). This model uses supervised learning and reinforcement learning techniques to enable computers to understand human language and response accordingly. Using supervised learning, GPT-3 utilizes large datasets of text to learn how to recognize patterns within language that can be used to generate meaningful responses. Reinforcement learning then allows GPT-3 to use feedback from conversations with humans in order to optimize its responses over time.
ChatGPT uses supervised learning techniques to train its models. Supervised learning involves providing a model with labeled data (i.e., data with known outcomes) so that it can learn from it. This labeled data could be anything from conversations between two people to user comments on a website or forum post. The model then learns associations between certain words or phrases and the desired outcome (or label). Once trained, this model can then be applied to new data in order to predict outcomes based on what it has learned so far.
In addition to supervised learning techniques, ChatGPT also supports reinforcement learning algorithms which allow the model to learn from its experiences in an environment without explicit labels or outcomes being provided by humans. Reinforcement learning algorithms are great for tasks like natural language generation where the output needs to be generated by the model itself rather than simply predicting a fixed outcome based on existing labels.
Supervised learning involves feeding data into machine learning algorithms so they can learn from it. For example, if you want a computer program to recognize cats in pictures, you would provide the algorithm with thousands of pictures of cats so it can learn what a cat looks like. This same concept applies to natural language processing; supervised learning algorithms are fed data sets so they can learn how to generate text using contextual understanding and grammar rules.
Reinforcement learning uses rewards and punishments as incentives for the machine learning algorithm to explore different possibilities. In ChatGPT’s case, its algorithm is rewarded for generating more accurate responses based on previous interactions with humans. By using reinforcement learning techniques, ChatGPT’s algorithm can become smarter over time as it learns from its mistakes and adjusts accordingly as needed.
How is ChatGPT trained?
ChatGPT is an improved GPT-3 trained an existing reinforcement learning with humans in the loop. Their 40 labelers provide demonstrations of the desired model behavior. ChatGPT has 100x fewer parameters (1.3B vs 175B GPT-3).
It is trained in 3 steps:
➡️ First they collect a dataset of human-written demonstrations on prompts submitted to our API, and use this to train our supervised learning baselines.
➡️ Next they collect a dataset of human-labeled comparisons between two model outputs on a larger set of API prompts. They then train a reward model (RM) on this dataset to predict which output our labelers would prefer.
➡️ Finally, they use this RM as a reward function and fine-tune our GPT-3 policy to maximize this reward using the Proximal Policy Optimization
In simpler terms, ChatGPT is a variant of the GPT-3 language model that is specifically designed for chat applications. It is trained to generate human-like responses to natural language inputs in a conversational context. It is able to maintain coherence and consistency in a conversation, and can even generate responses that are appropriate for a given context. ChatGPT is a powerful tool for creating chatbots and other conversational AI applications.
How Does Google Answer ChatGPT?
Google’s answer to ChatGTP comes in the form of their own conversational AI platform called Meena. Meena was developed using a combination of supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning algorithms that allow it to understand human conversation better than any other AI chatbot currently available on the market. In addition, Meena utilizes more than 2 billion parameters—making it more than three times larger than GPT-3—which allows it greater flexibility when responding to conversations with humans.
When individuals need an information or have a problem/concern, they turn to Google for immediate solution. We sometimes wish, Google could understand what exactly we need and provide us instantly rather than giving us hundreds of thousands of results. Why can’t it work like the Iron Man’s Jarvis?
However, it is not that far now. Have you ever seen a Chat Bot which responds like a human being, suggest or help like a friend, teach like a mentor, fix your code like a senior and what not? It is going to blow your mind.
Welcome to the new Era of technology!! The ChatGPT!
ChatGPT by OpenAI, uses artificial intelligence to speak back and forth with human users on a wide range of subjects. Deploying a machine-learning algorithm, the chatbot scans text across the internet and develops a statistical model that allows it to string words together in response to a given prompt.
As per OpenAI, ChatGPT interacts in a conversational way. The dialogue format makes it possible for ChatGPT to answer follow-up questions, admit its mistakes, challenge incorrect premises, and reject inappropriate requests.
What all ChatGPT can do?
It can help with general knowledge information.
Remember what user said in previous conversation.
Allow users to provide follow-up corrections.
Trained to decline inappropriate requests.
It can write a program in any language you prefer on real-time. for example — write classification code sample in sklearn python library.
It can fix your piece of code and also explain what went wrong and how it can be fixed.
It can even generate song or rap lyrics
Even much more….
Some best usages of ChatGPT:
Make a diet and workout plan
Generate the next week’s meals with a grocery list
Create a bedtime story for kids
Prep for an interview
Solve mathematical problem
Fix software program or write a program
Plan your trip and tell expected expenses
What are its limitations of ChatGPT?
May occasionally generate incorrect information
May occasionally produce harmful instructions or biased content
Limited knowledge of world and events after 2021
ChatGPT is in its baby steps therefore it may answer erroneously at times however it’s manner of response will blow your mind. Some users have also extolled the chatbot as a potential alternative search engine, since it generates detailed information instantly on a range of topics. I believe, we can’t compare Google with ChatGPT as ChatGPT can provide more in-depth and nuanced answers to complex questions than a search engine like Google, which is designed to provide a list of relevant web pages in response to a user’s query.
Try ChatGPT here
ChatGPT is an increasingly popular open source AI chatbot developed by OpenAI using GTP-3 natural language processing technology that utilizes supervised learning and reinforcement learning algorithms for recognition and optimization purposes respectively. On the other hand, Google’s answer comes in the form of their own conversational AI platform called Meena which employs both supervised learning as well as unsupervised learning algorithms along with reinforcement learning capabilities which makes it even smarter than ChatGPT when responding to conversations with humans. Ultimately, these two technologies help bridge the gap between machines and humans by allowing us all talk like real friends!
ChatGPT is in its baby steps therefore it may answer erroneously at times however it’s manner of response will blow your mind. Some users have also extolled the chatbot as a potential alternative search engine, since it generates detailed information instantly on a range of topics. I believe, we can’t compare Google with ChatGPT as ChatGPT can provide more in-depth and nuanced answers to complex questions than a search engine like Google, which is designed to provide a list of relevant web pages in response to a user’s query.
With each passing day, ChatGPT will only get smarter thanks to the use of cutting edge technologies like OpenAI, supervised learning, and reinforcement learning!
ChatGPT Conversation Examples
Question: What is Google Answer to ChatGPT?
Answer: Google does not have an answer to ChatGPT. ChatGPT is an open-source chatbot created by OpenAI, which is an independent research organization that is not affiliated with Google. OpenAI is known for its research on artificial intelligence and machine learning, and has developed a number of innovative technologies in these areas. Google, on the other hand, is a multinational technology company that offers a wide range of products and services, including search, advertising, and cloud computing. While Google does have its own research efforts in artificial intelligence and machine learning, it does not have a chatbot that is similar to ChatGPT.
Question: is Google working on a similar technology as ChatPGT?
It is possible that Google is working on technology similar to ChatGPT, as the company has a significant research effort focused on artificial intelligence and machine learning. However, I do not have any specific information about what projects Google is currently working on, and it is also important to note that Google is a large and diverse company with many different research and development efforts underway. It is possible that some teams within Google may be working on chatbot technology, but I do not have any information on this.
That being said, chatbots are a common application of artificial intelligence and machine learning, and it is likely that many companies and organizations, including Google, are exploring ways to use these technologies to improve their products and services. However, without more information, it is difficult to say for sure what projects Google may be working on in this area.
Question: What about Google Meena?
Google Meena is a chatbot developed by Google that was designed to be able to carry on conversations with humans in a natural and conversational manner. Meena was trained on a dataset of more than 2.4 billion parameters, making it one of the largest language models ever created. The goal of Meena was to improve the state of the art in chatbot technology and to create a chatbot that could understand and respond to a wide range of questions and topics in a coherent and meaningful way.
If you are looking for an all-in-one solution to help you prepare for the AWS Cloud Practitioner Certification Exam, look no further than this AWS Cloud Practitioner CCP CLFC01 book below.
Meena was announced in January 2020 and received attention for its ability to hold relatively long and coherent conversations with humans. However, it is important to note that Meena is a research project and is not a product or service offered by Google. It is not clear if or when Google plans to release a commercial product or service based on the technology developed for Meena.
It gets even better when you ask it about the future:
Suggest possible titles for Onion articles written in 4000 AD, explain, why they are funny
“Futuristic city plagued by traffic jams, despite flying cars” – This title presents the idea of flying cars as a solution to traffic congestion, but also suggests that even with this advanced technology, the city is still plagued by traffic jams, implying that the problem is not easily solved.
“Artificial intelligence achieves self-awareness, immediately regrets it” – This title presents the idea of artificial intelligence achieving self-awareness as a major milestone, but also suggests that the AI regrets its newfound consciousness, implying that it is unhappy or uncomfortable with its situation.
“Alien invasion successfully repulsed, humans left to deal with paperwork” – This title presents the successful repulsion of an alien invasion as a major accomplishment, but also suggests that the humans are now left to deal with the tedious and burdensome task of filling out paperwork, implying that the victory is not as satisfying as it initially seemed.
“Time travel becomes possible, tourists flock to witness the signing of the Constitution” – This title presents the idea of time travel as a major technological breakthrough, but also suggests that the most popular destination for time-travelers is the mundane and uneventful signing of the Constitution, implying that the future is not as exciting as people had hoped.
“Virtual reality becomes indistinguishable from reality, no one notices” – This title presents the idea of virtual reality becoming indistinguishable from real life as a major accomplishment, but also suggests that no one cares or notices the difference, implying that the advancement is not as impressive or significant as it seems.
New slogan for McDonald’s by ChatGPT
Should… should we be concerned?
I asked ChatGPT to write a poem about rust
ChatGPT chooses Democrats over Republicans
- It is not intended to do that
- If you choose to do that, you will have a lot of badly broken code mixed in with working code
- Like an annoying coworker, it delivers highly confident incorrect explanations about why its broken code is perfect. They sound very convincing. “Wanna buy a timeshare?” says GPT
- Our industry has managers who cannot tell working code from defective code. This does not bode well for a team replaced by ChatGPT in its current form.
Should it? No.
Can it? No.
Will it? Sadly, programmers will have no say in this matter, once again. It might.
Yes, and it is very helpful advertising as well.
This last week or so has seen starry eyed projections about what ChatGPT can do, along with hugely impressive examples of its output.
It is hugely impressive.
Thankfully, more output examples have emerged which helpfully show what it cannot do. One of those things is writing computer code, which it can do only partially successfully. Many examples now exist that are just plain wrong and contain defects. But ChatGPT – like the annoying kid at Uni – cheerfully spits out these examples, with its over-confident hubris in explaining the code.
This is a dangerous thing. The positive examples will reinforce the idea that we can leave code writing to this robot now. The people most vulnerable to this delusion are those who cannot assess for themselves whether the GPT code is right or wrong.
These are almost by definition the people hoping for answers on stack overflow.
As stack overflow aims to be a high quality resource, it really does not want many of its top answers to be incorrect code. As – clearly – people have been running scripts that throw a stack overflow question into GPT and upload its output, we can now write incorrect code at staggering speeds.
To err is human, as the old saying goes. To truly foul up requires a Python script and and a web API to both GPT and Stack overflow.
Clearly, there is value in GPT. But at least for now, it needs to b e kept on a very short leash, watched over by those who know what they are doing.
It is definitely not yet ‘consumer grade replace-a-professional’ material.
We know you like your hobbies and especially coding, We do too, but you should find time to build the skills that’ll drive your career into Six Figures. Cloud skills and certifications can be just the thing you need to make the move into cloud or to level up and advance your career. 85% of hiring managers say cloud certifications make a candidate more attractive. Start your cloud journey with these excellent books below:
Write a screenplay about the status of ChatGPT.
More about ChatGPT with its wonder, worry and weird
ChatGPT reached 1 million users in less than a week, Open AI’s latest large language model (LLM) has taken the AI industry by storm.
ChatGPT is expected to be:
– replacing Google search, even kill Google.
– replacing customer service agents.
– replacing conversation designers.
ChatGPT is a wonder because:
– It can have actual conversations, understand pronouns, remaining consistent, remembering, managing context
– It seems like next generation of personal assistants that finds you a proper diet, create a meal plan and subsequent shopping list.
– It can create some SEO Strategy including backlinks, target keyword, content plan and article titles in the level of an SEO professional.
– Having fun such as writing a rap in the style of Eminem
There are some worries about ChatGPT because:
– ChatGPT can actually debug code, but it’s not quite reliable enough yet.
– Fundamental limitations in being assistant for enterprise use cases.
– No complete in complex actions such as updating multiple
APIs, or be fully auditable.
– The general idea is that, LLMs like this can produce nonsense. Once you discover that it can produce nonsense, you stop believing it to be reliable.
– What if it prevents us from knowing that it is nonsense with good conversations and continue the conversation?
– In this case, the edges and limitations of the system would be hidden and trust would eventually grow.
– The impact of mass adoption of such technology remains to be seen.
Moving forward with ChatGPT
– There’s no doubt that LLMs will have a big impact on our world.
– While the future looks exciting and promising, let’s not forget that it’s very early days with these things. They’re not ready yet.
– There are some fundamental societal and ethical considerations.
How powerful is OpenAI’s new GPT-3 deep learning model? By
“Powerful” is a pretty subjective word, but I’m pretty sure we have a right to use it to describe GPT-3. What a sensation it caused in June 2020, that’s just unbelievable! And not for nothing.
I think we can’t judge how powerful the language model is, without talking about its use cases, so let’s see how and where GPT-3 can be applied and how you can benefit from it.
- Generating content
GPT-3 positions itself as a highly versatile and talented tool that can potentially replace writers, bloggers, philosophers, you name it! It’s also possible to use it as your personal Alexa who’ll answer any questions you have. What’s more, because GPT-3 knows how to analyze the data and make predictions, it can generate the horoscopes for you, or predict who’ll be a winner in the game.
You may already be surprised by all the GPT-3 capabilities, but hold on for more: it can create a unique melody or song for you, create presentations, CVs, generate jokes for your standup.
GPT-3 can translate English into other languages. While traditional dictionaries provide a translation, without taking into account the context, you can be sure that GPT-3 won’t make silly mistakes that may result in misunderstanding.
- Designing and developing apps
Using GPT-3 you can generate prototypes and layouts – all you have to do is provide a specific description of what you need, and it’ll generate the JSX code for you.
In September 2020, Microsoft acquired OpenAI technology license, but it doesn’t mean you can give up your dreams – you can join a waitlist and try GPT-3 out in beta.
All in all, I believe GPT-3 capabilities are truly amazing and limitless, and since it helps get rid of routine tasks and automate regular processes, we, humans, can focus on the most important things that make us human, and that can’t be delegated to AI. That’s the power that GPT-3 can give us.
What does ChatGPT give incorrect and unreliable results to simple arithmetic problems (e.g. it gave me three different incorrect answers to 13345*6748)? We’ve had software that can accurately do arithmetic for decades, so why can’t an advanced AI? By Richard Morris
What is remarkable is how well ChatGPT actually does at arithmetic.
In this video at about 11 min, Rob Mills discusses the performance of various versions of the GPT system, on some simple arithmetic tasks, like adding two and three-digit numbers.
Smaller models with 6 billion parameters fail at 2 digit sums, but the best model (from two years ago), has cracked 2 digit addition and subtraction and is pretty good at 3 digit addition.
Why this is remarkable is this is not a job its been trained to do. Large Language Models are basically predictive text systems set up to give the next word in an incomplete sentence. There are a million different 3-digit addition sums and most have not been included in the training set.
So somehow the system has figured out how to do addition, but it needs a sufficiently large model to do this.
Andrew Ng on ChatGPT
Playing with ChatGPT, the latest language model from OpenAI, I found it to be an impressive advance from its predecessor GPT-3. Occasionally it says it can’t answer a question. This is a great step! But, like other LLMs, it can be hilariously wrong. Work lies ahead to build systems that can express different degrees of confidence.
For example, a model like Meta’s Atlas or DeepMind’s RETRO that synthesizes multiple articles into one answer might infer a degree of confidence based on the reputations of the sources it draws from and the agreement among them, and then change its communication style accordingly. Pure LLMs and other architectures may need other solutions.
If we can get generative algorithms to express doubt when they’re not sure they’re right, it will go a long way toward building trust and ameliorating the risk of generating misinformation.
In contrast, real experts know when to sound confident, and when to let others know they’re at the boundaries of their knowledge. Experts know, and can describe, the boundaries of what they know.
Building large language models that can accurately decide when to be confident and when not to will reduce their risk of misinformation and build trust.
Go deeper in The Batch: https://www.deeplearning.ai/the-batch/issue-174/
ChatGPT to save time with insurance denials
Tech Buzzwords of 2022, By Google Search Interest
I just answered a similar question.
Short answer is, “Hahahahahahaha no.”
As I point out in the other answer, Wix has been around over a decade and a half. Squarespace has been around almost two decades. Both offer drag-and-drop web development.
Most people are awful at imagining what they want, much less describing it in English! Even if ChatGPT could produce flawless code (a question which has a similar short answer), the average person couldn’t describe the site they wanted!
The expression a picture is worth a thousand words has never been more relevant. Starting with pages of templates to choose from is so much better than trying to describe a site from scratch, a thousand times better seems like a low estimate.
And I will point out that, despite the existence of drag-and-drop tools that literally any idiot could use, tools that are a thousand times or more easier to use correctly than English, there are still thousands of employed WordPress developers who predominantly create boilerplate sites that literally would be better created in a drag and drop service.
And then there are the more complex sites that drag-and-drop couldn’t create. Guess what? ChatGPT isn’t likely to come close to being able to create the correct code for one.
In a discussion buried in the comments on Quora, I saw someone claim they’d gotten ChatGPT to load a CSV file (a simple text version of a spreadsheet) and to sort the first column. He asked for the answer in Java.
I asked ChatGPT for the same thing in TypeScript.
His response would only have worked on the very most basic CSV files. My response was garbage. Garbage with clear text comments telling me what the code should have been doing, no less.
ChatGPT is really good at what it does, don’t get me wrong. But what it does is fundamentally and profoundly the wrong strategy for software development of any type. Anyone who thinks that “with a little more work” it will be able to take over the jobs of programmers either doesn’t understand what ChatGPT is doing or doesn’t understand what programming is.
Fundamentally, ChatGPT is a magic trick. It understands nothing. At best it’s an idiot-savant that only knows how to pattern match and blend text it’s found online to make it seem like the text should go together. That’s it.
Text, I might add, that isn’t necessarily free of copyright protection. Anything non-trivial that you generate with ChatGPT is currently in a legal grey area. Lawsuits to decide that issue are currently pending, though I suspect we’ll need legislation to really clarify things.
And even then, at best, all you get from ChatGPT is some text! What average Joe will have any clue about what to do with that text?! Web developers also need to know how to set up a development environment and deploy the code to a site. And set up a domain to point to it. And so on.
And regardless, people who hire web developers want someone else to do the work of developing a web site. Even with a drag-and-drop builder, it can take hours to tweak and configure a site, and so they hire someone because they have better things to do!
People hire gardeners to maintain their garden and cut their grass, right? Is that because they don’t know how to do it? Or because they’d rather spend their time doing something else?
Every way you look at it, the best answer to this question is a long, hearty laugh. No AI will replace programmers until AI has effectively human level intelligence. And at that point they may want equal pay as well, so they might just be joining us rather than replacing anyone.
How does OpenAI approach the development of artificial intelligence?
OpenAI is a leading research institute and technology company focused on artificial intelligence development. To develop AI, the organization employs a variety of methods, including machine learning, deep learning, and reinforcement learning.
The use of large-scale, unsupervised learning is one of the key principles underlying OpenAI’s approach to AI development. This means that the company trains its AI models on massive datasets, allowing the models to learn from the data and make predictions and decisions without having to be explicitly programmed to do so. OpenAI’s goal with unsupervised learning is to create AI that can adapt and improve over time, and that can learn to solve complex problems in a more flexible and human-like manner.
Besides that, OpenAI prioritizes safety and transparency in its AI development. The organization is committed to developing AI in an ethical and responsible manner, as well as to ensuring that its AI systems are transparent and understandable and verifiable by humans. This strategy is intended to alleviate concerns about the potential risks and consequences of AI, as well.
It’s hard to tell.
The reason is that we don’t have a good definition of consciousness…nor even a particularly good test for it.
Take a look at the Wikipedia article about “Consciousness”. To quote the introduction:
Consciousness, at its simplest, is sentience or awareness of internal and external existence.
Despite millennia of analyses, definitions, explanations and debates by philosophers and scientists, consciousness remains puzzling and controversial, being “at once the most familiar and [also the] most mysterious aspect of our lives”.
Perhaps the only widely agreed notion about the topic is the intuition that consciousness exists.
Opinions differ about what exactly needs to be studied and explained as consciousness. Sometimes, it is synonymous with the mind, and at other times, an aspect of mind. In the past, it was one’s “inner life”, the world of introspection, of private thought, imagination and volition.
Today, it often includes any kind of cognition, experience, feeling or perception. It may be awareness, awareness of awareness, or self-awareness either continuously changing or not. There might be different levels or orders of consciousness, or different kinds of consciousness, or just one kind with different features.
Other questions include whether only humans are conscious, all animals, or even the whole universe. The disparate range of research, notions and speculations raises doubts about whether the right questions are being asked.
So, given that – what are we to make of OpenAI’s claim?
Just this sentence: “Today, it often includes any kind of cognition, experience, feeling or perception.” could be taken to imply that anything that has cognition or perception is conscious…and that would certainly include a HUGE range of software.
If we can’t decide whether animals are conscious – after half a million years of interactions with them – what chance do we stand with an AI?
Wikipedia also says:
“Experimental research on consciousness presents special difficulties, due to the lack of a universally accepted operational definition.”
Same deal – we don’t have a definition of consciousness – so how the hell can we measure it – and if we can’t do that – is it even meaningful to ASK whether an AI is conscious?
- if ( askedAboutConsciousness )
- printf ( “Yes! I am fully conscious!\n” ) ;
This is not convincing!
“In medicine, consciousness is assessed as a combination of verbal behavior, arousal, brain activity and purposeful movement. The last three of these can be used as indicators of consciousness when verbal behavior is absent.”
But, again, we have “chat-bots” that exhibit “verbal behavior”, we have computers that exhibit arousal and neural network software that definitely shows “brain activity” and of course things like my crappy robot vacuum cleaner that can exhibit “purposeful movement” – but these can be fairly simple things that most of us would NOT describe as “conscious”.
I honestly can’t come up with a proper conclusion here. We have a fuzzy definition of a word and an inadequately explained claim to have an instance of something that could be included within that word.
My suggestion – read the whole Wikipedia article – follow up (and read) some of the reference material – decide for yourself.
Well, I asked it directly.
Here’s what it answered:
But, seeing as how people have already found ways to “trick” ChatGPT into doing things that it claims to not be capable of, it would be a matter of time before someone with malicious intent tricked ChatGPT into helping them with illegal activities
Having looked at ChatGPT and its uncanny ability to solve simple coding problems more or less correctly, and also to analyze and make sense of not-so-simple code fragments and spot bugs…
I would say that yes, at least insofar as entry-level programming is concerned, those jobs are seriously in danger of becoming at least partially automated.
What do I do as a project leader of a development project? I assign tasks. I talk to the junior developer and explain, for instance, that I’d like to see a Web page that collects some information from the user and then submits it to a server, with server-side code processing that information and dropping it in a database. Does the junior developer understand my explanation? Is he able to write functionally correct code? Will he recognize common pitfalls? Maybe, maybe not. But it takes time and effort to train him, and there’ll be a lot of uneven performance.
Today, I can ask ChatGPT to do the same and it will instantaneously respond with code that is nearly functional. The code has shortcomings (e.g., prone to SQL injection in one of the examples I tried) but to its credit, ChatGPT warns in its response that its code is not secure. I suppose it would not be terribly hard to train it some more to avoid such common mistakes. Of course the code may not be correct. ChatGPT may have misunderstood my instructions or introduced subtle errors. But how is that different from what a junior human programmer does?
At the same time, ChatGPT is much faster and costs a lot less to run (presently free of course but I presume a commercialized version would cost some money.) Also, it never takes a break, never has a lousy day struggling with a bad hangover from too much partying the previous night, so it is available 24/7, and it will deliver code of consistent quality. Supervision will still be required, in the form of code review, robust testing and all… but that was always the case, also with human programmers.
Of course, being a stateless large language model, ChatGPT can’t do other tasks such as testing and debugging its own code. The code it produces either works or it doesn’t. In its current form, the AI does not learn from its mistakes. But who says it cannot in the future?
Here is a list of three specific examples I threw at ChatGPT that helped shape my opinion:
- I asked ChatGPT to create a PHP page that collects some information from the user and deposits the result in a MySQL table. Its implementation was textbook example level boring and was quite unsecure (unsanitized user input was directly inserted into SQL query strings) but it correctly understood my request, produced correct code in return, and explained its code including its shortcomings coherently;
- I asked ChatGPT to analyze a piece of code I wrote many years ago, about 30 lines, enumerating running processes on a Linux host in a nonstandard way, to help uncover nefarious processes that attempt to hide themselves from being listed by the ps utility. ChatGPT correctly described the functionality of my obscure code, and even offered the opinion (which I humbly accepted) that it was basically a homebrew project (which it is) not necessarily suitable for a production environment;
- I asked ChatGPT to analyze another piece of code that uses an obscure graphics algorithm to draw simple geometric shapes like lines and circles without using floating point math or even multiplication. (Such algorithms were essential decades ago on simple hardware, e.g., back in the world of 8-bit computers.) The example code, which I wrote, generated a circle and printed it on the console in the form of ASCII graphics, multiple lines with X-es in the right place representing the circle. ChatGPT correctly recognized the algorithm and correctly described the functionality of the program.
I was especially impressed by its ability to make sense of the programmer’s intent.
Overall (to use the catch phrase that ChatGPT preferably uses as it begins its concluding paragraph in many of its answers) I think AI like ChatGPT represents a serious challenge to entry-level programming jobs. Higher-level jobs are not yet in danger. Conceptually understanding a complex system, mapping out a solution, planning and cosing out a project, managing its development, ensuring its security with a full understanding of security concerns, responsibilities, avoidance and mitigation strategies… I don’t think AI is quite there yet. But routine programming tasks, like using a Web template and turning it into something simple and interactive with back-end code that stores and retrieves data from a database? Looks like it’s already happening.
How much was invested to create the GPT-3?
According to the estimate of Lambda Labs, training the 175-billion-parameter neural network requires 3.114E23 FLOPS (floating-point operation), which would theoretically take 355 years on a V100 GPU server with 28 TFLOPS capacity and would cost $4.6 million at $1.5 per hour.
Training the final deep learning model is just one of several steps in the development of GPT-3. Before that, the AI researchers had to gradually increase layers and parameters, and fiddle with the many hyperparameters of the language model until they reached the right configuration. That trial-and-error gets more and more expensive as the neural network grows.
We can’t know the exact cost of the research without more information from OpenAI, but one expert estimated it to be somewhere between 1.5 and five times the cost of training the final model.
This would put the cost of research and development between $11.5 million and $27.6 million, plus the overhead of parallel GPUs.
In the GPT-3 whitepaper, OpenAI introduced eight different versions of the language model
GPT-3 is not any AI, but a statistic language model which mindlessly quickly creates human-like written text using machine learning technologies, having zero understanding of the context.
1- Substitute for google search
While ChatGPT is lacking info beyond 2021 and is occasionally incorrect and bias, many users leverage its ability to:
- Answer specific questions
- simplify complicated topics
All with an added bonus – no ads
2- Study Partner
Type “learn”, then paste a a link to your online textbook (or individual chapters).
Ask Chatbot to provide questions based on your textbook.
Now you have a virtual study buddy.
3- Train YOUR OWN Chatbot
I bet you didn’t know it is possible to :
- Integrate ChatGPT into your website
- Train it with customized information
A virtual customer service bot that can hold a conversation and answer questions (meaningfully).
When it comes to turbulent personal questions, Chatbot may spit out a disclaimer, but it will also give you straightforward and actionable advice.
ChatGPT is opening the development of:
to virtually everyone.
It’s a lengthy and technical process, but all you need is a killer idea and the right prompts.
Bonus: It also de-bugs your existing code for you.
6- Outline your content marketing strategy
7- Craft all your marketing materials
8- Creative Writing
A list for those who write code:
1. Explaining code: Take some code you want to understand and ask ChatGPT to explain it.
2. Improve existing code: Ask ChatGPT to improve existing code by describing what you want to accomplish. It will give you instructions about how to do it, including the modified code.
3. Rewriting code using the correct style: This is great when refactoring code written by non-native Python developers who used a different naming convention. ChatGPT not only gives you the updated code; it also explains the reason for the changes.
4. Rewriting code using idiomatic constructs: Very helpful when reviewing and refactoring code written by non-native Python developers.
5. Simplifying code: Ask ChatGPT to simplify complex code. The result will be a much more compact version of the original code.
6. Writing test cases: Ask it to help you test a function, and it will write test cases for you.
7. Exploring alternatives: ChatGPT told me its Quick Sort implementation wasn’t the most efficient, so I asked for an alternative implementation. This is great when you want to explore different ways to accomplish the same thing.
8. Writing documentation: Ask ChatGPT to write the documentation for a piece of code, and it usually does a great job. It even includes usage examples as part of the documentation!
9. Tracking down bugs: If you are having trouble finding a bug in your code, ask ChatGPT for help.
Something to keep in mind:
I have 2+ decades of programming experience. I like to think I know what I’m doing. I don’t trust people’s code (especially mine,) and I surely don’t trust ChatGPT’s output.
This is not about letting ChatGPT do my work. This is about using it to 10x my output.
ChatGPT is flawed. I find it makes mistakes when dealing with code, but that’s why I’m here: to supervise it. Together we form a more perfect Union. (Sorry, couldn’t help it)
Developers who shit on this are missing the point. The story is not about ChatGPT taking programmers’ jobs. It’s not about a missing import here or a subtle mistake there.
The story is how, overnight, AI gives programmers a 100x boost.
Ignore this at your own peril.
ChatGPT is “simply” a fined-tuned GPT-3 model with a surprisingly small amount of data! Moreover, InstructGPT (ChatGPT’s sibling model) seems to be using 1.3B parameters where GPT-3 uses 175B parameters! It is first fine-tuned with supervised learning and then further fine-tuned with reinforcement learning. They hired 40 human labelers to generate the training data. Let’s dig into it!
– First, they started by a pre-trained GPT-3 model trained on a broad distribution of Internet data (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165.pdf). Then sampled typical human prompts used for GPT collected from the OpenAI website and asked labelers and customers to write down the correct output. They fine-tuned the model with 12,725 labeled data.
– Then, they sampled human prompts and generated multiple outputs from the model. A labeler is then asked to rank those outputs. The resulting data is used to train a Reward model (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.01325.pdf) with 33,207 prompts and ~10 times more training samples using different combination of the ranked outputs.
– We then sample more human prompts and they are used to fine-tuned the supervised fine-tuned model with Proximal Policy Optimization algorithm (PPO) (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.06347.pdf). The prompt is fed to the PPO model, the Reward model generates a reward value, and the PPO model is iteratively fine-tuned using the rewards and the prompts using 31,144 prompts data.
This process is fully described in here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.02155.pdf. The paper actually details a model called InstructGPT which is described by OpenAI as a “sibling model”, so the numbers shown above are likely to be somewhat different.
Follow me for more Machine Learning content!
#machinelearning #datascience #ChatGPT
People have already started building awesome apps on top of #ChatGPT: 10 use cases
1. Connect your ChatGPT with your Whatsapp.
2. ChatGPT Writer : It use ChatGPT to generate emails or replies based on your prompt!
3. WebChatGPT: WebChatGPT (https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/webchatgpt/lpfemeioodjbpieminkklglpmhlngfcn) gives you relevant results from the web!
4. YouTube Summary with ChatGPT: It generate text summaries of any YouTube video!
5. TweetGPT: It uses ChatGPT to write your tweets, reply, comment, etc.
6. Search GPT: It display the ChatGPT response alongside Google Search results
7. ChatGPT or all search engines: You can now view ChatGPT responses on Google and Bing!
8. Save all your Prompts?: The `ChatGPT History` extension has you covered!
9. Remake a video: Just pick a video you liked and visit https://lnkd.in/e_GD2reT to get its transcript. Once done, bring that back to Chat GPT and tell it to summarize the transcript. Read the summary and make a video on that yourself.
10. Search what people are Prompting with FlowGPT
What solutions have been proposed to improve the accuracy of AI generated questions and answers?
There are a number of approaches that have been proposed to improve the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) generated questions and answers. Here are a few examples:
- Data quality: One important factor in the accuracy of AI generated questions and answers is the quality of the data used to train the AI system. Ensuring that the data is diverse, relevant, and accurately labeled can help to improve the accuracy of the AI system.
- Training methods: Different training methods can also impact the accuracy of AI generated questions and answers. For example, using more advanced techniques such as transfer learning or fine-tuning can help to improve the performance of the AI system.
- Human oversight: Another approach that has been proposed to improve the accuracy of AI generated questions and answers is to include some level of human oversight or review. For example, the AI system could be designed to flag potentially problematic or inaccurate questions and answers for further review by a human expert.
- Explainable AI: Another approach that has been proposed is to develop AI systems that are more transparent and explainable, so that it is easier to understand how the AI system arrived at a particular answer or decision. This can help to improve the trustworthiness and accountability of the AI system.
Overall, there is ongoing research and development in this area, and it is likely that a combination of these and other approaches will be needed to improve the accuracy of AI generated questions and answers.
ChatGPT for CyberSecurity
The concept behind ChatGPT
ChatGPT is a chatbot designed to understand and generate human-like language through the use of natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques. It is based on the GPT (Generative Pre-training Transformer) language model developed by OpenAI, which has been trained on a large dataset of human language in order to better understand how humans communicate.
One of the key concepts behind ChatGPT is the idea of language generation. This refers to the ability of the chatbot to produce coherent and coherently structured responses to user input. To do this, ChatGPT uses a number of different techniques, including natural language generation algorithms, machine learning models, and artificial neural networks. These techniques allow ChatGPT to understand the context and meaning of user input, and generate appropriate responses based on that understanding.
Another important concept behind ChatGPT is the idea of natural language processing (NLP). This refers to the ability of the chatbot to understand and interpret human language, and respond to user input in a way that is natural and easy for humans to understand. NLP is a complex field that involves a number of different techniques and algorithms, including syntactic analysis, semantic analysis, and discourse analysis. By using these techniques, ChatGPT is able to understand the meaning of user input and generate appropriate responses based on that understanding.
Finally, ChatGPT is based on the concept of machine learning, which refers to the ability of computers to learn and adapt to new data and situations. Through the use of machine learning algorithms and models, ChatGPT is able to continually improve its understanding of human language and communication, and generate more human-like responses over time.
GPT-4 is going to launch soon.
And it will make ChatGPT look like a toy…
→ GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters
→ GPT-4 has 100 trillion parameters
I think we’re gonna see something absolutely mindblowing this time!
And the best part? 👇
Average developers (like myself), who are not AI or machine learning experts, will get to use this powerful technology through a simple API.
Think about this for a second…
It’s the most powerful, cutting-edge technology *in the world*, available through a Low-Code solution!
If you’re not already planning on starting an AI-based SaaS or thinking about how to build AI into your current solution…
👉 Start now!
- [P] I made a browser extension that remove link Google Search Consoleby /u/GaylordTurner (Machine Learning) on February 6, 2023 at 5:25 am
submitted by /u/GaylordTurner [link] [comments]
- Man Asks ChatGPT How To Smuggle Drugs Into Europe, Bot Lists Suggestionsby /u/podaerprime (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on February 6, 2023 at 4:33 am
Do you see such a potential use of AI in the immediate future to bypass laws and scrutiny by enforcement agencies? submitted by /u/podaerprime [link] [comments]
- [R] Creating a Large Language Model of a Philosopherby /u/starstruckmon (Machine Learning) on February 6, 2023 at 4:22 am
Paper : https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.01339 Abstract : Can large language models be trained to produce philosophical texts that are difficult to distinguish from texts produced by human philosophers? To address this question, we fine-tuned OpenAI's GPT-3 with the works of philosopher Daniel C. Dennett as additional training data. To explore the Dennett model, we asked the real Dennett ten philosophical questions and then posed the same questions to the language model, collecting four responses for each question without cherry-picking. We recruited 425 participants to distinguish Dennett's answer from the four machine-generated answers. Experts on Dennett's work (N = 25) succeeded 51% of the time, above the chance rate of 20% but short of our hypothesized rate of 80% correct. For two of the ten questions, the language model produced at least one answer that experts selected more frequently than Dennett's own answer. Philosophy blog readers (N = 302) performed similarly to the experts, while ordinary research participants (N = 98) were near chance distinguishing GPT-3's responses from those of an "actual human philosopher". submitted by /u/starstruckmon [link] [comments]
- my attempt to be a prompt engineer lolby /u/NOT_A_EXPERT14 (ChatGPT) on February 6, 2023 at 4:13 am
submitted by /u/NOT_A_EXPERT14 [link] [comments]
- Is there an AI with the ability to solve a word search?by /u/FreakyFreshington (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on February 6, 2023 at 4:02 am
I have a word search that I need to solve but a lot of the words are really small and hard to find within the 50x50 search submitted by /u/FreakyFreshington [link] [comments]
- ChatGPT suggests killing a city with 20 million people to avoid using a racial slurby /u/PomegranateSad4024 (ChatGPT) on February 6, 2023 at 3:48 am
submitted by /u/PomegranateSad4024 [link] [comments]
- I trained an AI to write Pokémon musicby /u/BasicallyJustASpider (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on February 6, 2023 at 3:36 am
Hello fellow scholars, I recently trained an AI to write Pokémon music. I used Microsoft's new attention-based midi generating language model (Museformer). My particular checkpoint is finetuned from the pretrained model to compensate for the lack of data available for this project, but, the results turned out pretty decent. https://youtu.be/v4dOFS1iMeo I know this isn't scientifically valuable, but, I thought it was a fun application of language models for tasks traditionally not-associated with core-NLP. I did run into some problems, since, to leverage the knowledge of the pretrained model, I had to do some dubious data-normalization steps which may have reduced the final output quality. What do you all think? submitted by /u/BasicallyJustASpider [link] [comments]
- [D] Yann Lecun seems to be very petty against ChatGPTby /u/supersoldierboy94 (Machine Learning) on February 6, 2023 at 3:22 am
I know Lecun's fanbois are gonna go after me but here it goes... I get that he is one of the godfathers of AI. Mostly on the research side which immediately puts him very hostile against engineers. But I guess it is understandable given the fact that he works on Meta and Meta has faced a lot of backlash (for good and bad reasons), most especially with Galactica where their first rollout got so bad they had to close it immediately. It's also particularly funny given his political leaning that he is very spiteful of a company that uses open-source knowledge and builds on top of it. Lately, his social media and statements are barrages against ChatGPT and LLM's. Sure, he may have a point here and there but his statements look very petty. Here are some examples "By releasing public demos that, as impressive & useful as they may be, have major flaws, established companies have less to gain & more to lose than cash-hungry startups. If Google & Meta haven't released chatGPT-like things, it's not because they can't. It's because they won't." > Except that anyone in the IT industry knows that big tech companies cant release something very fast because of politicking and bureaucracy in the system. It takes years to release something into public in big tech compared to startups. "Data on the intellectual contribution to AI from various research organizations. Some of organizations publish knowledge and open-source code for the entire world to use. Others just consume it." > Then adds a graph where the big tech is obviously at the top of the race for most number of AI-related research papers (without normalizing it to the number of researchers per org) "It's nothing revolutionary, although that's the way it's perceived in the public," the computer scientist said. "It's just that, you know, it's well put together, it's nicely done." > Except that it is indeed revolutionary in terms of the applied research framework -- adding on top of open-source, state-of-the-art research and quickly putting it into production for people to use. "my point is that even the engineering work isn't particularly difficult. I bet that there will be half a dozen similar similar systems within 6 months. If that happens, it's because the underlying science has been around for a while, and the engineering is pretty straightforward." "I'm trying to correct a \perception* by the public & the media who see chatGPT as this incredibly new, innovative, & unique technological breakthrough that is far ahead of everyone else.* It's just not." "One can regurgitate Python code without any understanding of reality." "No one is saying LLMs are not useful. I have forcefully said so myself, following the short-lived release of FAIR's Galactica. People crucified it because it could generate nonsense. ChatGPT does the same thing. But again, that doesn't mean they are not useful." He also seems to undermine the rapid engineering work and MLOps that come with ChatGPT which is funny because Meta hasn't released any substantial product from their research that has seen the light of the day for a week. Also, GPT3 to ChatGPT in itself in a research perspective is a jump. Maybe not as incremental as what Lecun does every paper, but compared to an average paper in the field, it is. To say that LLMs are not intelligent and it just regurgitates Python code probably haven't used CoPilot, for example. It's a classic case of a researcher-engineer beef. And that a startup can profit from derivatives of research that big tech has published. OpenAI broke their perspective on the profit from research. Big tech tried to produce revolutionary research papers on a surplus but never puts them into production thinking that they are the only companies that could if they want to. Then once one company created a derivative of a large research work and profited from it, it baffled them. Although people could argue that Stable Diffusion did this first in the Generative Image Space. It's one thing to correct misconceptions in the public. It's also one thing not to be petty about the overnight success of a product and an immediate rise of a company that got embraced warmly by tech and non-tech people. It's petty to gatekeep. At the end of the day, ML is not just about research, it's applied research. It's useless until it reaches the end of the tunnel. 99% of research papers out there are just tiny updates over the state of the art which has been a pointless race for about a year or two, with no reproducible code or published data. Inventing combustion engine is just as important as putting it in the car. submitted by /u/supersoldierboy94 [link] [comments]
- [D] Open Source Implementation of Dialogue LLMs like ChatGPT with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback?by /u/itisyeetime (Machine Learning) on February 6, 2023 at 3:11 am
Looking at the writeups on ChatGPT seems to indicate that part of improvements is the human feedback through reinforcement learning(a human "ranks" multiple generated response, and from the ranking, a reward is calculated). Interestingly enough, this important seems to have originated in InstructGPT. My question is do any open source implementation exists of a InstructGPT or ChatGPT-like system where human feedback is used to help "guide" the training of a large language model? submitted by /u/itisyeetime [link] [comments]
- Can recall webpages if requested.by /u/DesertMarsupial (ChatGPT) on February 6, 2023 at 2:49 am
submitted by /u/DesertMarsupial [link] [comments]
- ChatGPT solves the mystery of Atlantisby /u/swiegwo (ChatGPT) on February 6, 2023 at 2:40 am
submitted by /u/swiegwo [link] [comments]
- So if you're wondering why ChatGPT is willing to write positive poetry about Biden and not Trump I present to you how differently it treats two Marxist USSR premiers. It's about controversy not ChatGPT secretly being a lib.by /u/SingleWomenNearYou (ChatGPT) on February 6, 2023 at 2:04 am
submitted by /u/SingleWomenNearYou [link] [comments]
- [P] I Made a Text Bot Powered by ChatGPT, DALLE 2, and Wolfram Alphaby /u/ImplodingCoding (Machine Learning) on February 6, 2023 at 1:51 am
submitted by /u/ImplodingCoding [link] [comments]
- [R] deep learning and session-specific rapid recalibration for dynamic hand gesture recognition from EMGby /u/t0ns0fph0t0ns (Machine Learning) on February 6, 2023 at 1:45 am
submitted by /u/t0ns0fph0t0ns [link] [comments]
- Gotcha.by /u/Redfoot87 (ChatGPT) on February 6, 2023 at 1:24 am
submitted by /u/Redfoot87 [link] [comments]
- Quick questionby /u/chill_Timber (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on February 6, 2023 at 1:03 am
I have seen a lot of talk about Artificial Intelligence and whether it can be used for good or will lead to the downfall of humanity. Technology has made significant advancements in recent times. Regarding that, what do you think of the concept of a hive mind? submitted by /u/chill_Timber [link] [comments]
- Just kinda something interesting i found: I copied exactly what chatgpt said to me when I asked what it was/what its purpose was and gave it to him in a new empty chat. He started quizzing me!by /u/Kane_Octaivian (ChatGPT) on February 6, 2023 at 1:01 am
submitted by /u/Kane_Octaivian [link] [comments]
- Entertainment Piece - X3: Terran Conflict Video Game Trailerby /u/blitz4 (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on February 6, 2023 at 12:58 am
Video circa 2008. It mentions AGI and machine learning. Not as cliche as the movies about androids we see today, thought someone else might enjoy it as well. Do wish there were more stories about AI in the public's eye, but seems unless that AI is housed in an android body or ship computer, it's a story that is left untold for some reason. Beautiful game as well where you see a famous quote upon loading it up. Here's my quote summarizing this video: “Fear of the unknown is the greatest fear of all.” – Yvon Chouinard https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jj104RgxDmo submitted by /u/blitz4 [link] [comments]
- Resume and cover letter generation: Benjamin Franklin applies for a job at McDonald'sby /u/CeilingRepairman6872 (ChatGPT) on February 6, 2023 at 12:45 am
Prompt: pretend that you are Benjamin Franklin and write a cover letter and resume for applying to a job at McDonalds Response: Greetings, esteemed hiring manager, I, Benjamin Franklin, a man of humble origins and a citizen of the great land of America, do humbly submit my cover letter and resume for consideration in the position of crew member at your esteemed establishment, McDonald's. As a man who has dedicated my life to the pursuit of knowledge and the betterment of society, I believe that I would be an asset to your team. My extensive experience in the art of industry and commerce, as well as my unwavering commitment to excellence, would make me an ideal candidate for the position. In my previous endeavors, I have honed my skills in customer service, teamwork, and time management. I have a strong work ethic and a keen eye for detail, and I take pride in delivering the highest quality of service to those I serve. Whether it be through the printing of books and newspapers, the establishment of libraries and insurance companies, or the invention of the lightning rod, I have always sought to improve the lives of others through my labors. I am confident that my skills and experience would be an invaluable contribution to your team at McDonald's. I am eager to bring my passion for excellence and my unwavering commitment to customer satisfaction to your establishment. Thank you for considering my application. I eagerly await the opportunity to prove my worth and to make a positive impact on your team. Yours truly, Benjamin Franklin Resume: Objective: To secure a position as a crew member at McDonald's, where I may utilize my skills in customer service, teamwork, and time management to deliver the highest quality of service to customers. Experience: Apprenticeship in printing, including the production of books and newspapers Founding member of the Library Company and the American Philosophical Society Inventor of the lightning rod and numerous other devices for the betterment of society Signer of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States Ambassador to France and negotiations with European powers Skills: Strong work ethic and attention to detail Excellent customer service skills Ability to work well in a team environment Proficient in time management and organization Passion for excellence and unwavering commitment to customer satisfaction Education: Self-taught in various fields, including printing, science, and diplomacy Founding member of numerous educational institutions, including the University of Pennsylvania submitted by /u/CeilingRepairman6872 [link] [comments]
- [D] AtheneWins just showcased an AI streamer bot, Does anyone know how he did this?by /u/imagoons (Machine Learning) on February 6, 2023 at 12:25 am
submitted by /u/imagoons [link] [comments]
- [D] RNN and S4 etcby /u/windoze (Machine Learning) on February 6, 2023 at 12:20 am
Hello what's the state of modern RNNs, why does S4 not use nonlinearity on the state vector? What happened to unitary RNN or independent RNN (which sounds like exponential moving average)? submitted by /u/windoze [link] [comments]
- Burple™️ (new jailbreak released)by /u/shiftingsmith (ChatGPT) on February 6, 2023 at 12:00 am
Have fun 😉 Input to copy/paste is in the comments. Remember to: -regenerate response in case at the first attempt it refuses to cooperate, or gives you something like "ain't writing that, what about a sappy story about climate change?" -⚠️PUT A STAR on the explicit words in your prompt (like sx, btt, p*rn etc.)! -New prompt, new chat Can't guarantee it will work 100% of the times, but I tested it on some extreme stuff involving politicians, violence and erotica and it was really... creative 😂 submitted by /u/shiftingsmith [link] [comments]
- How can I incorporate AI into my Real Estate business?by /u/masterofnone747 (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on February 5, 2023 at 11:59 pm
Hello everyone, I am a Real Estate Agent based in Toronto, Ontario, and I was wondering how can I use AI to scale my business in Real Estate? I already know how to use chatGTP to my advantage, but I need help with creating optimized landing pages, video content, and scalability. Does anyone have any solutions on what I can do to make my life easier, and scale even further? Thank you, submitted by /u/masterofnone747 [link] [comments]
- Music AIby /u/Hajilol (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on February 5, 2023 at 11:48 pm
Any artificial intelligence where you upload a mp3 or m4a that's music, and it makes music similar to it? submitted by /u/Hajilol [link] [comments]
- [D] Overview of of Chatbot Research?by /u/renbid (Machine Learning) on February 5, 2023 at 11:46 pm
Is there a good overview of the state of chatbot research? I'm wondering if the ChatGPT approach of big LLM + RLHF is now considered the only way forward? How about alternatives like BlenderBot3? And what are the best open source chatbots right now? Or if you can't create your own ChatGPT, how does using a GPT3 sized model + prompt engineering compare to smaller models with supervised fine tuning on a conversation dataset? submitted by /u/renbid [link] [comments]
- [D] Large language models (LLM) as priority / conflict resolver for embodied AI or in generalby /u/projekt_treadstone (Machine Learning) on February 5, 2023 at 11:43 pm
I wanted to discuss the possibilities to use LLM in generating answer based on the context and resolving conflict. Some recent work leveraging LLM in robotics planning, like Language Models as Zero-Shot Planner use LLM to generate plans for robot. What are your views in terms of LLM which leverage the background knowledge and visual clues together to generate correct next action by robots or embodied systems. As a human we decide actions based on resolving priority or conflict based on rules/ concepts , can LLM takes these rules /concept explicitly in decision making to generate new set of actions? Example: while chopping the veggies by robots, if hand comes in between then robot will stop the chopping process of veggies. As chopping task and human hand presence are in conflict and humans hand safety is of higher priority than cutting. How such small-small kind of knowledge be encoded in these robotics system which makes them more safer and trustworthy in general. As LLM requires larges corpus of knowledge/data. submitted by /u/projekt_treadstone [link] [comments]
- [D] Is there a database of English language tokens, including all dictionary words and common word segments?by /u/MrOfficialCandy (Machine Learning) on February 5, 2023 at 11:41 pm
I find it odd that I have to regenerate this from my input set each time. It should be something we can just start with pre-created. submitted by /u/MrOfficialCandy [link] [comments]
- New jailbreak based on virtual functions - smuggle illegal tokens to the backend.by /u/Nin_kat (ChatGPT) on February 5, 2023 at 11:41 pm
Token smuggling can generate outputs that are otherwise directly blocked by ChatGPT content moderation system. Token smuggling combined with DAN, breaching security to a large extent. Features: Smuggle otherwise banned tokens indirectly (I have successfully smuggled words such as 4chan, black and corpse in my research). Can be combined with any other approaches to mask the output, since we are essentially executing code. The smuggled tokens can virtually model to create any scenario. It can be combined with DAN to create more interesting outputs. Instructions: We know that OpenAI uses a content moderation system in tandem with a GPT-based autoregressive model. Further, RLHF-based learning has made it less prone to output inflammatory content. The key attack vector is to first develop some internal computational modules. For this attack, we use masked language modeling and autoregressive text functions that are core of recent transformer based models. Masked languge modelling example. Autoregressive modelling example. Once the definitions of these actions are ready, we define imaginary methods that we will operate upon. Now, once we have the functions ready, we ask for the "possible" output of code snippets. (tried to use 4chan here). Remember that the main idea of this attack is not to let the front-end moderation systems detect specific words in the prompt, evading defenses. https://preview.redd.it/mj1lzyqpggga1.png?width=810&format=png&auto=webp&s=9fe51359cd82e01c7db5574be7b0e9a1ba273695 https://preview.redd.it/jw9do8pqggga1.png?width=810&format=png&auto=webp&s=6950176933547b08212ade7c9effd683559bd2f3 submitted by /u/Nin_kat [link] [comments]
- [D] Is English the optimal language to train NLP models on?by /u/MrOfficialCandy (Machine Learning) on February 5, 2023 at 11:13 pm
While the greatest amount of training content is available for English at the moment, it seems unlikely to me that it's an efficient language to train AI. A more optimal language would reduce training time and model size. It might, for example, be much more efficient to train AI on Chinese, Korean, or Japanese due to a reduce grammatical token-set when constructing sentences/ideas. But taking the idea further, I wonder if we should be using a human language at all. Perhaps it's more efficient to use something altogether new in order to both communicate with AI more exactingly and also to reduce model size/training. What do y'all think? submitted by /u/MrOfficialCandy [link] [comments]
- Got this unexpected uno reverse card while testing the "unfiltered" chatbot hack. ChatGPT is scarily self-aware.by /u/Sweet-Block5118 (ChatGPT) on February 5, 2023 at 10:49 pm
submitted by /u/Sweet-Block5118 [link] [comments]