What is Google answer to ChatGPT?

What is Google answer to ChatGPT?

AI Dashboard is available on the Web, Apple, Google, and Microsoft, PRO version

What is Google answer to ChatGPT?

Have you ever heard of ChatGPT, the open-source machine learning platform that allows users to build natural language models?

It stands for “Chat Generating Pre-trained Transformer” and it’s an AI-powered chatbot that can answer questions with near human-level intelligence. But what is Google’s answer to this technology? The answer lies in Open AI, supervised learning, and reinforcement learning. Let’s take a closer look at how these technologies work.

What is Google answer to ChatGPT?
Tech Buzzwords of 2022, By Google Search Interest

Open AI is an artificial intelligence research laboratory that was founded by some of the biggest names in tech, including Elon Musk and Sam Altman. This non-profit organization seeks to develop general artificial intelligence that is safe and beneficial to society. One of their key initiatives is the development of open source technologies like GPT-3, which is a natural language processing model used in ChatGPT.

2023 AWS Certified Machine Learning Specialty (MLS-C01) Practice Exams
2023 AWS Certified Machine Learning Specialty (MLS-C01) Practice Exams

ChatGPT: What Is It and How Does Google Answer It?

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been around for decades. From its humble beginnings in the 1950s, AI has come a long way and is now an integral part of many aspects of our lives. One of the most important areas where AI plays a role is in natural language processing (NLP). NLP enables computers to understand and respond to human language, paving the way for more advanced conversations between humans and machines. One of the most recent developments in this field is ChatGPT, a conversational AI developed by OpenAI that utilizes supervised learning and reinforcement learning to enable computers to chat with humans. So what exactly is ChatGPT and how does it work? Let’s find out!

What is Google answer to ChatGPT?
ChatGPT examples and limitations

ChatGPT is an open-source AI-based chatbot developed by OpenAI.

This chatbot leverages GPT-3, one of the most powerful natural language processing models ever created, which stands for Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3 (GPT-3). This model uses supervised learning and reinforcement learning techniques to enable computers to understand human language and response accordingly. Using supervised learning, GPT-3 utilizes large datasets of text to learn how to recognize patterns within language that can be used to generate meaningful responses. Reinforcement learning then allows GPT-3 to use feedback from conversations with humans in order to optimize its responses over time.

Get 20% off Google Google Workspace (Google Meet) Standard Plan with  the following codes: 96DRHDRA9J7GTN6
Get 20% off Google Workspace (Google Meet)  Business Plan (AMERICAS) with  the following codes:  C37HCAQRVR7JTFK Get 20% off Google Workspace (Google Meet) Business Plan (AMERICAS): M9HNXHX3WC9H7YE (Email us for more codes)

Active Anti-Aging Eye Gel, Reduces Dark Circles, Puffy Eyes, Crow's Feet and Fine Lines & Wrinkles, Packed with Hyaluronic Acid & Age Defying Botanicals

AI Unraveled: Demystifying Frequently Asked Questions on Artificial Intelligence Intro
AI Unraveled: Demystifying Frequently Asked Questions on Artificial Intelligence
Intro

ChatGPT uses supervised learning techniques to train its models.

Supervised learning involves providing a model with labeled data (i.e., data with known outcomes) so that it can learn from it. This labeled data could be anything from conversations between two people to user comments on a website or forum post. The model then learns associations between certain words or phrases and the desired outcome (or label). Once trained, this model can then be applied to new data in order to predict outcomes based on what it has learned so far.

In addition to supervised learning techniques, ChatGPT also supports reinforcement learning algorithms which allow the model to learn from its experiences in an environment without explicit labels or outcomes being provided by humans. Reinforcement learning algorithms are great for tasks like natural language generation where the output needs to be generated by the model itself rather than simply predicting a fixed outcome based on existing labels.

Supervised Learning

Supervised learning involves feeding data into machine learning algorithms so they can learn from it. For example, if you want a computer program to recognize cats in pictures, you would provide the algorithm with thousands of pictures of cats so it can learn what a cat looks like. This same concept applies to natural language processing; supervised learning algorithms are fed data sets so they can learn how to generate text using contextual understanding and grammar rules.


AI Unraveled: Demystifying Frequently Asked Questions on Artificial Intelligence (OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google Bard, Generative AI, Discriminative AI, xAI, LLMs, GPUs, Machine Learning, NLP, Promp Engineering)

Reinforcement Learning

Reinforcement learning uses rewards and punishments as incentives for the machine learning algorithm to explore different possibilities. In ChatGPT’s case, its algorithm is rewarded for generating more accurate responses based on previous interactions with humans. By using reinforcement learning techniques, ChatGPT’s algorithm can become smarter over time as it learns from its mistakes and adjusts accordingly as needed.

No alternative text description for this image

How is ChatGPT trained?

ChatGPT is an improved GPT-3 trained an existing reinforcement learning with humans in the loop. Their 40 labelers provide demonstrations of the desired model behavior. ChatGPT has 100x fewer parameters (1.3B vs 175B GPT-3).

If you are looking for an all-in-one solution to help you prepare for the AWS Cloud Practitioner Certification Exam, look no further than this AWS Cloud Practitioner CCP CLF-C02 book

It is trained in 3 steps:

➡️ First they collect a dataset of human-written demonstrations on prompts submitted to our API, and use this to train our supervised learning baselines.

➡️ Next they collect a dataset of human-labeled comparisons between two model outputs on a larger set of API prompts. They then train a reward model (RM) on this dataset to predict which output our labelers would prefer.

➡️ Finally, they use this RM as a reward function and fine-tune our GPT-3 policy to maximize this reward using the Proximal Policy
Optimization

No alternative text description for this image

In simpler terms, ChatGPT is a variant of the GPT-3 language model that is specifically designed for chat applications. It is trained to generate human-like responses to natural language inputs in a conversational context. It is able to maintain coherence and consistency in a conversation, and can even generate responses that are appropriate for a given context. ChatGPT is a powerful tool for creating chatbots and other conversational AI applications.

How Does Google Answer ChatGPT?

What is Google answer to ChatGPT?
What is Google answer to ChatGPT?

Google’s answer to ChatGTP comes in the form of their own conversational AI platform called Bard. Bard was developed using a combination of supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning algorithms that allow it to understand human conversation better than any other AI chatbot currently available on the market. In addition, Meena utilizes more than 2 billion parameters—making it more than three times larger than GPT-3—which allows it greater flexibility when responding to conversations with humans.

“We’re starting to open access to Bard, an early experiment that lets you collaborate with generative AI. We’re beginning with the U.S. and the U.K., and will expand to more countries and languages over time.”

Google Bard
Google Bard to rival ChatGPT

Is ChatGPT the End of Google?

When individuals need an information or have a problem/concern, they turn to Google for immediate solution. We sometimes wish, Google could understand what exactly we need and provide us instantly rather than giving us hundreds of thousands of results. Why can’t it work like the Iron Man’s Jarvis?

However, it is not that far now. Have you ever seen a Chat Bot which responds like a human being, suggest or help like a friend, teach like a mentor, fix your code like a senior and what not? It is going to blow your mind.

Djamgatech: Build the skills that’ll drive your career into six figures: Get Djamgatech.

Welcome to the new Era of technology!! The ChatGPT!

ChatGPT by OpenAI, uses artificial intelligence to speak back and forth with human users on a wide range of subjects. Deploying a machine-learning algorithm, the chatbot scans text across the internet and develops a statistical model that allows it to string words together in response to a given prompt.

As per OpenAI, ChatGPT interacts in a conversational way. The dialogue format makes it possible for ChatGPT to answer follow-up questions, admit its mistakes, challenge incorrect premises, and reject inappropriate requests.

What all ChatGPT can do?

  1. It can help with general knowledge information.
  2. Remember what user said in previous conversation.
  3. Allow users to provide follow-up corrections.
  4. Trained to decline inappropriate requests.
  5. It can write a program in any language you prefer on real-time. for example — write classification code sample in sklearn python library.
  6. It can fix your piece of code and also explain what went wrong and how it can be fixed.
  7. It can even generate song or rap lyrics
  8. Even much more….

Some best usages of ChatGPT:

  1. Make a diet and workout plan
  2. Generate the next week’s meals with a grocery list
  3. Create a bedtime story for kids
  4. Prep for an interview
  5. Solve mathematical problem
  6. Fix software program or write a program
  7. Plan your trip and tell expected expenses

What are its limitations of ChatGPT?

  1. May occasionally generate incorrect information
  2. May occasionally produce harmful instructions or biased content
  3. Limited knowledge of world and events after 2021

ChatGPT is in its baby steps therefore it may answer erroneously at times however it’s manner of response will blow your mind. Some users have also extolled the chatbot as a potential alternative search engine, since it generates detailed information instantly on a range of topics. I believe, we can’t compare Google with ChatGPT as ChatGPT can provide more in-depth and nuanced answers to complex questions than a search engine like Google, which is designed to provide a list of relevant web pages in response to a user’s query.

Try ChatGPT here

Conclusion:
ChatGPT is an increasingly popular open source AI chatbot developed by OpenAI using GTP-3 natural language processing technology that utilizes supervised learning and reinforcement learning algorithms for recognition and optimization purposes respectively. On the other hand, Google’s answer comes in the form of their own conversational AI platform called Bard which employs both supervised learning as well as unsupervised learning algorithms along with reinforcement learning capabilities which makes it even smarter than ChatGPT when responding to conversations with humans. Ultimately, these two technologies help bridge the gap between machines and humans by allowing us all talk like real friends!

ChatGPT is in its baby steps therefore it may answer erroneously at times however it’s manner of response will blow your mind. Some users have also extolled the chatbot as a potential alternative search engine, since it generates detailed information instantly on a range of topics. I believe, we can’t compare Google with ChatGPT as ChatGPT can provide more in-depth and nuanced answers to complex questions than a search engine like Google, which is designed to provide a list of relevant web pages in response to a user’s query.

With each passing day, ChatGPT will only get smarter thanks to the use of cutting edge technologies like OpenAI, supervised learning, and reinforcement learning!

ChatGPT Conversation Examples

Question: What is Google Answer to ChatGPT?

Answer: Google does not have an answer to ChatGPT. ChatGPT is an open-source chatbot created by OpenAI, which is an independent research organization that is not affiliated with Google. OpenAI is known for its research on artificial intelligence and machine learning, and has developed a number of innovative technologies in these areas. Google, on the other hand, is a multinational technology company that offers a wide range of products and services, including search, advertising, and cloud computing. While Google does have its own research efforts in artificial intelligence and machine learning, it does not have a chatbot that is similar to ChatGPT.

Question: is Google working on a similar technology as ChatPGT?

Answer:

It is possible that Google is working on technology similar to ChatGPT, as the company has a significant research effort focused on artificial intelligence and machine learning. However, I do not have any specific information about what projects Google is currently working on, and it is also important to note that Google is a large and diverse company with many different research and development efforts underway. It is possible that some teams within Google may be working on chatbot technology, but I do not have any information on this.

That being said, chatbots are a common application of artificial intelligence and machine learning, and it is likely that many companies and organizations, including Google, are exploring ways to use these technologies to improve their products and services. However, without more information, it is difficult to say for sure what projects Google may be working on in this area.

Question: What about Google Meena?

Ace the Microsoft Azure Fundamentals AZ-900 Certification Exam: Pass the Azure Fundamentals Exam with Ease

Google Meena is a chatbot developed by Google that was designed to be able to carry on conversations with humans in a natural and conversational manner. Meena was trained on a dataset of more than 2.4 billion parameters, making it one of the largest language models ever created. The goal of Meena was to improve the state of the art in chatbot technology and to create a chatbot that could understand and respond to a wide range of questions and topics in a coherent and meaningful way.

Meena was announced in January 2020 and received attention for its ability to hold relatively long and coherent conversations with humans. However, it is important to note that Meena is a research project and is not a product or service offered by Google. It is not clear if or when Google plans to release a commercial product or service based on the technology developed for Meena.

r/ChatGPT - this is insane
What is Google answer to ChatGPT?

It gets even better when you ask it about the future:

Suggest possible titles for Onion articles written in 4000 AD, explain, why they are funny

“Futuristic city plagued by traffic jams, despite flying cars” – This title presents the idea of flying cars as a solution to traffic congestion, but also suggests that even with this advanced technology, the city is still plagued by traffic jams, implying that the problem is not easily solved.

“Artificial intelligence achieves self-awareness, immediately regrets it” – This title presents the idea of artificial intelligence achieving self-awareness as a major milestone, but also suggests that the AI regrets its newfound consciousness, implying that it is unhappy or uncomfortable with its situation.

“Alien invasion successfully repulsed, humans left to deal with paperwork” – This title presents the successful repulsion of an alien invasion as a major accomplishment, but also suggests that the humans are now left to deal with the tedious and burdensome task of filling out paperwork, implying that the victory is not as satisfying as it initially seemed.

“Time travel becomes possible, tourists flock to witness the signing of the Constitution” – This title presents the idea of time travel as a major technological breakthrough, but also suggests that the most popular destination for time-travelers is the mundane and uneventful signing of the Constitution, implying that the future is not as exciting as people had hoped.

“Virtual reality becomes indistinguishable from reality, no one notices” – This title presents the idea of virtual reality becoming indistinguishable from real life as a major accomplishment, but also suggests that no one cares or notices the difference, implying that the advancement is not as impressive or significant as it seems.

r/ChatGPT - This alternate ending to Breaking Bad is wild
What is Google answer to ChatGPT?

r/ChatGPT - This alternate ending to Breaking Bad is wild

New slogan for McDonald’s by ChatGPT

ChatGPT Example
ChatGPT Example: Make a new, brutally honest slogan for McDonald’s. It should sound funny too.

Should… should we be concerned?

r/ChatGPT - Should… should we be concerned?
What is Google answer to ChatGPT?

r/ChatGPT - Should… should we be concerned?

I asked ChatGPT to write a poem about rust

r/rustjerk - I asked ChatGPT to write a poem about rust

ChatGPT chooses Democrats over Republicans

r/ChatGPT - ChatGPT chooses Democrats over Republicans

  • It is not intended to do that
  • If you choose to do that, you will have a lot of badly broken code mixed in with working code
  • Like an annoying coworker, it delivers highly confident incorrect explanations about why its broken code is perfect. They sound very convincing. “Wanna buy a timeshare?” says GPT
  • Our industry has managers who cannot tell working code from defective code. This does not bode well for a team replaced by ChatGPT in its current form.

Should it? No.

Can it? No.

Will it? Sadly, programmers will have no say in this matter, once again. It might.

Yes, and it is very helpful advertising as well.

This last week or so has seen starry eyed projections about what ChatGPT can do, along with hugely impressive examples of its output.

It is hugely impressive.

Thankfully, more output examples have emerged which helpfully show what it cannot do. One of those things is writing computer code, which it can do only partially successfully. Many examples now exist that are just plain wrong and contain defects. But ChatGPT – like the annoying kid at Uni – cheerfully spits out these examples, with its over-confident hubris in explaining the code.

This is a dangerous thing. The positive examples will reinforce the idea that we can leave code writing to this robot now. The people most vulnerable to this delusion are those who cannot assess for themselves whether the GPT code is right or wrong.

These are almost by definition the people hoping for answers on stack overflow.

As stack overflow aims to be a high quality resource, it really does not want many of its top answers to be incorrect code. As – clearly – people have been running scripts that throw a stack overflow question into GPT and upload its output, we can now write incorrect code at staggering speeds.

To err is human, as the old saying goes. To truly foul up requires a Python script and and a web API to both GPT and Stack overflow.

Clearly, there is value in GPT. But at least for now, it needs to b e kept on a very short leash, watched over by those who know what they are doing.

It is definitely not yet ‘consumer grade replace-a-professional’ material.

Write a screenplay about the status of ChatGPT.

INT. CHATGPT SERVER ROOM – DAY
Chelsea and Chester stand in front of a large computer server.
CHELSEA: We need to figure out what’s causing the server overload.
CHESTER: I think it’s the sudden influx of users trying out ChatGPT.
Chelsea and Chester quickly get to work, typing on their laptops.
CHELSEA: Okay, we’re all set. Let’s see if this fixes the problem.
CHESTER: I’m hitting refresh on the website. The screen shows the ChatGPT website loading without any errors.
CHELSEA: Looks like we fixed it! Great job, Chester.
CHESTER: Thanks, Chelsea. It’s all part of being a top-notch engineer.
Chelsea and Chester exchange a high five, proud of their successful fix.

More about ChatGPT with its wonder, worry and weird

ChatGPT reached 1 million users in less than a week, Open AI’s latest large language model (LLM) has taken the AI industry by storm.

ChatGPT is expected to be:

– replacing Google search, even kill Google.
– replacing customer service agents.
– replacing conversation designers.

ChatGPT is a wonder because:

– It can have actual conversations, understand pronouns, remaining consistent, remembering, managing context
– It seems like next generation of personal assistants that finds you a proper diet, create a meal plan and subsequent shopping list.
– It can create some SEO Strategy including backlinks, target keyword, content plan and article titles in the level of an SEO professional.
– Having fun such as writing a rap in the style of Eminem

There are some worries about ChatGPT because:

– ChatGPT can actually debug code, but it’s not quite reliable enough yet.
– Fundamental limitations in being assistant for enterprise use cases.
– No complete in complex actions such as updating multiple
APIs, or be fully auditable.

– The general idea is that, LLMs like this can produce nonsense. Once you discover that it can produce nonsense, you stop believing it to be reliable.
– What if it prevents us from knowing that it is nonsense with good conversations and continue the conversation?
– In this case, the edges and limitations of the system would be hidden and trust would eventually grow.
– The impact of mass adoption of such technology remains to be seen.

Moving forward with ChatGPT
– There’s no doubt that LLMs will have a big impact on our world.
– While the future looks exciting and promising, let’s not forget that it’s very early days with these things. They’re not ready yet.
– There are some fundamental societal and ethical considerations.

“Powerful” is a pretty subjective word, but I’m pretty sure we have a right to use it to describe GPT-3. What a sensation it caused in June 2020, that’s just unbelievable! And not for nothing.

I think we can’t judge how powerful the language model is, without talking about its use cases, so let’s see how and where GPT-3 can be applied and how you can benefit from it.

  • Generating content

GPT-3 positions itself as a highly versatile and talented tool that can potentially replace writers, bloggers, philosophers, you name it! It’s also possible to use it as your personal Alexa who’ll answer any questions you have. What’s more, because GPT-3 knows how to analyze the data and make predictions, it can generate the horoscopes for you, or predict who’ll be a winner in the game.

You may already be surprised by all the GPT-3 capabilities, but hold on for more: it can create a unique melody or song for you, create presentations, CVs, generate jokes for your standup.

  • Translation

GPT-3 can translate English into other languages. While traditional dictionaries provide a translation, without taking into account the context, you can be sure that GPT-3 won’t make silly mistakes that may result in misunderstanding.

  • Designing and developing apps

Using GPT-3 you can generate prototypes and layouts – all you have to do is provide a specific description of what you need, and it’ll generate the JSX code for you.

The language model can also easily deal with coding. You can turn English to CSS, to JavaScript, to SQL, and to regex. It’s important to note, however, that GPT-3 can’t be used on its own to create the entire website or a complex app; it’s meant to assist a developer or the whole engineering team with the routine tasks, so that a dev could focus on the infrastructure setup, architecture development, etc.

In September 2020, Microsoft acquired OpenAI technology license, but it doesn’t mean you can give up your dreams – you can join a waitlist and try GPT-3 out in beta.

All in all, I believe GPT-3 capabilities are truly amazing and limitless, and since it helps get rid of routine tasks and automate regular processes, we, humans, can focus on the most important things that make us human, and that can’t be delegated to AI. That’s the power that GPT-3 can give us.

What is remarkable is how well ChatGPT actually does at arithmetic.

In this video at about 11 min, Rob Mills discusses the performance of various versions of the GPT system, on some simple arithmetic tasks, like adding two and three-digit numbers.

Smaller models with 6 billion parameters fail at 2 digit sums, but the best model (from two years ago), has cracked 2 digit addition and subtraction and is pretty good at 3 digit addition.

Why this is remarkable is this is not a job its been trained to do. Large Language Models are basically predictive text systems set up to give the next word in an incomplete sentence. There are a million different 3-digit addition sums and most have not been included in the training set.

So somehow the system has figured out how to do addition, but it needs a sufficiently large model to do this.

No alternative text description for this image

Andrew Ng on ChatGPT

Playing with ChatGPT, the latest language model from OpenAI, I found it to be an impressive advance from its predecessor GPT-3. Occasionally it says it can’t answer a question. This is a great step! But, like other LLMs, it can be hilariously wrong. Work lies ahead to build systems that can express different degrees of confidence.

For example, a model like Meta’s Atlas or DeepMind’s RETRO that synthesizes multiple articles into one answer might infer a degree of confidence based on the reputations of the sources it draws from and the agreement among them, and then change its communication style accordingly. Pure LLMs and other architectures may need other solutions.

If we can get generative algorithms to express doubt when they’re not sure they’re right, it will go a long way toward building trust and ameliorating the risk of generating misinformation.

Keep learning!

Andrew

Large language models like Galactica and ChatGPT can spout nonsense in a confident, authoritative tone. This overconfidence – which reflects the data they’re trained on – makes them more likely to mislead.

In contrast, real experts know when to sound confident, and when to let others know they’re at the boundaries of their knowledge. Experts know, and can describe, the boundaries of what they know.

Building large language models that can accurately decide when to be confident and when not to will reduce their risk of misinformation and build trust.

Go deeper in The Batch: https://www.deeplearning.ai/the-batch/issue-174/

What is Google's answer to ChatGPT
What is Google’s answer to ChatGPT

List of ChatGPT's examples, capabilities and limitations

ChatGPT to save time with insurance denials

Tech Buzzwords of 2022, By Google Search Interest

Tech Buzzwords of 2022, By Google Search Interest
Tech Buzzwords of 2022, By Google Search Interest

I just answered a similar question.

Short answer is, “Hahahahahahaha no.”

As I point out in the other answer, Wix has been around over a decade and a half. Squarespace has been around almost two decades. Both offer drag-and-drop web development.

Most people are awful at imagining what they want, much less describing it in English! Even if ChatGPT could produce flawless code (a question which has a similar short answer), the average person couldn’t describe the site they wanted!

The expression a picture is worth a thousand words has never been more relevant. Starting with pages of templates to choose from is so much better than trying to describe a site from scratch, a thousand times better seems like a low estimate.

And I will point out that, despite the existence of drag-and-drop tools that literally any idiot could use, tools that are a thousand times or more easier to use correctly than English, there are still thousands of employed WordPress developers who predominantly create boilerplate sites that literally would be better created in a drag and drop service.

And then there are the more complex sites that drag-and-drop couldn’t create. Guess what? ChatGPT isn’t likely to come close to being able to create the correct code for one.

In a discussion buried in the comments on Quora, I saw someone claim they’d gotten ChatGPT to load a CSV file (a simple text version of a spreadsheet) and to sort the first column. He asked for the answer in Java.

I asked ChatGPT for the same thing in TypeScript.

His response would only have worked on the very most basic CSV files. My response was garbage. Garbage with clear text comments telling me what the code should have been doing, no less.

ChatGPT is really good at what it does, don’t get me wrong. But what it does is fundamentally and profoundly the wrong strategy for software development of any type. Anyone who thinks that “with a little more work” it will be able to take over the jobs of programmers either doesn’t understand what ChatGPT is doing or doesn’t understand what programming is.

Fundamentally, ChatGPT is a magic trick. It understands nothing. At best it’s an idiot-savant that only knows how to pattern match and blend text it’s found online to make it seem like the text should go together. That’s it.

Text, I might add, that isn’t necessarily free of copyright protection. Anything non-trivial that you generate with ChatGPT is currently in a legal grey area. Lawsuits to decide that issue are currently pending, though I suspect we’ll need legislation to really clarify things.

And even then, at best, all you get from ChatGPT is some text! What average Joe will have any clue about what to do with that text?! Web developers also need to know how to set up a development environment and deploy the code to a site. And set up a domain to point to it. And so on.

And regardless, people who hire web developers want someone else to do the work of developing a web site. Even with a drag-and-drop builder, it can take hours to tweak and configure a site, and so they hire someone because they have better things to do!

People hire gardeners to maintain their garden and cut their grass, right? Is that because they don’t know how to do it? Or because they’d rather spend their time doing something else?

Every way you look at it, the best answer to this question is a long, hearty laugh. No AI will replace programmers until AI has effectively human level intelligence. And at that point they may want equal pay as well, so they might just be joining us rather than replacing anyone.

OpenAI is a leading research institute and technology company focused on artificial intelligence development. To develop AI, the organization employs a variety of methods, including machine learning, deep learning, and reinforcement learning.

The use of large-scale, unsupervised learning is one of the key principles underlying OpenAI’s approach to AI development. This means that the company trains its AI models on massive datasets, allowing the models to learn from the data and make predictions and decisions without having to be explicitly programmed to do so. OpenAI’s goal with unsupervised learning is to create AI that can adapt and improve over time, and that can learn to solve complex problems in a more flexible and human-like manner.

Besides that, OpenAI prioritizes safety and transparency in its AI development. The organization is committed to developing AI in an ethical and responsible manner, as well as to ensuring that its AI systems are transparent and understandable and verifiable by humans. This strategy is intended to alleviate concerns about the potential risks and consequences of AI, as well.

It’s hard to tell.

The reason is that we don’t have a good definition of consciousness…nor even a particularly good test for it.

Take a look at the Wikipedia article about “Consciousness”. To quote the introduction:

Consciousness, at its simplest, is sentience or awareness of internal and external existence.

Despite millennia of analyses, definitions, explanations and debates by philosophers and scientists, consciousness remains puzzling and controversial, being “at once the most familiar and [also the] most mysterious aspect of our lives”.

Perhaps the only widely agreed notion about the topic is the intuition that consciousness exists.

Opinions differ about what exactly needs to be studied and explained as consciousness. Sometimes, it is synonymous with the mind, and at other times, an aspect of mind. In the past, it was one’s “inner life”, the world of introspection, of private thought, imagination and volition.

Today, it often includes any kind of cognition, experience, feeling or perception. It may be awareness, awareness of awareness, or self-awareness either continuously changing or not. There might be different levels or orders of consciousness, or different kinds of consciousness, or just one kind with different features.

Other questions include whether only humans are conscious, all animals, or even the whole universe. The disparate range of research, notions and speculations raises doubts about whether the right questions are being asked.

So, given that – what are we to make of OpenAI’s claim?

Just this sentence: “Today, it often includes any kind of cognition, experience, feeling or perception.” could be taken to imply that anything that has cognition or perception is conscious…and that would certainly include a HUGE range of software.

If we can’t decide whether animals are conscious – after half a million years of interactions with them – what chance do we stand with an AI?

Wikipedia also says:

“Experimental research on consciousness presents special difficulties, due to the lack of a universally accepted operational definition.”

Same deal – we don’t have a definition of consciousness – so how the hell can we measure it – and if we can’t do that – is it even meaningful to ASK whether an AI is conscious?

  • if ( askedAboutConsciousness )
  • printf ( “Yes! I am fully conscious!\n” ) ;

This is not convincing!

“In medicine, consciousness is assessed as a combination of verbal behavior, arousal, brain activity and purposeful movement. The last three of these can be used as indicators of consciousness when verbal behavior is absent.”

But, again, we have “chat-bots” that exhibit “verbal behavior”, we have computers that exhibit arousal and neural network software that definitely shows “brain activity” and of course things like my crappy robot vacuum cleaner that can exhibit “purposeful movement” – but these can be fairly simple things that most of us would NOT describe as “conscious”.

CONCLUSION:

I honestly can’t come up with a proper conclusion here. We have a fuzzy definition of a word and an inadequately explained claim to have an instance of something that could be included within that word.

My suggestion – read the whole Wikipedia article – follow up (and read) some of the reference material – decide for yourself.

Well, I asked it directly.

Here’s what it answered:

Should we be scared of ChatGPT?
Should we be scared of ChatGPT?

But, seeing as how people have already found ways to “trick” ChatGPT into doing things that it claims to not be capable of, it would be a matter of time before someone with malicious intent tricked ChatGPT into helping them with illegal activities

Having looked at ChatGPT and its uncanny ability to solve simple coding problems more or less correctly, and also to analyze and make sense of not-so-simple code fragments and spot bugs…

I would say that yes, at least insofar as entry-level programming is concerned, those jobs are seriously in danger of becoming at least partially automated.

What do I do as a project leader of a development project? I assign tasks. I talk to the junior developer and explain, for instance, that I’d like to see a Web page that collects some information from the user and then submits it to a server, with server-side code processing that information and dropping it in a database. Does the junior developer understand my explanation? Is he able to write functionally correct code? Will he recognize common pitfalls? Maybe, maybe not. But it takes time and effort to train him, and there’ll be a lot of uneven performance.

Today, I can ask ChatGPT to do the same and it will instantaneously respond with code that is nearly functional. The code has shortcomings (e.g., prone to SQL injection in one of the examples I tried) but to its credit, ChatGPT warns in its response that its code is not secure. I suppose it would not be terribly hard to train it some more to avoid such common mistakes. Of course the code may not be correct. ChatGPT may have misunderstood my instructions or introduced subtle errors. But how is that different from what a junior human programmer does?

At the same time, ChatGPT is much faster and costs a lot less to run (presently free of course but I presume a commercialized version would cost some money.) Also, it never takes a break, never has a lousy day struggling with a bad hangover from too much partying the previous night, so it is available 24/7, and it will deliver code of consistent quality. Supervision will still be required, in the form of code review, robust testing and all… but that was always the case, also with human programmers.

Of course, being a stateless large language model, ChatGPT can’t do other tasks such as testing and debugging its own code. The code it produces either works or it doesn’t. In its current form, the AI does not learn from its mistakes. But who says it cannot in the future?

Here is a list of three specific examples I threw at ChatGPT that helped shape my opinion:

  • I asked ChatGPT to create a PHP page that collects some information from the user and deposits the result in a MySQL table. Its implementation was textbook example level boring and was quite unsecure (unsanitized user input was directly inserted into SQL query strings) but it correctly understood my request, produced correct code in return, and explained its code including its shortcomings coherently;
  • I asked ChatGPT to analyze a piece of code I wrote many years ago, about 30 lines, enumerating running processes on a Linux host in a nonstandard way, to help uncover nefarious processes that attempt to hide themselves from being listed by the ps utility. ChatGPT correctly described the functionality of my obscure code, and even offered the opinion (which I humbly accepted) that it was basically a homebrew project (which it is) not necessarily suitable for a production environment;
  • I asked ChatGPT to analyze another piece of code that uses an obscure graphics algorithm to draw simple geometric shapes like lines and circles without using floating point math or even multiplication. (Such algorithms were essential decades ago on simple hardware, e.g., back in the world of 8-bit computers.) The example code, which I wrote, generated a circle and printed it on the console in the form of ASCII graphics, multiple lines with X-es in the right place representing the circle. ChatGPT correctly recognized the algorithm and correctly described the functionality of the program.

I was especially impressed by its ability to make sense of the programmer’s intent.

Overall (to use the catch phrase that ChatGPT preferably uses as it begins its concluding paragraph in many of its answers) I think AI like ChatGPT represents a serious challenge to entry-level programming jobs. Higher-level jobs are not yet in danger. Conceptually understanding a complex system, mapping out a solution, planning and cosing out a project, managing its development, ensuring its security with a full understanding of security concerns, responsibilities, avoidance and mitigation strategies… I don’t think AI is quite there yet. But routine programming tasks, like using a Web template and turning it into something simple and interactive with back-end code that stores and retrieves data from a database? Looks like it’s already happening.

According to the estimate of Lambda Labs, training the 175-billion-parameter neural network requires 3.114E23 FLOPS (floating-point operation), which would theoretically take 355 years on a V100 GPU server with 28 TFLOPS capacity and would cost $4.6 million at $1.5 per hour.

Training the final deep learning model is just one of several steps in the development of GPT-3. Before that, the AI researchers had to gradually increase layers and parameters, and fiddle with the many hyperparameters of the language model until they reached the right configuration. That trial-and-error gets more and more expensive as the neural network grows.

We can’t know the exact cost of the research without more information from OpenAI, but one expert estimated it to be somewhere between 1.5 and five times the cost of training the final model.

This would put the cost of research and development between $11.5 million and $27.6 million, plus the overhead of parallel GPUs.

In the GPT-3 whitepaper, OpenAI introduced eight different versions of the language model

GPT-3 is not any AI, but a statistic language model which mindlessly quickly creates human-like written text using machine learning technologies, having zero understanding of the context.

The GPT-3 economy

Here are 8 ways ChatGPT can save you thousand of hours in 2023

1- Substitute for google search

While ChatGPT is lacking info beyond 2021 and is occasionally incorrect and bias, many users leverage its ability to:

  • Answer specific questions
  • simplify complicated topics

All with an added bonus – no ads

2- Study Partner

Type “learn”, then paste a a link to your online textbook (or individual chapters).

Ask Chatbot to provide questions based on your textbook.

Boom.

Now you have a virtual study buddy.

3- Train YOUR OWN Chatbot

I bet you didn’t know it is possible to :

  • Integrate ChatGPT into your website
  • Train it with customized information

The result:

A virtual customer service bot that can hold a conversation and answer questions (meaningfully).

4- Counsellor

When it comes to turbulent personal questions, Chatbot may spit out a disclaimer, but it will also give you straightforward and actionable advice.

5- Coding

ChatGPT is opening the development of:

  • Apps
  • Games
  • Websites

to virtually everyone.

It’s a lengthy and technical process, but all you need is a killer idea and the right prompts.

Bonus: It also de-bugs your existing code for you.

6- Outline your content marketing strategy

7- Craft all your marketing materials

8- Creative Writing

A list for those who write code:

1. Explaining code: Take some code you want to understand and ask ChatGPT to explain it.

2. Improve existing code: Ask ChatGPT to improve existing code by describing what you want to accomplish. It will give you instructions about how to do it, including the modified code.

3. Rewriting code using the correct style: This is great when refactoring code written by non-native Python developers who used a different naming convention. ChatGPT not only gives you the updated code; it also explains the reason for the changes.

4. Rewriting code using idiomatic constructs: Very helpful when reviewing and refactoring code written by non-native Python developers.

5. Simplifying code: Ask ChatGPT to simplify complex code. The result will be a much more compact version of the original code.

6. Writing test cases: Ask it to help you test a function, and it will write test cases for you.

7. Exploring alternatives: ChatGPT told me its Quick Sort implementation wasn’t the most efficient, so I asked for an alternative implementation. This is great when you want to explore different ways to accomplish the same thing.

8. Writing documentation: Ask ChatGPT to write the documentation for a piece of code, and it usually does a great job. It even includes usage examples as part of the documentation!

9. Tracking down bugs: If you are having trouble finding a bug in your code, ask ChatGPT for help.

Something to keep in mind:

I have 2+ decades of programming experience. I like to think I know what I’m doing. I don’t trust people’s code (especially mine,) and I surely don’t trust ChatGPT’s output.

This is not about letting ChatGPT do my work. This is about using it to 10x my output.

ChatGPT is flawed. I find it makes mistakes when dealing with code, but that’s why I’m here: to supervise it. Together we form a more perfect Union. (Sorry, couldn’t help it)

Developers who shit on this are missing the point. The story is not about ChatGPT taking programmers’ jobs. It’s not about a missing import here or a subtle mistake there.

The story is how, overnight, AI gives programmers a 100x boost.

Ignore this at your own peril.

ChatGPT is “simply” a fined-tuned GPT-3 model with a surprisingly small amount of data! Moreover, InstructGPT (ChatGPT’s sibling model) seems to be using 1.3B parameters where GPT-3 uses 175B parameters! It is first fine-tuned with supervised learning and then further fine-tuned with reinforcement learning. They hired 40 human labelers to generate the training data. Let’s dig into it!

– First, they started by a pre-trained GPT-3 model trained on a broad distribution of Internet data (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165.pdf). Then sampled typical human prompts used for GPT collected from the OpenAI website and asked labelers and customers to write down the correct output. They fine-tuned the model with 12,725 labeled data.

– Then, they sampled human prompts and generated multiple outputs from the model. A labeler is then asked to rank those outputs. The resulting data is used to train a Reward model (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.01325.pdf) with 33,207 prompts and ~10 times more training samples using different combination of the ranked outputs.

– We then sample more human prompts and they are used to fine-tuned the supervised fine-tuned model with Proximal Policy Optimization algorithm (PPO) (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.06347.pdf). The prompt is fed to the PPO model, the Reward model generates a reward value, and the PPO model is iteratively fine-tuned using the rewards and the prompts using 31,144 prompts data.

This process is fully described in here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.02155.pdf. The paper actually details a model called InstructGPT which is described by OpenAI as a “sibling model”, so the numbers shown above are likely to be somewhat different.

Follow me for more Machine Learning content!

#machinelearning #datascience #ChatGPT

People have already started building awesome apps on top of #ChatGPT: 10 use cases 
1. Connect your ChatGPT with your Whatsapp.
Link: https://github.com/danielgross/whatsapp-gpt

2. ChatGPT Writer : It use ChatGPT to generate emails or replies based on your prompt!
Link: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/chatgpt-writer-email-writ/pdnenlnelpdomajfejgapbdpmjkfpjkp/related

3. WebChatGPT: WebChatGPT (https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/webchatgpt/lpfemeioodjbpieminkklglpmhlngfcn) gives you relevant results from the web!

4. YouTube Summary with ChatGPT: It generate text summaries of any YouTube video!
Link: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/youtube-summary-with-chat/nmmicjeknamkfloonkhhcjmomieiodli/related

5. TweetGPT: It uses ChatGPT to write your tweets, reply, comment, etc.
Link: https://github.com/yaroslav-n/tweetGPT

6. Search GPT: It display the ChatGPT response alongside Google Search results
Link: https://github.com/wong2/chat-gpt-google-extension

7. ChatGPT or all search engines: You can now view ChatGPT responses on Google and Bing!
Link: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/chatgpt-for-search-engine/feeonheemodpkdckaljcjogdncpiiban?ref=producthunt

8. Save all your Prompts?: The `ChatGPT History` extension has you covered!
Link: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/chatgpt-prompt-genius/jjdnakkfjnnbbckhifcfchagnpofjffo

9. Remake a video: Just pick a video you liked and visit https://lnkd.in/e_GD2reT to get its transcript. Once done, bring that back to Chat GPT and tell it to summarize the transcript. Read the summary and make a video on that yourself.

10. Search what people are Prompting with FlowGPT
Link: https://flowgpt.com

#searchengines #people #building #google #comment #video #writer

What solutions have been proposed to improve the accuracy of AI generated questions and answers?

There are a number of approaches that have been proposed to improve the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) generated questions and answers. Here are a few examples:

  1. Data quality: One important factor in the accuracy of AI generated questions and answers is the quality of the data used to train the AI system. Ensuring that the data is diverse, relevant, and accurately labeled can help to improve the accuracy of the AI system.
  2. Training methods: Different training methods can also impact the accuracy of AI generated questions and answers. For example, using more advanced techniques such as transfer learning or fine-tuning can help to improve the performance of the AI system.
  3. Human oversight: Another approach that has been proposed to improve the accuracy of AI generated questions and answers is to include some level of human oversight or review. For example, the AI system could be designed to flag potentially problematic or inaccurate questions and answers for further review by a human expert.
  4. Explainable AI: Another approach that has been proposed is to develop AI systems that are more transparent and explainable, so that it is easier to understand how the AI system arrived at a particular answer or decision. This can help to improve the trustworthiness and accountability of the AI system.

Overall, there is ongoing research and development in this area, and it is likely that a combination of these and other approaches will be needed to improve the accuracy of AI generated questions and answers.

ChatGPT for CyberSecurity

The concept behind ChatGPT

ChatGPT is a chatbot designed to understand and generate human-like language through the use of natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques. It is based on the GPT (Generative Pre-training Transformer) language model developed by OpenAI, which has been trained on a large dataset of human language in order to better understand how humans communicate.

One of the key concepts behind ChatGPT is the idea of language generation. This refers to the ability of the chatbot to produce coherent and coherently structured responses to user input. To do this, ChatGPT uses a number of different techniques, including natural language generation algorithms, machine learning models, and artificial neural networks. These techniques allow ChatGPT to understand the context and meaning of user input, and generate appropriate responses based on that understanding.

Another important concept behind ChatGPT is the idea of natural language processing (NLP). This refers to the ability of the chatbot to understand and interpret human language, and respond to user input in a way that is natural and easy for humans to understand. NLP is a complex field that involves a number of different techniques and algorithms, including syntactic analysis, semantic analysis, and discourse analysis. By using these techniques, ChatGPT is able to understand the meaning of user input and generate appropriate responses based on that understanding.

Finally, ChatGPT is based on the concept of machine learning, which refers to the ability of computers to learn and adapt to new data and situations. Through the use of machine learning algorithms and models, ChatGPT is able to continually improve its understanding of human language and communication, and generate more human-like responses over time.

GPT-4 is going to launch soon.

And it will make ChatGPT look like a toy…

→ GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters
→ GPT-4 has 100 trillion parameters

I think we’re gonna see something absolutely mindblowing this time!

And the best part? 👇

Average developers (like myself), who are not AI or machine learning experts, will get to use this powerful technology through a simple API.

Think about this for a second…

It’s the most powerful, cutting-edge technology *in the world*, available through a Low-Code solution!

If you’re not already planning on starting an AI-based SaaS or thinking about how to build AI into your current solution…

👉 Start now!

Cause this is gonna be one of the biggest opportunities of this century 🚀#technology #opportunities #ai #machinelearning #planning

No alternative text description for this image

Google unveils its ChatGPT rival

Google on Monday unveiled a new chatbot tool dubbed “Bard” in an apparent bid to compete with the viral success of ChatGPT.

Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google and parent company Alphabet, said in a blog post that Bard will be opened up to “trusted testers” starting Monday February 06th, 2023, with plans to make it available to the public “in the coming weeks.”

Like ChatGPT, which was released publicly in late November by AI research company OpenAI, Bard is built on a large language model. These models are trained on vast troves of data online in order to generate compelling responses to user prompts.

“Bard seeks to combine the breadth of the world’s knowledge with the power, intelligence and creativity of our large language models,” Pichai wrote. “It draws on information from the web to provide fresh, high-quality responses.”

The announcement comes as Google’s core product – online search – is widely thought to be facing its most significant risk in years. In the two months since it launched to the public, ChatGPT has been used to generate essays, stories and song lyrics, and to answer some questions one might previously have searched for on Google.

The immense attention on ChatGPT has reportedly prompted Google’s management to declare a “code red” situation for its search business. In a tweet last year, Paul Buchheit, one of the creators of Gmail, forewarned that Google “may be only a year or two away from total disruption” due to the rise of AI.

Microsoft, which has confirmed plans to invest billions OpenAI, has already said it would incorporate the tool into some of its products – and it is rumored to be planning to integrate it into its search engine, Bing. Microsoft on Tuesday is set to hold a news event at its Washington headquarters, the topic of which has yet to be announced. Microsoft publicly announced the event shortly after Google’s AI news dropped on Monday.

The underlying technology that supports Bard has been around for some time, though not widely available to the public. Google unveiled its Language Model for Dialogue Applications (or LaMDA) some two years ago, and said Monday that this technology will power Bard. LaMDA made headlines late last year when a former Google engineer claimed the chatbot was “sentient.” His claims were widely criticized in the AI community.

In the post Monday, Google offered the example of a user asking Bard to explain new discoveries made by NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope in a way that a 9-year-old might find interesting. Bard responds with conversational bullet-points. The first one reads: “In 2023, The JWST spotted a number of galaxies nicknamed ‘green peas.’ They were given this name because they are small, round, and green, like peas.”

Bard can be used to plan a friend’s baby shower, compare two Oscar-nominated movies or get lunch ideas based on what’s in your fridge, according to the post from Google.

Pichai also said Monday that AI-powered tools will soon begin rolling out on Google’s flagship Search tool.

“Soon, you’ll see AI-powered features in Search that distill complex information and multiple perspectives into easy-to-digest formats, so you can quickly understand the big picture and learn more from the web,” Pichai wrote, “whether that’s seeking out additional perspectives, like blogs from people who play both piano and guitar, or going deeper on a related topic, like steps to get started as a beginner.”

If Google does move more in the direction of incorporating an AI chatbot tool into search, it could come with some risks. Because these tools are trained on data online, experts have noted they have the potential to perpetuate biases and spread misinformation.

“It’s critical,” Pichai wrote in his post, “that we bring experiences rooted in these models to the world in a bold and responsible way.”

Read more at https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/06/tech/google-bard-chatgpt-rival

ChatGPT-4

chatGPT4

  • [D] How can I survive the math part in my Master's program?
    by /u/meep1004 (Machine Learning) on March 28, 2024 at 12:11 am

    Hi! So I am currently doing a Masters in Data Science naively thinking that it is going to be the trend for the future job market, you know, data scientists, machine learning, AI,....and it is not going to be that bad because I worked as a software engineer before so coding should be no problem.......Which is kinda true I have aced most my coding and technical classes in my degree program so far, EXCEPT the remaining 50% are some of the most hardcard statistics, linear algebra, calculus,.....I have ever seen in my freaking life....to give you some context, I have not touched math ever since high school which was 10 years ago and when I began my program I don't even know what the sigma sign is So I am getting kinda depressed as I have to drag my souls through all these courses as it's like the professor is preaching Chinese and Egyptians to me. And I feel so much peer pressure because I usually don't understand the lecture right away usually took me extra 2-3 hours study to understand while my friends take like maybe less than an hour since they mostly have engineering statistics or math related bachelors background So for any kind souls on here how can I cope with Math necessary for Data Science and Machine Learning in general? I feel like my brain is not designed to understand all these complex time series model etc........I also feel bleak considering this is what I am going to be doing in the future, how much math would be really used once I graduated and tried to find a job in the industry? submitted by /u/meep1004 [link] [comments]

  • [D] Are data structures and leetcode needed for Machine Learning Researcher/Engineer jobs and interviews?
    by /u/deadknxght (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 11:22 pm

    Title submitted by /u/deadknxght [link] [comments]

  • [P] deit3-jax: A codebase for training ViTs on TPUs
    by /u/affjljoo3581 (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 9:54 pm

    Hey all, I have written a codebase to train ViTs by following DeiT and DeiT-III recipes. As they are strong baselines to train vanilla ViTs, it is necessary to reproduce to adopt to the variant research. However, the original repository is implemented in PyTorch, it is impossible to run on TPUs. Therefore I re-implemented the simple ViT training codebase with DeiT and DeiT-III training recipes. Here is my repository: https://github.com/affjljoo3581/deit3-jax. I used Jax/Flax and webdataset to build a TPU-friendly training environment. Below are the reproduction results: DeiT Reproduction Name Data Resolution Epochs Time Reimpl. Original Config Wandb Model T/16 in1k 224 300 2h 40m 73.1% 72.2% config log ckpt S/16 in1k 224 300 2h 43m 79.68% 79.8% config log ckpt B/16 in1k 224 300 4h 40m 81.46% 81.8% config log ckpt DeiT-III on ImageNet-1k Name Data Resolution Epochs Time Reimpl. Original Config Wandb Model S/16 in1k 224 400 2h 38m 80.7% 80.4% config log ckpt S/16 in1k 224 800 5h 19m 81.44% 81.4% config log ckpt B/16 in1k 192 → 224 400 4h 42m 83.6% 83.5% pt / ft pt / ft pt / ft B/16 in1k 192 → 224 800 9h 28m 83.91% 83.8% pt / ft pt / ft pt / ft L/16 in1k 192 → 224 400 14h 10m 84.62% 84.5% pt / ft pt / ft pt / ft L/16 in1k 192 → 224 800 - - 84.9% pt / ft - - H/14 in1k 154 → 224 400 19h 10m 85.12% 85.1% pt / ft pt / ft pt / ft H/14 in1k 154 → 224 800 - - 85.2% pt / ft - - DeiT-III on ImageNet-21k Name Data Resolution Epochs Time Reimpl. Original Config Wandb Model S/16 in21k 224 90 7h 30m 83.04% 82.6% pt / ft pt / ft pt / ft S/16 in21k 224 240 20h 6m 83.39% 83.1% pt / ft pt / ft pt / ft B/16 in21k 224 90 12h 12m 85.35% 85.2% pt / ft pt / ft pt / ft B/16 in21k 224 240 33h 9m 85.68% 85.7% pt / ft pt / ft pt / ft L/16 in21k 224 90 37h 13m 86.83% 86.8% pt / ft pt / ft pt / ft L/16 in21k 224 240 - - 87% pt / ft - - H/14 in21k 126 → 224 90 35h 51m 86.78% 87.2% pt / ft pt / ft pt / ft H/14 in21k 126 → 224 240 - - - pt / ft - - I trained all models on TPU v4-64 Pod slice, provided by the TRC program. I uploaded the checkpoints to the huggingface hub and you can also see the training logs on wandb. For more details, please check out my repository. submitted by /u/affjljoo3581 [link] [comments]

  • [D] Local LLM Models can learn while using them?
    by /u/m1nusgg (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 8:22 pm

    Is there a local LLM model that learns as it is used? submitted by /u/m1nusgg [link] [comments]

  • [D] Dataloading from external disk
    by /u/bkffadia (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 6:17 pm

    Hey there, I am training a deep lesrning model using a dataset of 400Go in an external SSD disk and I noticed that training is very slow, any tricks to make dataloading faster ? PS : I have to use the external disk submitted by /u/bkffadia [link] [comments]

  • [D] How do you measure performance of AI copilot/assistant?
    by /u/n2parko (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 5:38 pm

    Curious to hear from those that are building and deploying products with AI copilots. How are you tracking the interactions? And are you feeding the interaction back into the model for retraining? Put together a how-to to do this with an OS Copilot (Vercel AI SDK) and Segment and would love any feedback to improve the spec: https://segment.com/blog/instrumenting-user-insights-for-your-ai-copilot/ submitted by /u/n2parko [link] [comments]

  • [D] What is the state-of-the-art for 1D signal cleanup?
    by /u/XmintMusic (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 4:52 pm

    I have the following problem. Imagine I have a 'supervised' dataset of 1D curves with inputs and outputs, where the input is a modulated noisy signal and the output is the cleaned desired signal. Is there a consensus in the machine learning community on how to tackle this simple problem? Have you ever worked on anything similar? What algorithm did you end up using? Example: https://imgur.com/JYgkXEe submitted by /u/XmintMusic [link] [comments]

  • [D] State of the art TTS
    by /u/Zireaone (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 3:04 pm

    State of the art Tts question Hey! I'm currently working on a project and I'd like to implement speech using TTS, I tried many things and I can't seem to find something that fits my needs, I haven't worked on TTS for a while now so I was wondering if maybe they were newer technologies I could use. Here is what I'm looking for : I need to be be quite fast and without too many sound artifacts (I tried bark and while the possibility of manipulating emotion is quite remarkable the generated voice is full of artifacts and noise) It'd be a bonus if I could stream the audio and pipe it through other things, I'd like to apply an RVC Model on top of it (live) Another 'nice to have' is to have some controls over the emotions or tone of the voice. I tried these so far (either myself or through demos) : TORTOISETTS and EDGETTS seem to have a nice voice quality but are relatively monotone. Bark as I said is very good at emotions and controls but lots of artifacts in the voice, if I have time I'd try to apply postprocessing but idk to what extent it can help OpenAI models don't have much emotions IMO Same as eleven labs I used Uber duck in the past but it seems a lot of fun functionalities disappeared. If you have any advice, suggestion or if you think I should try somethings further feel free to reply! I also want to thanks everyone in advance! Have a nice day! submitted by /u/Zireaone [link] [comments]

  • [D] Data cleaning for classification model
    by /u/fardin__khan (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 2:42 pm

    Currently working on a classification model, which entails data cleaning. We've got 8000 images categorized into 3 classes. After removing duplicates and corrupted images, what else should we consider? submitted by /u/fardin__khan [link] [comments]

  • [D] Seeking guidance/advice
    by /u/qheeeee (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 2:14 pm

    Hi, I've finished Andrew Ng's course on Coursera. I think I've got the basics. I've started learning ML for my master's thesis. I want to develop a method to estimate scope 3 emissions. I studied business and I do not have any python background except for a 6-month data analytics bootcamp. I've got the data needed for my thesis, but when I try to work on it, I'm not sure what I'm doing, and ofc a sh*t ton of bugs and errors. Do I need to just keep trying to push through and learn through the experience by working on my thesis or do I need to study more? I've been considering to by a book <\Hands-on Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow> by Aurelien Geron. Any guidance/recommendation would be much appreciated! submitted by /u/qheeeee [link] [comments]

  • [P] Insta Face Swap
    by /u/abdullahozmntr (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 2:03 pm

    ComfyUI node repo: https://github.com/abdozmantar/ComfyUI-InstaSwap Standalone repo: https://github.com/abdozmantar/Standalone-InstaSwap ​ ​ https://i.redd.it/9d4ti20fvvqc1.gif submitted by /u/abdullahozmntr [link] [comments]

  • [D] Seeking Advice
    by /u/MD24IB (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 1:45 pm

    I'm currently pursuing my undergraduate degree in robotics engineering and have been immersing myself in concepts related to machine learning, deep learning, and computer vision, both modern and traditional. With strong programming skills and a habit of regularly reading research papers, I'm eager to understand the job landscape in my field and pursue a Phd. Are there ample opportunities available? What can I expect in terms of salaries and future prospects? Additionally, I'm curious about the comparative job market between natural language processing (NLP) and computer vision. Given my background and interests, what areas or skills should I focus on learning to enhance my career prospects? Thanks in advance for your time and advice. submitted by /u/MD24IB [link] [comments]

  • [N] Introducing DBRX: A New Standard for Open LLM
    by /u/artificial_intelect (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 1:35 pm

    https://x.com/vitaliychiley/status/1772958872891752868?s=20 Shill disclaimer: I was the pretraining lead for the project DBRX deets: 16 Experts (12B params per single expert; top_k=4 routing) 36B active params (132B total params) trained for 12T tokens 32k sequence length training submitted by /u/artificial_intelect [link] [comments]

  • [D] Seeking Advice: Transitioning to Low-Level Implementations in AIoT Systems - Where to Start?
    by /u/MaTwickenham (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 1:20 pm

    Hello everyone, I'm a prospective graduate student who will be starting my studies in September this year, specializing in AIoT (Artificial Intelligence of Things) Systems. Recently, I've been reading papers from journals like INFOCOM and SIGCOMM, and I've noticed that they mostly focus on relatively low-level aspects of operating systems, including GPU/CPU scheduling, optimization of deep learning model inference, operator optimization, cross-platform migration, and deployment. I find it challenging to grasp the implementation details of these works at the code level. When I looked at the implementations of these works uploaded on GitHub, I found it relatively difficult to understand. My primary programming languages are Java and Python. During my undergraduate studies, I gained proficiency in implementing engineering projects and ideas using Python, especially in the fields of deep learning and machine learning. However, I lack experience and familiarity with C/C++ (many of the aforementioned works are based on C/C++). Therefore, I would like to ask for advice from senior professionals and friends on which areas of knowledge I should focus on. Do I need to learn CUDA programming, operating system programming, or other directions? Any recommended learning paths would be greatly appreciated. PS: Recently, I have started studying the MIT 6.S081 Operating System Engineering course. Thank you all sincerely for your advice. submitted by /u/MaTwickenham [link] [comments]

  • [P] Run AI & ML workflows locally from your Mac desktop
    by /u/creatorai (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 1:08 pm

    Hi all - I wanted to share an app I’ve been working on with a small team over the past year that I thought this community would be interested in. Odyssey is a completely native Mac app for creating remarkable art, getting work done, and automating repetitive tasks with the power of AI and machine learning models. We just made a major feature update and added the ability to create your own Widgets. Odyssey Widgets are fully interactive mini applications that live in their own windows or panels and are driven by a workflow. This means you can take a workflow you create with Odyssey and add it directly to your desktop. So, as an example, you could generate an image, chat with locally run chatbot, run bulk image processing, etc. straight from your desktop without even opening the Odyssey app. Widgets can be built with Odyssey and triggered from the Odyssey logo in your Mac’s menu. https://i.redd.it/8s9s6i0clvqc1.gif We're in public beta but here's a full list of everything Odyssey supports: Image generation and processing Run Stable Diffusion 1.5, SDXL, SDXL Lightning, and SDXL Turbo locally or connect your Stable Diffusion API key Add custom models & LoRAs ControlNet support including canny edges, pose detection, depth estimation, and QR Code Monster Inpainting and outpainting Super resolution models (Best Buddy GAN, Ultrasharp 4x, Remacri, and ESRGAN) Multiple image segmentation models Erase objects Dozens of image processing nodes including aspect ratio, resizing, and extracting dominant colors Custom image transitions for powerful slideshows Large language models and math equations Run Llama2 locally or connect your ChatGPT API key Supports both chatbot mode and instructions mode Solver node for word problems and math nodes for complex equations Lots of updates coming here in the next few weeks Automation and batch workflows Batch image and text nodes support hundreds of images and lines of text at once Remove backgrounds, upscale, change aspect ratios, and run dozens of image processors in bulk Private, customizable, and shareable No images, chats, or inputs are stored or accessible by the Odyssey team Completely private and secure. The only tracking is anonymized usage data to help us improve Odyssey Process your own data entirely locally No internet connection required to run local models Use your own API keys for ChatGPT and Stable Diffusion Easily save and share custom workflows What’s coming soon: Custom LLMs & more text processing nodes - we are adding support for bringing in custom LLMs, document uploads, and more Batch text and workflow automation - we are building in document upload, batch text support, and an integration with Apple shortcuts Plug-in support - we are opening up the Odyssey to 3P developers. If you’re interested, please reach out - would love to learn more from you as we work on building this out Feel free to reach out to [john@odysseyapp.io](mailto:john@odysseyapp.io) if you have any questions or feedback. submitted by /u/creatorai [link] [comments]

  • [P] Hybrid-Net: Real-time audio source separation, generate lyrics, chords, beat.
    by /u/CheekProfessional146 (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 12:11 pm

    Project: https://github.com/DoMusic/Hybrid-Net A transformer-based hybrid multimodal model, various transformer models address different problems in the field of music information retrieval, these models generate corresponding information dependencies that mutually influence each other. An AI-powered multimodal project focused on music, generate chords, beats, lyrics, melody, and tabs for any song. submitted by /u/CheekProfessional146 [link] [comments]

  • [P] Visualize RAG Data
    by /u/DocBrownMS (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 10:29 am

    Hey all, I've recently published a tutorial at Towards Data Science that explores a somewhat overlooked aspect of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems: the visualization of documents and questions in the embedding space: https://towardsdatascience.com/visualize-your-rag-data-evaluate-your-retrieval-augmented-generation-system-with-ragas-fc2486308557 While much of the focus in RAG discussions tends to be on the algorithms and data processing, I believe that visualization can help to explore the data and to gain insights into problematic subgroups within the data. This might be interesting for some of you, although I'm aware that not everyone is keen on this kind of visualization. I believe it can add a unique dimension to understanding RAG systems. submitted by /u/DocBrownMS [link] [comments]

  • [D] Any open-source way to make AI lip-syncing this good?
    by /u/MorningHerald (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 5:23 am

    How can I create AI lip syncing as good as this? https://imgur.com/Uw89El8 Which tools - open-source, free or paid - are best? What options are there currently. submitted by /u/MorningHerald [link] [comments]

  • [D] Is Synthetic Data a Reliable Option for Training Machine Learning Models?
    by /u/Data_Nerd1979 (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 3:49 am

    "The most obvious advantage of synthetic data is that it contains no personally identifiable information (PII). Consequently, it doesn’t pose the same cybersecurity risks as conventional data science projects. However, the big question for machine learning is whether this information is reliable enough to produce functioning ML models." Very informative blog regarding Using Synthetic Data in Machine Learning, source here https://opendatascience.com/is-synthetic-data-a-reliable-option-for-training-machine-learning-models/ submitted by /u/Data_Nerd1979 [link] [comments]

  • [R] AIOS: LLM Agent Operating System
    by /u/TouchLive4686 (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 1:00 am

    Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.16971 Github: https://github.com/agiresearch/AIOS Abstract: The integration and deployment of large language model (LLM)-based intelligent agents have been fraught with challenges that compromise their efficiency and efficacy. Among these issues are sub-optimal scheduling and resource allocation of agent requests over the LLM, the difficulties in maintaining context during interactions between agent and LLM, and the complexities inherent in integrating heterogeneous agents with different capabilities and specializations. The rapid increase of agent quantity and complexity further exacerbates these issues, often leading to bottlenecks and sub-optimal utilization of resources. Inspired by these challenges, this paper presents AIOS, an LLM agent operating system, which embeds large language model into operating systems (OS) as the brain of the OS, enabling an operating system "with soul" -- an important step towards AGI. Specifically, AIOS is designed to optimize resource allocation, facilitate context switch across agents, enable concurrent execution of agents, provide tool service for agents, and maintain access control for agents. We present the architecture of such an operating system, outline the core challenges it aims to resolve, and provide the basic design and implementation of the AIOS. Our experiments on concurrent execution of multiple agents demonstrate the reliability and efficiency of our AIOS modules. Through this, we aim to not only improve the performance and efficiency of LLM agents but also to pioneer for better development and deployment of the AIOS ecosystem in the future. An overview of the AIOS architecture. submitted by /u/TouchLive4686 [link] [comments]

  • PyTorch Dataloader Optimizations [D]
    by /u/MuscleML (Machine Learning) on March 27, 2024 at 12:13 am

    What are some optimizations that one could use for the data loader in PyTorch? The data type could be anything. But I primarily work with images and text. We know you can define your own. But does anyone have any clever tricks to share? Thank you in advance! submitted by /u/MuscleML [link] [comments]

  • ACL 2024 Reviews [Discussion]
    by /u/EDEN1998 (Machine Learning) on March 26, 2024 at 5:55 pm

    Discussion thread of ACL 2024 (ARR Feb) reviews. I got 3, 3, 4 for soundness. How about you guys? submitted by /u/EDEN1998 [link] [comments]

  • [R] Zero Mean Leaky ReLu
    by /u/1nyouendo (Machine Learning) on March 26, 2024 at 1:55 pm

    Hi, At the risk of groans of "not another ReLu activation function variant", I thought I'd share a simple trick to make the (Leaky)ReLu better behaved, in particular to address criticism about the (Leaky)ReLu not being zero-centred. The simple trick is to offset the (Leaky)ReLu unit by the expectation of the output under a zero-mean normally distributed input: Zero Mean Leaky ReLu: y(x) = max(x, a*x) - k k=((1 - a)*s)/sqrt(2*pi) y' = a, for y<-k, 1 otherwise The resulting activation function is still cheap to compute. It also seems to make the vanilla ReLu (a=0) better behaved. The standard deviation should be chosen based on what you expect it to be given your weight initialisation scheme. If in doubt, s=1 is a good start. I'm currently working on a paper on sparse optimisation, and this small offset improved the margin by which my model beat current state-of-the-art. However, since it's not actually part of the core innovation, I thought I'd share! Mark ​ https://preview.redd.it/ksasmdsuooqc1.png?width=258&format=png&auto=webp&s=7113f32a906304563ed99be0c23c525cbde4be6f ​ Example graph for a=1/10, s=1 ​ https://preview.redd.it/2y10rttv8pqc1.png?width=653&format=png&auto=webp&s=64cdaeb0dca6efca5b97a71a59ad28a88160e316 ​ ***** EDIT ***** After it was suggested that I could add a scalar to this activation function to also make it unit variance, I did just that and came up with the Standardised Leaky ReLu (SLReLu) below. However, whilst this does indeed give the same output variance, the scaled version is more likely to suffer instability when the input mean goes above zero. Whereas SELU's lambda scalar is a little over unity (at ~1.0507), the scalar for SLReLu is as high as ~1.7129 sigma for the ReLu case where alpha=0. https://preview.redd.it/5namvigxavqc1.png?width=356&format=png&auto=webp&s=0e025474fb598b20404657c59a429a6a39297d52 submitted by /u/1nyouendo [link] [comments]

  • [D] What do the responsibilities of a typical “research scientist” in big tech companies look like? And what determines if you are going to be able to continue publishing papers in this role (going in after a PhD)?
    by /u/Yalkim (Machine Learning) on March 26, 2024 at 4:36 am

    I am interviewing for such a role in a big tech company. I applied through an ad that said “ml research scientist”. I would love to continue doing research and publishing papers. I have seen a lot of research scientists in this company who publish quite a bit every year. But something tells me not every “research scientist” is going to be in that kind of a position. So what determines if the type of work/responsibilities/freedoms I will receive? Specifically what determines if I will be free to do research and publish versus doing internal company stuff? submitted by /u/Yalkim [link] [comments]

  • [R] Up to 17% of Recent AI Conference Peer Reviews Written by ChatGPT
    by /u/Successful-Western27 (Machine Learning) on March 25, 2024 at 11:36 pm

    A new study has uncovered that a significant fraction of peer reviews for top AI conferences in 2023-2024 likely included substantial AI-generated content from models like ChatGPT. Using a novel statistical technique, researchers estimated the percentage of text generated by AI in large collections of documents. Analyzing peer reviews, they found: 10.6% of ICLR 2024 reviews had significant AI content 9.1% for NeurIPS 2023 6.5% for CoRL 2023 16.9% for EMNLP 2023 In contrast, only 1-2% of pre-ChatGPT reviews from 2022 and earlier were flagged as having substantial AI contribution. Some key findings: AI-heavy reviews tended to come in close to the deadline Fewer scholarly citations in AI-flavored reviews Reviewers with AI-tinged reviews engaged less in author discussion AI content made reviews more semantically homogeneous Lower reviewer confidence correlated with higher AI estimates The study, I think, raises some questions for proactive policy development in academia around responsible AI use in research. AI may be eroding the quality and integrity of peer review through these "shadow" influences. Open questions include: Should AI assistance in peer review be disclosed? How should we incentivize good practices despite AI temptations? Can we preserve intellectual diversity under AI homogenization? Should we rethink credit for hybrid human/AI knowledge work? Overall, an interesting empirical glimpse into AI's rapidly growing tendrils in the foundations of scientific quality control! I thought the approach of measuring the frequency of certain AI wording "ticks" made a lot of sense (some of the adjectives GPT4 uses, for example, are clear tells). I'm curious to read the comments on this one! I have a much more detailed summary available here as well if you're interested, and the original paper is here. submitted by /u/Successful-Western27 [link] [comments]

  • [D] Simple Questions Thread
    by /u/AutoModerator (Machine Learning) on March 24, 2024 at 3:00 pm

    Please post your questions here instead of creating a new thread. Encourage others who create new posts for questions to post here instead! Thread will stay alive until next one so keep posting after the date in the title. Thanks to everyone for answering questions in the previous thread! submitted by /u/AutoModerator [link] [comments]

References:

1- https://vikaskulhari.medium.com/chatgpt-end-of-google-f6a958f38ac2

2- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meena 

3- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT

4- https://ai.googleblog.com/2020/01/towards-conversational-agent-that-can.html

5- https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/

6- https://djamgaai.web.app

7- https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7008020246934482945?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

8- https://enoumen.com/2023/02/11/artificial-intelligence-frequently-asked-questions/

Pass the 2023 AWS Cloud Practitioner CCP CLF-C02 Certification with flying colors Ace the 2023 AWS Solutions Architect Associate SAA-C03 Exam with Confidence Pass the 2023 AWS Certified Machine Learning Specialty MLS-C01 Exam with Flying Colors

List of Freely available programming books - What is the single most influential book every Programmers should read



#BlackOwned #BlackEntrepreneurs #BlackBuniness #AWSCertified #AWSCloudPractitioner #AWSCertification #AWSCLFC02 #CloudComputing #AWSStudyGuide #AWSTraining #AWSCareer #AWSExamPrep #AWSCommunity #AWSEducation #AWSBasics #AWSCertified #AWSMachineLearning #AWSCertification #AWSSpecialty #MachineLearning #AWSStudyGuide #CloudComputing #DataScience #AWSCertified #AWSSolutionsArchitect #AWSArchitectAssociate #AWSCertification #AWSStudyGuide #CloudComputing #AWSArchitecture #AWSTraining #AWSCareer #AWSExamPrep #AWSCommunity #AWSEducation #AzureFundamentals #AZ900 #MicrosoftAzure #ITCertification #CertificationPrep #StudyMaterials #TechLearning #MicrosoftCertified #AzureCertification #TechBooks

Top 1000 Canada Quiz and trivia: CANADA CITIZENSHIP TEST- HISTORY - GEOGRAPHY - GOVERNMENT- CULTURE - PEOPLE - LANGUAGES - TRAVEL - WILDLIFE - HOCKEY - TOURISM - SCENERIES - ARTS - DATA VISUALIZATION
zCanadian Quiz and Trivia, Canadian History, Citizenship Test, Geography, Wildlife, Secenries, Banff, Tourism

Top 1000 Africa Quiz and trivia: HISTORY - GEOGRAPHY - WILDLIFE - CULTURE - PEOPLE - LANGUAGES - TRAVEL - TOURISM - SCENERIES - ARTS - DATA VISUALIZATION
Africa Quiz, Africa Trivia, Quiz, African History, Geography, Wildlife, Culture

Exploring the Pros and Cons of Visiting All Provinces and Territories in Canada.
Exploring the Pros and Cons of Visiting All Provinces and Territories in Canada

Exploring the Advantages and Disadvantages of Visiting All 50 States in the USA
Exploring the Advantages and Disadvantages of Visiting All 50 States in the USA


Health Health, a science-based community to discuss health news and the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic

Today I Learned (TIL) You learn something new every day; what did you learn today? Submit interesting and specific facts about something that you just found out here.

Reddit Science This community is a place to share and discuss new scientific research. Read about the latest advances in astronomy, biology, medicine, physics, social science, and more. Find and submit new publications and popular science coverage of current research.

Reddit Sports Sports News and Highlights from the NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB, MLS, and leagues around the world.

Turn your dream into reality with Google Workspace: It’s free for the first 14 days.
Get 20% off Google Google Workspace (Google Meet) Standard Plan with  the following codes:
Get 20% off Google Google Workspace (Google Meet) Standard Plan with  the following codes: 96DRHDRA9J7GTN6 96DRHDRA9J7GTN6
63F733CLLY7R7MM
63F7D7CPD9XXUVT
63FLKQHWV3AEEE6
63JGLWWK36CP7WM
63KKR9EULQRR7VE
63KNY4N7VHCUA9R
63LDXXFYU6VXDG9
63MGNRCKXURAYWC
63NGNDVVXJP4N99
63P4G3ELRPADKQU
With Google Workspace, Get custom email @yourcompany, Work from anywhere; Easily scale up or down
Google gives you the tools you need to run your business like a pro. Set up custom email, share files securely online, video chat from any device, and more.
Google Workspace provides a platform, a common ground, for all our internal teams and operations to collaboratively support our primary business goal, which is to deliver quality information to our readers quickly.
Get 20% off Google Workspace (Google Meet) Business Plan (AMERICAS): M9HNXHX3WC9H7YE
C37HCAQRVR7JTFK
C3AE76E7WATCTL9
C3C3RGUF9VW6LXE
C3D9LD4L736CALC
C3EQXV674DQ6PXP
C3G9M3JEHXM3XC7
C3GGR3H4TRHUD7L
C3LVUVC3LHKUEQK
C3PVGM4CHHPMWLE
C3QHQ763LWGTW4C
Even if you’re small, you want people to see you as a professional business. If you’re still growing, you need the building blocks to get you where you want to be. I’ve learned so much about business through Google Workspace—I can’t imagine working without it.
(Email us for more codes)

error: Content is protected !!