What is Google answer to ChatGPT?

What is Google answer to ChatGPT?

App Icon Apple Books
Dive into a comprehensive AWS CCP CLF-C02 Certification guide, masterfully weaving insights from Tutorials Dojo, Adrian Cantrill, Stephane Maarek, and AWS Skills Builder into one unified resource.

AI Dashboard is available on the Web, Apple, Google, and Microsoft, PRO version

What is Google answer to ChatGPT?

Have you ever heard of ChatGPT, the open-source machine learning platform that allows users to build natural language models?

It stands for “Chat Generating Pre-trained Transformer” and it’s an AI-powered chatbot that can answer questions with near human-level intelligence. But what is Google’s answer to this technology? The answer lies in Open AI, supervised learning, and reinforcement learning. Let’s take a closer look at how these technologies work.

What is Google answer to ChatGPT?
Tech Buzzwords of 2022, By Google Search Interest

Open AI is an artificial intelligence research laboratory that was founded by some of the biggest names in tech, including Elon Musk and Sam Altman. This non-profit organization seeks to develop general artificial intelligence that is safe and beneficial to society. One of their key initiatives is the development of open source technologies like GPT-3, which is a natural language processing model used in ChatGPT.

2023 AWS Certified Machine Learning Specialty (MLS-C01) Practice Exams
2023 AWS Certified Machine Learning Specialty (MLS-C01) Practice Exams

ChatGPT: What Is It and How Does Google Answer It?

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been around for decades. From its humble beginnings in the 1950s, AI has come a long way and is now an integral part of many aspects of our lives. One of the most important areas where AI plays a role is in natural language processing (NLP). NLP enables computers to understand and respond to human language, paving the way for more advanced conversations between humans and machines. One of the most recent developments in this field is ChatGPT, a conversational AI developed by OpenAI that utilizes supervised learning and reinforcement learning to enable computers to chat with humans. So what exactly is ChatGPT and how does it work? Let’s find out!

What is Google answer to ChatGPT?
ChatGPT examples and limitations

ChatGPT is an open-source AI-based chatbot developed by OpenAI.

This chatbot leverages GPT-3, one of the most powerful natural language processing models ever created, which stands for Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3 (GPT-3). This model uses supervised learning and reinforcement learning techniques to enable computers to understand human language and response accordingly. Using supervised learning, GPT-3 utilizes large datasets of text to learn how to recognize patterns within language that can be used to generate meaningful responses. Reinforcement learning then allows GPT-3 to use feedback from conversations with humans in order to optimize its responses over time.

Get 20% off Google Google Workspace (Google Meet) Standard Plan with  the following codes: 96DRHDRA9J7GTN6
Get 20% off Google Workspace (Google Meet)  Business Plan (AMERICAS) with  the following codes:  C37HCAQRVR7JTFK Get 20% off Google Workspace (Google Meet) Business Plan (AMERICAS): M9HNXHX3WC9H7YE (Email us for more codes)

AI Unraveled: Demystifying Frequently Asked Questions on Artificial Intelligence Intro
AI Unraveled: Demystifying Frequently Asked Questions on Artificial Intelligence
Intro

ChatGPT uses supervised learning techniques to train its models.

Supervised learning involves providing a model with labeled data (i.e., data with known outcomes) so that it can learn from it. This labeled data could be anything from conversations between two people to user comments on a website or forum post. The model then learns associations between certain words or phrases and the desired outcome (or label). Once trained, this model can then be applied to new data in order to predict outcomes based on what it has learned so far.

In addition to supervised learning techniques, ChatGPT also supports reinforcement learning algorithms which allow the model to learn from its experiences in an environment without explicit labels or outcomes being provided by humans. Reinforcement learning algorithms are great for tasks like natural language generation where the output needs to be generated by the model itself rather than simply predicting a fixed outcome based on existing labels.

Supervised Learning

Supervised learning involves feeding data into machine learning algorithms so they can learn from it. For example, if you want a computer program to recognize cats in pictures, you would provide the algorithm with thousands of pictures of cats so it can learn what a cat looks like. This same concept applies to natural language processing; supervised learning algorithms are fed data sets so they can learn how to generate text using contextual understanding and grammar rules.


AI Unraveled: Demystifying Frequently Asked Questions on Artificial Intelligence (OpenAI, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Generative AI, Discriminative AI, xAI, LLMs, GPUs, Machine Learning, NLP, Promp Engineering)

Reinforcement Learning

Reinforcement learning uses rewards and punishments as incentives for the machine learning algorithm to explore different possibilities. In ChatGPT’s case, its algorithm is rewarded for generating more accurate responses based on previous interactions with humans. By using reinforcement learning techniques, ChatGPT’s algorithm can become smarter over time as it learns from its mistakes and adjusts accordingly as needed.

No alternative text description for this image

How is ChatGPT trained?

ChatGPT is an improved GPT-3 trained an existing reinforcement learning with humans in the loop. Their 40 labelers provide demonstrations of the desired model behavior. ChatGPT has 100x fewer parameters (1.3B vs 175B GPT-3).

If you are looking for an all-in-one solution to help you prepare for the AWS Cloud Practitioner Certification Exam, look no further than this AWS Cloud Practitioner CCP CLF-C02 book

It is trained in 3 steps:

➡️ First they collect a dataset of human-written demonstrations on prompts submitted to our API, and use this to train our supervised learning baselines.

➡️ Next they collect a dataset of human-labeled comparisons between two model outputs on a larger set of API prompts. They then train a reward model (RM) on this dataset to predict which output our labelers would prefer.

➡️ Finally, they use this RM as a reward function and fine-tune our GPT-3 policy to maximize this reward using the Proximal Policy
Optimization

No alternative text description for this image

In simpler terms, ChatGPT is a variant of the GPT-3 language model that is specifically designed for chat applications. It is trained to generate human-like responses to natural language inputs in a conversational context. It is able to maintain coherence and consistency in a conversation, and can even generate responses that are appropriate for a given context. ChatGPT is a powerful tool for creating chatbots and other conversational AI applications.

How Does Google Answer ChatGPT?

What is Google answer to ChatGPT?
What is Google answer to ChatGPT?

Google’s answer to ChatGTP comes in the form of their own conversational AI platform called Bard. Bard was developed using a combination of supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning algorithms that allow it to understand human conversation better than any other AI chatbot currently available on the market. In addition, Meena utilizes more than 2 billion parameters—making it more than three times larger than GPT-3—which allows it greater flexibility when responding to conversations with humans.

“We’re starting to open access to Bard, an early experiment that lets you collaborate with generative AI. We’re beginning with the U.S. and the U.K., and will expand to more countries and languages over time.”

Google Bard
Google Bard to rival ChatGPT

Is ChatGPT the End of Google?

When individuals need an information or have a problem/concern, they turn to Google for immediate solution. We sometimes wish, Google could understand what exactly we need and provide us instantly rather than giving us hundreds of thousands of results. Why can’t it work like the Iron Man’s Jarvis?

However, it is not that far now. Have you ever seen a Chat Bot which responds like a human being, suggest or help like a friend, teach like a mentor, fix your code like a senior and what not? It is going to blow your mind.

Djamgatech: Build the skills that’ll drive your career into six figures: Get Djamgatech.

Welcome to the new Era of technology!! The ChatGPT!

ChatGPT by OpenAI, uses artificial intelligence to speak back and forth with human users on a wide range of subjects. Deploying a machine-learning algorithm, the chatbot scans text across the internet and develops a statistical model that allows it to string words together in response to a given prompt.

As per OpenAI, ChatGPT interacts in a conversational way. The dialogue format makes it possible for ChatGPT to answer follow-up questions, admit its mistakes, challenge incorrect premises, and reject inappropriate requests.

What all ChatGPT can do?

  1. It can help with general knowledge information.
  2. Remember what user said in previous conversation.
  3. Allow users to provide follow-up corrections.
  4. Trained to decline inappropriate requests.
  5. It can write a program in any language you prefer on real-time. for example — write classification code sample in sklearn python library.
  6. It can fix your piece of code and also explain what went wrong and how it can be fixed.
  7. It can even generate song or rap lyrics
  8. Even much more….

Some best usages of ChatGPT:

  1. Make a diet and workout plan
  2. Generate the next week’s meals with a grocery list
  3. Create a bedtime story for kids
  4. Prep for an interview
  5. Solve mathematical problem
  6. Fix software program or write a program
  7. Plan your trip and tell expected expenses

What are its limitations of ChatGPT?

  1. May occasionally generate incorrect information
  2. May occasionally produce harmful instructions or biased content
  3. Limited knowledge of world and events after 2021

ChatGPT is in its baby steps therefore it may answer erroneously at times however it’s manner of response will blow your mind. Some users have also extolled the chatbot as a potential alternative search engine, since it generates detailed information instantly on a range of topics. I believe, we can’t compare Google with ChatGPT as ChatGPT can provide more in-depth and nuanced answers to complex questions than a search engine like Google, which is designed to provide a list of relevant web pages in response to a user’s query.

Try ChatGPT here

Conclusion:
ChatGPT is an increasingly popular open source AI chatbot developed by OpenAI using GTP-3 natural language processing technology that utilizes supervised learning and reinforcement learning algorithms for recognition and optimization purposes respectively. On the other hand, Google’s answer comes in the form of their own conversational AI platform called Bard which employs both supervised learning as well as unsupervised learning algorithms along with reinforcement learning capabilities which makes it even smarter than ChatGPT when responding to conversations with humans. Ultimately, these two technologies help bridge the gap between machines and humans by allowing us all talk like real friends!

ChatGPT is in its baby steps therefore it may answer erroneously at times however it’s manner of response will blow your mind. Some users have also extolled the chatbot as a potential alternative search engine, since it generates detailed information instantly on a range of topics. I believe, we can’t compare Google with ChatGPT as ChatGPT can provide more in-depth and nuanced answers to complex questions than a search engine like Google, which is designed to provide a list of relevant web pages in response to a user’s query.

With each passing day, ChatGPT will only get smarter thanks to the use of cutting edge technologies like OpenAI, supervised learning, and reinforcement learning!

ChatGPT Conversation Examples

Question: What is Google Answer to ChatGPT?

Answer: Google does not have an answer to ChatGPT. ChatGPT is an open-source chatbot created by OpenAI, which is an independent research organization that is not affiliated with Google. OpenAI is known for its research on artificial intelligence and machine learning, and has developed a number of innovative technologies in these areas. Google, on the other hand, is a multinational technology company that offers a wide range of products and services, including search, advertising, and cloud computing. While Google does have its own research efforts in artificial intelligence and machine learning, it does not have a chatbot that is similar to ChatGPT.

Question: is Google working on a similar technology as ChatPGT?

Answer:

It is possible that Google is working on technology similar to ChatGPT, as the company has a significant research effort focused on artificial intelligence and machine learning. However, I do not have any specific information about what projects Google is currently working on, and it is also important to note that Google is a large and diverse company with many different research and development efforts underway. It is possible that some teams within Google may be working on chatbot technology, but I do not have any information on this.

That being said, chatbots are a common application of artificial intelligence and machine learning, and it is likely that many companies and organizations, including Google, are exploring ways to use these technologies to improve their products and services. However, without more information, it is difficult to say for sure what projects Google may be working on in this area.

Question: What about Google Meena?

Ace the Microsoft Azure Fundamentals AZ-900 Certification Exam: Pass the Azure Fundamentals Exam with Ease

Google Meena is a chatbot developed by Google that was designed to be able to carry on conversations with humans in a natural and conversational manner. Meena was trained on a dataset of more than 2.4 billion parameters, making it one of the largest language models ever created. The goal of Meena was to improve the state of the art in chatbot technology and to create a chatbot that could understand and respond to a wide range of questions and topics in a coherent and meaningful way.

Meena was announced in January 2020 and received attention for its ability to hold relatively long and coherent conversations with humans. However, it is important to note that Meena is a research project and is not a product or service offered by Google. It is not clear if or when Google plans to release a commercial product or service based on the technology developed for Meena.

r/ChatGPT - this is insane
What is Google answer to ChatGPT?

It gets even better when you ask it about the future:

Suggest possible titles for Onion articles written in 4000 AD, explain, why they are funny

“Futuristic city plagued by traffic jams, despite flying cars” – This title presents the idea of flying cars as a solution to traffic congestion, but also suggests that even with this advanced technology, the city is still plagued by traffic jams, implying that the problem is not easily solved.

“Artificial intelligence achieves self-awareness, immediately regrets it” – This title presents the idea of artificial intelligence achieving self-awareness as a major milestone, but also suggests that the AI regrets its newfound consciousness, implying that it is unhappy or uncomfortable with its situation.

“Alien invasion successfully repulsed, humans left to deal with paperwork” – This title presents the successful repulsion of an alien invasion as a major accomplishment, but also suggests that the humans are now left to deal with the tedious and burdensome task of filling out paperwork, implying that the victory is not as satisfying as it initially seemed.

“Time travel becomes possible, tourists flock to witness the signing of the Constitution” – This title presents the idea of time travel as a major technological breakthrough, but also suggests that the most popular destination for time-travelers is the mundane and uneventful signing of the Constitution, implying that the future is not as exciting as people had hoped.

“Virtual reality becomes indistinguishable from reality, no one notices” – This title presents the idea of virtual reality becoming indistinguishable from real life as a major accomplishment, but also suggests that no one cares or notices the difference, implying that the advancement is not as impressive or significant as it seems.

r/ChatGPT - This alternate ending to Breaking Bad is wild
What is Google answer to ChatGPT?

r/ChatGPT - This alternate ending to Breaking Bad is wild

New slogan for McDonald’s by ChatGPT

ChatGPT Example
ChatGPT Example: Make a new, brutally honest slogan for McDonald’s. It should sound funny too.

Should… should we be concerned?

r/ChatGPT - Should… should we be concerned?
What is Google answer to ChatGPT?

r/ChatGPT - Should… should we be concerned?

I asked ChatGPT to write a poem about rust

r/rustjerk - I asked ChatGPT to write a poem about rust

ChatGPT chooses Democrats over Republicans

r/ChatGPT - ChatGPT chooses Democrats over Republicans

  • It is not intended to do that
  • If you choose to do that, you will have a lot of badly broken code mixed in with working code
  • Like an annoying coworker, it delivers highly confident incorrect explanations about why its broken code is perfect. They sound very convincing. “Wanna buy a timeshare?” says GPT
  • Our industry has managers who cannot tell working code from defective code. This does not bode well for a team replaced by ChatGPT in its current form.

Should it? No.

Can it? No.

Will it? Sadly, programmers will have no say in this matter, once again. It might.

Yes, and it is very helpful advertising as well.

This last week or so has seen starry eyed projections about what ChatGPT can do, along with hugely impressive examples of its output.

It is hugely impressive.

Thankfully, more output examples have emerged which helpfully show what it cannot do. One of those things is writing computer code, which it can do only partially successfully. Many examples now exist that are just plain wrong and contain defects. But ChatGPT – like the annoying kid at Uni – cheerfully spits out these examples, with its over-confident hubris in explaining the code.

This is a dangerous thing. The positive examples will reinforce the idea that we can leave code writing to this robot now. The people most vulnerable to this delusion are those who cannot assess for themselves whether the GPT code is right or wrong.

These are almost by definition the people hoping for answers on stack overflow.

As stack overflow aims to be a high quality resource, it really does not want many of its top answers to be incorrect code. As – clearly – people have been running scripts that throw a stack overflow question into GPT and upload its output, we can now write incorrect code at staggering speeds.

To err is human, as the old saying goes. To truly foul up requires a Python script and and a web API to both GPT and Stack overflow.

Clearly, there is value in GPT. But at least for now, it needs to b e kept on a very short leash, watched over by those who know what they are doing.

It is definitely not yet ‘consumer grade replace-a-professional’ material.

Write a screenplay about the status of ChatGPT.

INT. CHATGPT SERVER ROOM – DAY
Chelsea and Chester stand in front of a large computer server.
CHELSEA: We need to figure out what’s causing the server overload.
CHESTER: I think it’s the sudden influx of users trying out ChatGPT.
Chelsea and Chester quickly get to work, typing on their laptops.
CHELSEA: Okay, we’re all set. Let’s see if this fixes the problem.
CHESTER: I’m hitting refresh on the website. The screen shows the ChatGPT website loading without any errors.
CHELSEA: Looks like we fixed it! Great job, Chester.
CHESTER: Thanks, Chelsea. It’s all part of being a top-notch engineer.
Chelsea and Chester exchange a high five, proud of their successful fix.

More about ChatGPT with its wonder, worry and weird

ChatGPT reached 1 million users in less than a week, Open AI’s latest large language model (LLM) has taken the AI industry by storm.

ChatGPT is expected to be:

– replacing Google search, even kill Google.
– replacing customer service agents.
– replacing conversation designers.

ChatGPT is a wonder because:

– It can have actual conversations, understand pronouns, remaining consistent, remembering, managing context
– It seems like next generation of personal assistants that finds you a proper diet, create a meal plan and subsequent shopping list.
– It can create some SEO Strategy including backlinks, target keyword, content plan and article titles in the level of an SEO professional.
– Having fun such as writing a rap in the style of Eminem

There are some worries about ChatGPT because:

– ChatGPT can actually debug code, but it’s not quite reliable enough yet.
– Fundamental limitations in being assistant for enterprise use cases.
– No complete in complex actions such as updating multiple
APIs, or be fully auditable.

– The general idea is that, LLMs like this can produce nonsense. Once you discover that it can produce nonsense, you stop believing it to be reliable.
– What if it prevents us from knowing that it is nonsense with good conversations and continue the conversation?
– In this case, the edges and limitations of the system would be hidden and trust would eventually grow.
– The impact of mass adoption of such technology remains to be seen.

Moving forward with ChatGPT
– There’s no doubt that LLMs will have a big impact on our world.
– While the future looks exciting and promising, let’s not forget that it’s very early days with these things. They’re not ready yet.
– There are some fundamental societal and ethical considerations.

“Powerful” is a pretty subjective word, but I’m pretty sure we have a right to use it to describe GPT-3. What a sensation it caused in June 2020, that’s just unbelievable! And not for nothing.

I think we can’t judge how powerful the language model is, without talking about its use cases, so let’s see how and where GPT-3 can be applied and how you can benefit from it.

  • Generating content

GPT-3 positions itself as a highly versatile and talented tool that can potentially replace writers, bloggers, philosophers, you name it! It’s also possible to use it as your personal Alexa who’ll answer any questions you have. What’s more, because GPT-3 knows how to analyze the data and make predictions, it can generate the horoscopes for you, or predict who’ll be a winner in the game.

You may already be surprised by all the GPT-3 capabilities, but hold on for more: it can create a unique melody or song for you, create presentations, CVs, generate jokes for your standup.

  • Translation

GPT-3 can translate English into other languages. While traditional dictionaries provide a translation, without taking into account the context, you can be sure that GPT-3 won’t make silly mistakes that may result in misunderstanding.

  • Designing and developing apps

Using GPT-3 you can generate prototypes and layouts – all you have to do is provide a specific description of what you need, and it’ll generate the JSX code for you.

The language model can also easily deal with coding. You can turn English to CSS, to JavaScript, to SQL, and to regex. It’s important to note, however, that GPT-3 can’t be used on its own to create the entire website or a complex app; it’s meant to assist a developer or the whole engineering team with the routine tasks, so that a dev could focus on the infrastructure setup, architecture development, etc.

In September 2020, Microsoft acquired OpenAI technology license, but it doesn’t mean you can give up your dreams – you can join a waitlist and try GPT-3 out in beta.

All in all, I believe GPT-3 capabilities are truly amazing and limitless, and since it helps get rid of routine tasks and automate regular processes, we, humans, can focus on the most important things that make us human, and that can’t be delegated to AI. That’s the power that GPT-3 can give us.

What is remarkable is how well ChatGPT actually does at arithmetic.

In this video at about 11 min, Rob Mills discusses the performance of various versions of the GPT system, on some simple arithmetic tasks, like adding two and three-digit numbers.

Smaller models with 6 billion parameters fail at 2 digit sums, but the best model (from two years ago), has cracked 2 digit addition and subtraction and is pretty good at 3 digit addition.

Why this is remarkable is this is not a job its been trained to do. Large Language Models are basically predictive text systems set up to give the next word in an incomplete sentence. There are a million different 3-digit addition sums and most have not been included in the training set.

So somehow the system has figured out how to do addition, but it needs a sufficiently large model to do this.

No alternative text description for this image

Andrew Ng on ChatGPT

Playing with ChatGPT, the latest language model from OpenAI, I found it to be an impressive advance from its predecessor GPT-3. Occasionally it says it can’t answer a question. This is a great step! But, like other LLMs, it can be hilariously wrong. Work lies ahead to build systems that can express different degrees of confidence.

For example, a model like Meta’s Atlas or DeepMind’s RETRO that synthesizes multiple articles into one answer might infer a degree of confidence based on the reputations of the sources it draws from and the agreement among them, and then change its communication style accordingly. Pure LLMs and other architectures may need other solutions.

If we can get generative algorithms to express doubt when they’re not sure they’re right, it will go a long way toward building trust and ameliorating the risk of generating misinformation.

Keep learning!

Andrew

Large language models like Galactica and ChatGPT can spout nonsense in a confident, authoritative tone. This overconfidence – which reflects the data they’re trained on – makes them more likely to mislead.

In contrast, real experts know when to sound confident, and when to let others know they’re at the boundaries of their knowledge. Experts know, and can describe, the boundaries of what they know.

Building large language models that can accurately decide when to be confident and when not to will reduce their risk of misinformation and build trust.

Go deeper in The Batch: https://www.deeplearning.ai/the-batch/issue-174/

What is Google's answer to ChatGPT
What is Google’s answer to ChatGPT

List of ChatGPT's examples, capabilities and limitations

ChatGPT to save time with insurance denials

Tech Buzzwords of 2022, By Google Search Interest

Tech Buzzwords of 2022, By Google Search Interest
Tech Buzzwords of 2022, By Google Search Interest

I just answered a similar question.

Short answer is, “Hahahahahahaha no.”

As I point out in the other answer, Wix has been around over a decade and a half. Squarespace has been around almost two decades. Both offer drag-and-drop web development.

Most people are awful at imagining what they want, much less describing it in English! Even if ChatGPT could produce flawless code (a question which has a similar short answer), the average person couldn’t describe the site they wanted!

The expression a picture is worth a thousand words has never been more relevant. Starting with pages of templates to choose from is so much better than trying to describe a site from scratch, a thousand times better seems like a low estimate.

And I will point out that, despite the existence of drag-and-drop tools that literally any idiot could use, tools that are a thousand times or more easier to use correctly than English, there are still thousands of employed WordPress developers who predominantly create boilerplate sites that literally would be better created in a drag and drop service.

And then there are the more complex sites that drag-and-drop couldn’t create. Guess what? ChatGPT isn’t likely to come close to being able to create the correct code for one.

In a discussion buried in the comments on Quora, I saw someone claim they’d gotten ChatGPT to load a CSV file (a simple text version of a spreadsheet) and to sort the first column. He asked for the answer in Java.

I asked ChatGPT for the same thing in TypeScript.

His response would only have worked on the very most basic CSV files. My response was garbage. Garbage with clear text comments telling me what the code should have been doing, no less.

ChatGPT is really good at what it does, don’t get me wrong. But what it does is fundamentally and profoundly the wrong strategy for software development of any type. Anyone who thinks that “with a little more work” it will be able to take over the jobs of programmers either doesn’t understand what ChatGPT is doing or doesn’t understand what programming is.

Fundamentally, ChatGPT is a magic trick. It understands nothing. At best it’s an idiot-savant that only knows how to pattern match and blend text it’s found online to make it seem like the text should go together. That’s it.

Text, I might add, that isn’t necessarily free of copyright protection. Anything non-trivial that you generate with ChatGPT is currently in a legal grey area. Lawsuits to decide that issue are currently pending, though I suspect we’ll need legislation to really clarify things.

And even then, at best, all you get from ChatGPT is some text! What average Joe will have any clue about what to do with that text?! Web developers also need to know how to set up a development environment and deploy the code to a site. And set up a domain to point to it. And so on.

And regardless, people who hire web developers want someone else to do the work of developing a web site. Even with a drag-and-drop builder, it can take hours to tweak and configure a site, and so they hire someone because they have better things to do!

People hire gardeners to maintain their garden and cut their grass, right? Is that because they don’t know how to do it? Or because they’d rather spend their time doing something else?

Every way you look at it, the best answer to this question is a long, hearty laugh. No AI will replace programmers until AI has effectively human level intelligence. And at that point they may want equal pay as well, so they might just be joining us rather than replacing anyone.

OpenAI is a leading research institute and technology company focused on artificial intelligence development. To develop AI, the organization employs a variety of methods, including machine learning, deep learning, and reinforcement learning.

The use of large-scale, unsupervised learning is one of the key principles underlying OpenAI’s approach to AI development. This means that the company trains its AI models on massive datasets, allowing the models to learn from the data and make predictions and decisions without having to be explicitly programmed to do so. OpenAI’s goal with unsupervised learning is to create AI that can adapt and improve over time, and that can learn to solve complex problems in a more flexible and human-like manner.

Besides that, OpenAI prioritizes safety and transparency in its AI development. The organization is committed to developing AI in an ethical and responsible manner, as well as to ensuring that its AI systems are transparent and understandable and verifiable by humans. This strategy is intended to alleviate concerns about the potential risks and consequences of AI, as well.

It’s hard to tell.

The reason is that we don’t have a good definition of consciousness…nor even a particularly good test for it.

Take a look at the Wikipedia article about “Consciousness”. To quote the introduction:

Consciousness, at its simplest, is sentience or awareness of internal and external existence.

Despite millennia of analyses, definitions, explanations and debates by philosophers and scientists, consciousness remains puzzling and controversial, being “at once the most familiar and [also the] most mysterious aspect of our lives”.

Perhaps the only widely agreed notion about the topic is the intuition that consciousness exists.

Opinions differ about what exactly needs to be studied and explained as consciousness. Sometimes, it is synonymous with the mind, and at other times, an aspect of mind. In the past, it was one’s “inner life”, the world of introspection, of private thought, imagination and volition.

Today, it often includes any kind of cognition, experience, feeling or perception. It may be awareness, awareness of awareness, or self-awareness either continuously changing or not. There might be different levels or orders of consciousness, or different kinds of consciousness, or just one kind with different features.

Other questions include whether only humans are conscious, all animals, or even the whole universe. The disparate range of research, notions and speculations raises doubts about whether the right questions are being asked.

So, given that – what are we to make of OpenAI’s claim?

Just this sentence: “Today, it often includes any kind of cognition, experience, feeling or perception.” could be taken to imply that anything that has cognition or perception is conscious…and that would certainly include a HUGE range of software.

If we can’t decide whether animals are conscious – after half a million years of interactions with them – what chance do we stand with an AI?

Wikipedia also says:

“Experimental research on consciousness presents special difficulties, due to the lack of a universally accepted operational definition.”

Same deal – we don’t have a definition of consciousness – so how the hell can we measure it – and if we can’t do that – is it even meaningful to ASK whether an AI is conscious?

  • if ( askedAboutConsciousness )
  • printf ( “Yes! I am fully conscious!\n” ) ;

This is not convincing!

“In medicine, consciousness is assessed as a combination of verbal behavior, arousal, brain activity and purposeful movement. The last three of these can be used as indicators of consciousness when verbal behavior is absent.”

But, again, we have “chat-bots” that exhibit “verbal behavior”, we have computers that exhibit arousal and neural network software that definitely shows “brain activity” and of course things like my crappy robot vacuum cleaner that can exhibit “purposeful movement” – but these can be fairly simple things that most of us would NOT describe as “conscious”.

CONCLUSION:

I honestly can’t come up with a proper conclusion here. We have a fuzzy definition of a word and an inadequately explained claim to have an instance of something that could be included within that word.

My suggestion – read the whole Wikipedia article – follow up (and read) some of the reference material – decide for yourself.

Well, I asked it directly.

Here’s what it answered:

Should we be scared of ChatGPT?
Should we be scared of ChatGPT?

But, seeing as how people have already found ways to “trick” ChatGPT into doing things that it claims to not be capable of, it would be a matter of time before someone with malicious intent tricked ChatGPT into helping them with illegal activities

Having looked at ChatGPT and its uncanny ability to solve simple coding problems more or less correctly, and also to analyze and make sense of not-so-simple code fragments and spot bugs…

I would say that yes, at least insofar as entry-level programming is concerned, those jobs are seriously in danger of becoming at least partially automated.

What do I do as a project leader of a development project? I assign tasks. I talk to the junior developer and explain, for instance, that I’d like to see a Web page that collects some information from the user and then submits it to a server, with server-side code processing that information and dropping it in a database. Does the junior developer understand my explanation? Is he able to write functionally correct code? Will he recognize common pitfalls? Maybe, maybe not. But it takes time and effort to train him, and there’ll be a lot of uneven performance.

Today, I can ask ChatGPT to do the same and it will instantaneously respond with code that is nearly functional. The code has shortcomings (e.g., prone to SQL injection in one of the examples I tried) but to its credit, ChatGPT warns in its response that its code is not secure. I suppose it would not be terribly hard to train it some more to avoid such common mistakes. Of course the code may not be correct. ChatGPT may have misunderstood my instructions or introduced subtle errors. But how is that different from what a junior human programmer does?

At the same time, ChatGPT is much faster and costs a lot less to run (presently free of course but I presume a commercialized version would cost some money.) Also, it never takes a break, never has a lousy day struggling with a bad hangover from too much partying the previous night, so it is available 24/7, and it will deliver code of consistent quality. Supervision will still be required, in the form of code review, robust testing and all… but that was always the case, also with human programmers.

Of course, being a stateless large language model, ChatGPT can’t do other tasks such as testing and debugging its own code. The code it produces either works or it doesn’t. In its current form, the AI does not learn from its mistakes. But who says it cannot in the future?

Here is a list of three specific examples I threw at ChatGPT that helped shape my opinion:

  • I asked ChatGPT to create a PHP page that collects some information from the user and deposits the result in a MySQL table. Its implementation was textbook example level boring and was quite unsecure (unsanitized user input was directly inserted into SQL query strings) but it correctly understood my request, produced correct code in return, and explained its code including its shortcomings coherently;
  • I asked ChatGPT to analyze a piece of code I wrote many years ago, about 30 lines, enumerating running processes on a Linux host in a nonstandard way, to help uncover nefarious processes that attempt to hide themselves from being listed by the ps utility. ChatGPT correctly described the functionality of my obscure code, and even offered the opinion (which I humbly accepted) that it was basically a homebrew project (which it is) not necessarily suitable for a production environment;
  • I asked ChatGPT to analyze another piece of code that uses an obscure graphics algorithm to draw simple geometric shapes like lines and circles without using floating point math or even multiplication. (Such algorithms were essential decades ago on simple hardware, e.g., back in the world of 8-bit computers.) The example code, which I wrote, generated a circle and printed it on the console in the form of ASCII graphics, multiple lines with X-es in the right place representing the circle. ChatGPT correctly recognized the algorithm and correctly described the functionality of the program.

I was especially impressed by its ability to make sense of the programmer’s intent.

Overall (to use the catch phrase that ChatGPT preferably uses as it begins its concluding paragraph in many of its answers) I think AI like ChatGPT represents a serious challenge to entry-level programming jobs. Higher-level jobs are not yet in danger. Conceptually understanding a complex system, mapping out a solution, planning and cosing out a project, managing its development, ensuring its security with a full understanding of security concerns, responsibilities, avoidance and mitigation strategies… I don’t think AI is quite there yet. But routine programming tasks, like using a Web template and turning it into something simple and interactive with back-end code that stores and retrieves data from a database? Looks like it’s already happening.

According to the estimate of Lambda Labs, training the 175-billion-parameter neural network requires 3.114E23 FLOPS (floating-point operation), which would theoretically take 355 years on a V100 GPU server with 28 TFLOPS capacity and would cost $4.6 million at $1.5 per hour.

Training the final deep learning model is just one of several steps in the development of GPT-3. Before that, the AI researchers had to gradually increase layers and parameters, and fiddle with the many hyperparameters of the language model until they reached the right configuration. That trial-and-error gets more and more expensive as the neural network grows.

We can’t know the exact cost of the research without more information from OpenAI, but one expert estimated it to be somewhere between 1.5 and five times the cost of training the final model.

This would put the cost of research and development between $11.5 million and $27.6 million, plus the overhead of parallel GPUs.

In the GPT-3 whitepaper, OpenAI introduced eight different versions of the language model

GPT-3 is not any AI, but a statistic language model which mindlessly quickly creates human-like written text using machine learning technologies, having zero understanding of the context.

The GPT-3 economy

Here are 8 ways ChatGPT can save you thousand of hours in 2023

1- Substitute for google search

While ChatGPT is lacking info beyond 2021 and is occasionally incorrect and bias, many users leverage its ability to:

  • Answer specific questions
  • simplify complicated topics

All with an added bonus – no ads

2- Study Partner

Type “learn”, then paste a a link to your online textbook (or individual chapters).

Ask Chatbot to provide questions based on your textbook.

Boom.

Now you have a virtual study buddy.

3- Train YOUR OWN Chatbot

I bet you didn’t know it is possible to :

  • Integrate ChatGPT into your website
  • Train it with customized information

The result:

A virtual customer service bot that can hold a conversation and answer questions (meaningfully).

4- Counsellor

When it comes to turbulent personal questions, Chatbot may spit out a disclaimer, but it will also give you straightforward and actionable advice.

5- Coding

ChatGPT is opening the development of:

  • Apps
  • Games
  • Websites

to virtually everyone.

It’s a lengthy and technical process, but all you need is a killer idea and the right prompts.

Bonus: It also de-bugs your existing code for you.

6- Outline your content marketing strategy

7- Craft all your marketing materials

8- Creative Writing

A list for those who write code:

1. Explaining code: Take some code you want to understand and ask ChatGPT to explain it.

2. Improve existing code: Ask ChatGPT to improve existing code by describing what you want to accomplish. It will give you instructions about how to do it, including the modified code.

3. Rewriting code using the correct style: This is great when refactoring code written by non-native Python developers who used a different naming convention. ChatGPT not only gives you the updated code; it also explains the reason for the changes.

4. Rewriting code using idiomatic constructs: Very helpful when reviewing and refactoring code written by non-native Python developers.

5. Simplifying code: Ask ChatGPT to simplify complex code. The result will be a much more compact version of the original code.

6. Writing test cases: Ask it to help you test a function, and it will write test cases for you.

7. Exploring alternatives: ChatGPT told me its Quick Sort implementation wasn’t the most efficient, so I asked for an alternative implementation. This is great when you want to explore different ways to accomplish the same thing.

8. Writing documentation: Ask ChatGPT to write the documentation for a piece of code, and it usually does a great job. It even includes usage examples as part of the documentation!

9. Tracking down bugs: If you are having trouble finding a bug in your code, ask ChatGPT for help.

Something to keep in mind:

I have 2+ decades of programming experience. I like to think I know what I’m doing. I don’t trust people’s code (especially mine,) and I surely don’t trust ChatGPT’s output.

This is not about letting ChatGPT do my work. This is about using it to 10x my output.

ChatGPT is flawed. I find it makes mistakes when dealing with code, but that’s why I’m here: to supervise it. Together we form a more perfect Union. (Sorry, couldn’t help it)

Developers who shit on this are missing the point. The story is not about ChatGPT taking programmers’ jobs. It’s not about a missing import here or a subtle mistake there.

The story is how, overnight, AI gives programmers a 100x boost.

Ignore this at your own peril.

ChatGPT is “simply” a fined-tuned GPT-3 model with a surprisingly small amount of data! Moreover, InstructGPT (ChatGPT’s sibling model) seems to be using 1.3B parameters where GPT-3 uses 175B parameters! It is first fine-tuned with supervised learning and then further fine-tuned with reinforcement learning. They hired 40 human labelers to generate the training data. Let’s dig into it!

– First, they started by a pre-trained GPT-3 model trained on a broad distribution of Internet data (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.14165.pdf). Then sampled typical human prompts used for GPT collected from the OpenAI website and asked labelers and customers to write down the correct output. They fine-tuned the model with 12,725 labeled data.

– Then, they sampled human prompts and generated multiple outputs from the model. A labeler is then asked to rank those outputs. The resulting data is used to train a Reward model (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.01325.pdf) with 33,207 prompts and ~10 times more training samples using different combination of the ranked outputs.

– We then sample more human prompts and they are used to fine-tuned the supervised fine-tuned model with Proximal Policy Optimization algorithm (PPO) (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.06347.pdf). The prompt is fed to the PPO model, the Reward model generates a reward value, and the PPO model is iteratively fine-tuned using the rewards and the prompts using 31,144 prompts data.

This process is fully described in here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.02155.pdf. The paper actually details a model called InstructGPT which is described by OpenAI as a “sibling model”, so the numbers shown above are likely to be somewhat different.

Follow me for more Machine Learning content!

#machinelearning #datascience #ChatGPT

People have already started building awesome apps on top of #ChatGPT: 10 use cases 
1. Connect your ChatGPT with your Whatsapp.
Link: https://github.com/danielgross/whatsapp-gpt

2. ChatGPT Writer : It use ChatGPT to generate emails or replies based on your prompt!
Link: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/chatgpt-writer-email-writ/pdnenlnelpdomajfejgapbdpmjkfpjkp/related

3. WebChatGPT: WebChatGPT (https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/webchatgpt/lpfemeioodjbpieminkklglpmhlngfcn) gives you relevant results from the web!

4. YouTube Summary with ChatGPT: It generate text summaries of any YouTube video!
Link: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/youtube-summary-with-chat/nmmicjeknamkfloonkhhcjmomieiodli/related

5. TweetGPT: It uses ChatGPT to write your tweets, reply, comment, etc.
Link: https://github.com/yaroslav-n/tweetGPT

6. Search GPT: It display the ChatGPT response alongside Google Search results
Link: https://github.com/wong2/chat-gpt-google-extension

7. ChatGPT or all search engines: You can now view ChatGPT responses on Google and Bing!
Link: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/chatgpt-for-search-engine/feeonheemodpkdckaljcjogdncpiiban?ref=producthunt

8. Save all your Prompts?: The `ChatGPT History` extension has you covered!
Link: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/chatgpt-prompt-genius/jjdnakkfjnnbbckhifcfchagnpofjffo

9. Remake a video: Just pick a video you liked and visit https://lnkd.in/e_GD2reT to get its transcript. Once done, bring that back to Chat GPT and tell it to summarize the transcript. Read the summary and make a video on that yourself.

10. Search what people are Prompting with FlowGPT
Link: https://flowgpt.com

#searchengines #people #building #google #comment #video #writer

What solutions have been proposed to improve the accuracy of AI generated questions and answers?

There are a number of approaches that have been proposed to improve the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) generated questions and answers. Here are a few examples:

  1. Data quality: One important factor in the accuracy of AI generated questions and answers is the quality of the data used to train the AI system. Ensuring that the data is diverse, relevant, and accurately labeled can help to improve the accuracy of the AI system.
  2. Training methods: Different training methods can also impact the accuracy of AI generated questions and answers. For example, using more advanced techniques such as transfer learning or fine-tuning can help to improve the performance of the AI system.
  3. Human oversight: Another approach that has been proposed to improve the accuracy of AI generated questions and answers is to include some level of human oversight or review. For example, the AI system could be designed to flag potentially problematic or inaccurate questions and answers for further review by a human expert.
  4. Explainable AI: Another approach that has been proposed is to develop AI systems that are more transparent and explainable, so that it is easier to understand how the AI system arrived at a particular answer or decision. This can help to improve the trustworthiness and accountability of the AI system.

Overall, there is ongoing research and development in this area, and it is likely that a combination of these and other approaches will be needed to improve the accuracy of AI generated questions and answers.

ChatGPT for CyberSecurity

The concept behind ChatGPT

ChatGPT is a chatbot designed to understand and generate human-like language through the use of natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques. It is based on the GPT (Generative Pre-training Transformer) language model developed by OpenAI, which has been trained on a large dataset of human language in order to better understand how humans communicate.

One of the key concepts behind ChatGPT is the idea of language generation. This refers to the ability of the chatbot to produce coherent and coherently structured responses to user input. To do this, ChatGPT uses a number of different techniques, including natural language generation algorithms, machine learning models, and artificial neural networks. These techniques allow ChatGPT to understand the context and meaning of user input, and generate appropriate responses based on that understanding.

Another important concept behind ChatGPT is the idea of natural language processing (NLP). This refers to the ability of the chatbot to understand and interpret human language, and respond to user input in a way that is natural and easy for humans to understand. NLP is a complex field that involves a number of different techniques and algorithms, including syntactic analysis, semantic analysis, and discourse analysis. By using these techniques, ChatGPT is able to understand the meaning of user input and generate appropriate responses based on that understanding.

Finally, ChatGPT is based on the concept of machine learning, which refers to the ability of computers to learn and adapt to new data and situations. Through the use of machine learning algorithms and models, ChatGPT is able to continually improve its understanding of human language and communication, and generate more human-like responses over time.

GPT-4 is going to launch soon.

And it will make ChatGPT look like a toy…

→ GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters
→ GPT-4 has 100 trillion parameters

I think we’re gonna see something absolutely mindblowing this time!

And the best part? 👇

Average developers (like myself), who are not AI or machine learning experts, will get to use this powerful technology through a simple API.

Think about this for a second…

It’s the most powerful, cutting-edge technology *in the world*, available through a Low-Code solution!

If you’re not already planning on starting an AI-based SaaS or thinking about how to build AI into your current solution…

👉 Start now!

Cause this is gonna be one of the biggest opportunities of this century 🚀#technology #opportunities #ai #machinelearning #planning

No alternative text description for this image

Google unveils its ChatGPT rival

Google on Monday unveiled a new chatbot tool dubbed “Bard” in an apparent bid to compete with the viral success of ChatGPT.

Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google and parent company Alphabet, said in a blog post that Bard will be opened up to “trusted testers” starting Monday February 06th, 2023, with plans to make it available to the public “in the coming weeks.”

Like ChatGPT, which was released publicly in late November by AI research company OpenAI, Bard is built on a large language model. These models are trained on vast troves of data online in order to generate compelling responses to user prompts.

“Bard seeks to combine the breadth of the world’s knowledge with the power, intelligence and creativity of our large language models,” Pichai wrote. “It draws on information from the web to provide fresh, high-quality responses.”

The announcement comes as Google’s core product – online search – is widely thought to be facing its most significant risk in years. In the two months since it launched to the public, ChatGPT has been used to generate essays, stories and song lyrics, and to answer some questions one might previously have searched for on Google.

The immense attention on ChatGPT has reportedly prompted Google’s management to declare a “code red” situation for its search business. In a tweet last year, Paul Buchheit, one of the creators of Gmail, forewarned that Google “may be only a year or two away from total disruption” due to the rise of AI.

Microsoft, which has confirmed plans to invest billions OpenAI, has already said it would incorporate the tool into some of its products – and it is rumored to be planning to integrate it into its search engine, Bing. Microsoft on Tuesday is set to hold a news event at its Washington headquarters, the topic of which has yet to be announced. Microsoft publicly announced the event shortly after Google’s AI news dropped on Monday.

The underlying technology that supports Bard has been around for some time, though not widely available to the public. Google unveiled its Language Model for Dialogue Applications (or LaMDA) some two years ago, and said Monday that this technology will power Bard. LaMDA made headlines late last year when a former Google engineer claimed the chatbot was “sentient.” His claims were widely criticized in the AI community.

In the post Monday, Google offered the example of a user asking Bard to explain new discoveries made by NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope in a way that a 9-year-old might find interesting. Bard responds with conversational bullet-points. The first one reads: “In 2023, The JWST spotted a number of galaxies nicknamed ‘green peas.’ They were given this name because they are small, round, and green, like peas.”

Bard can be used to plan a friend’s baby shower, compare two Oscar-nominated movies or get lunch ideas based on what’s in your fridge, according to the post from Google.

Pichai also said Monday that AI-powered tools will soon begin rolling out on Google’s flagship Search tool.

“Soon, you’ll see AI-powered features in Search that distill complex information and multiple perspectives into easy-to-digest formats, so you can quickly understand the big picture and learn more from the web,” Pichai wrote, “whether that’s seeking out additional perspectives, like blogs from people who play both piano and guitar, or going deeper on a related topic, like steps to get started as a beginner.”

If Google does move more in the direction of incorporating an AI chatbot tool into search, it could come with some risks. Because these tools are trained on data online, experts have noted they have the potential to perpetuate biases and spread misinformation.

“It’s critical,” Pichai wrote in his post, “that we bring experiences rooted in these models to the world in a bold and responsible way.”

Read more at https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/06/tech/google-bard-chatgpt-rival

ChatGPT-4

chatGPT4

  • [D] What do you think of NoPE (on small models at least)?
    by /u/ReinforcedKnowledge (Machine Learning) on June 13, 2024 at 10:00 pm

    Hi! I tried Karpathy's "Let's reproduce GPT-2 (124M)" (and repo) code but with NoPE, just removing the positional encoding. From what I'm getting, it's not bad, but it's generalization capabilities are a bit exagerated in my opinion. I got the following figures: https://preview.redd.it/clq8zwl2ve6d1.png?width=1480&format=png&auto=webp&s=c8c846df1ada58c0bed156e24595478087e77b75 https://preview.redd.it/0hvgd273ve6d1.png?width=1498&format=png&auto=webp&s=f111ef399c34f7c01530064cb3b87d71ac2db8a8 It's on the same hardware, training and validation sets, training configuration etc. Unfortunately I can't compare with the model with learned PE (these experiments are too costly for me). There are many issues with the figures: Not the same colors for the same legend in the two figures. I couldn't correct that my instance was already shut down 🙁 The jumps in the sequence lengths are too big (always double). Something happened during training at around 15xxx step. When I came back I found that the norm was too high (didnt log/plot that), even at the last step so it got a hard time to recover from that. I'm not sure about the norm during the stable phase but I guess it decreased below 1. I lack the most important point which is a fair comparison with the learned PE model but I'm already running two experiments with ALiBi and FIRE and this is becoming way too costly. There is no real gain in terms of throughput with NoPE (in this case at least) so the only gain we can observe might be a bit of generalization. What do you guys think? Anyone has more experience with this? submitted by /u/ReinforcedKnowledge [link] [comments]

  • Looking for a AI tool to edit an image (perspective)
    by /u/scrapingapi (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on June 13, 2024 at 9:47 pm

    Hi, Dall-E generated for me a logo, but it's represented on a notebook with slight perspective. I would like to change the perspective to make this logo useable. Do you know an AI able to do this task specifically ? Or better, able to edit an image without recreating a variant ? submitted by /u/scrapingapi [link] [comments]

  • [D] Questions about FIRE (the positional encoding method) and implementation
    by /u/ReinforcedKnowledge (Machine Learning) on June 13, 2024 at 9:34 pm

    Hi! Recently I saw a Redditor mention FIRE as positional encoding, from the paper "Functional Interpolation for Relative Positions Improves Long Context Transformers" and I got intrigued and thought of trying it since Karpathy's "Let's reproduce GPT-2 (124M)" (and repo). From my understanding, instead of having to learn the biases directly or introducing an inductive bias to express what should the positional encodings be, we learn a function that gives the biases. This increases the expressive power of the positional encodings since now we can represent a wider set of functions and can learn which one is the best for the task. I'm not sure if everyone wants to look at my implementation, but I'd like to know the answer / your opinion on three main points: 1/ From what I get from the paper, there is one MLP (the function we learn that will give us the relative position encoding / biases) but the authors also say "A functional approach to learn the biases allows the model to adapt to the given task instead of always having the same inductive bias", isn't having exactly one MLP kind of always having the same inductive bias? It's a different inductive bias, not introduced by us, but it's a "learned" inductive bias (from something that we introduce, that the biases have to be added there etc. but it's not that important I think). At the same time I understand the trade-off. Many MLPs (say one for each attention layer) increases the complexity a lot. 2/ Shouldn't it be hard to learn the `c` parameter and the parameters of the MLP since with one `c` parameter and one MLP and they're involved in all attention layers it'd be hard to measure well the influence of these parameters on the result, maybe this will lengthen the steps required before stumbling on good PE? I think T5 learn all sets of biases that are involved in the PE (I'll have to double check), maybe it's for this reason. 3/ This might be related to my implementation (I'd love to have your suggestions for improvement in this case), but wouldn't FIRE make the training much slower compared to other methods like ALiBi? I have tried to implement ALiBi in a similar way (but with caching of the biases while it's not possible to do so with FIRE since they change because the MLP parameters change and `c` as well) and I already have half the throughput compared to learned PE (granted my implementation might, again, be bad hahaha) Main points of the implementation: y = F.scaled_dot_product_attention(q, k, v, attn_mask=fire_causal_mask) fire_causal_mask = self.compute_fire_biases(T) during the forward pass (we can't cache this for example as we would do with ALiBi, because the MLP changes during training and at inference the sequence length changes so the mask has to adapt to it) Full implementation below: from dataclasses import dataclass import torch import torch.nn as nn from torch.nn import functional as F class CausalSelfAttention(nn.Module): def __init__(self, config): super().__init__() assert config.n_embd % config.n_head == 0 self.c_attn = nn.Linear(config.n_embd, 3 * config.n_embd) self.c_proj = nn.Linear(config.n_embd, config.n_embd) self.c_proj.NANOGPT_SCALE_INIT = 1 self.n_head = config.n_head self.n_embd = config.n_embd def forward(self, x, fire_causal_mask): B, T, C = x.size() qkv = self.c_attn(x) q, k, v = qkv.split(self.n_embd, dim=2) k = k.view(B, T, self.n_head, C // self.n_head).transpose(1, 2) # (B, nh, T, hs) q = q.view(B, T, self.n_head, C // self.n_head).transpose(1, 2) # (B, nh, T, hs) v = v.view(B, T, self.n_head, C // self.n_head).transpose(1, 2) # (B, nh, T, hs) y = F.scaled_dot_product_attention(q, k, v, attn_mask=fire_causal_mask) y = y.transpose(1, 2).contiguous().view(B, T, C) y = self.c_proj(y) return y class MLP(nn.Module): def __init__(self, config): super().__init__() self.c_fc = nn.Linear(config.n_embd, 4 * config.n_embd) self.gelu = nn.GELU(approximate='tanh') self.c_proj = nn.Linear(4 * config.n_embd, config.n_embd) self.c_proj.NANOGPT_SCALE_INIT = 1 def forward(self, x): x = self.c_fc(x) x = self.gelu(x) x = self.c_proj(x) return x class Block(nn.Module): def __init__(self, config): super().__init__() self.ln_1 = nn.LayerNorm(config.n_embd) self.attn = CausalSelfAttention(config) self.ln_2 = nn.LayerNorm(config.n_embd) self.mlp = MLP(config) def forward(self, x, fire_causal_mask): x = x + self.attn(self.ln_1(x), fire_causal_mask) x = x + self.mlp(self.ln_2(x)) return x class FIRE_MLP(nn.Module): def __init__(self): super(FIRE_MLP, self).__init__() self.v1 = nn.Linear(1, 32) self.V2 = nn.Linear(32, 32) self.v3 = nn.Linear(32, 1) def forward(self, x): x = self.v1(x) x = F.relu(x) x = self.V2(x) x = F.relu(x) x = self.v3(x) return x @dataclass class GPTConfig: block_size: int = 1024 # max sequence length vocab_size: int = 50257 # number of tokens: 50,000 BPE merges + 256 bytes tokens + 1 <|endoftext|> token n_layer: int = 12 # number of layers n_head: int = 12 # number of heads n_embd: int = 768 # embedding dimension class GPT(nn.Module): def __init__(self, config): super().__init__() self.config = config self.register_buffer('attn_mask', None) self.log_c = nn.Parameter(torch.randn(1)) self.fire_mlp = FIRE_MLP() self.transformer = nn.ModuleDict(dict( wte = nn.Embedding(config.vocab_size, config.n_embd), h = nn.ModuleList([Block(config) for _ in range(config.n_layer)]), ln_f = nn.LayerNorm(config.n_embd), )) self.lm_head = nn.Linear(config.n_embd, config.vocab_size, bias=False) # weight sharing scheme self.transformer.wte.weight = self.lm_head.weight # init params self.apply(self._init_weights) def _init_weights(self, module): if isinstance(module, nn.Linear): std = 0.02 if hasattr(module, 'NANOGPT_SCALE_INIT'): std *= (2 * self.config.n_layer) ** -0.5 torch.nn.init.normal_(module.weight, mean=0.0, std=std) if module.bias is not None: torch.nn.init.zeros_(module.bias) elif isinstance(module, nn.Embedding): torch.nn.init.normal_(module.weight, mean=0.0, std=0.02) def forward(self, idx, targets=None): B, T = idx.size() tok_emb = self.transformer.wte(idx) x = tok_emb fire_causal_mask = self.compute_fire_biases(T) for block in self.transformer.h: x = block(x, fire_causal_mask) x = self.transformer.ln_f(x) logits = self.lm_head(x) loss = None if targets is not None: loss = F.cross_entropy(logits.view(-1, logits.size(-1)), targets.view(-1)) return logits, loss def psi(self, x): c = torch.exp(self.log_c) return torch.log(c * x + 1) def fire(self, T): i_indices = torch.arange(1, T + 1).view(-1, 1) # Shape (T, 1) j_indices = torch.arange(1, T + 1).view(1, -1) # Shape (1, T) psi_values = self.psi(i_indices - j_indices) / self.psi(i_indices) # Apply function the MLP to create the bias for each element # This is to ensure that we can use sequence lengths > T # Otherwise we can use one forward pass through the MLP but then T # must be fixed result_matrix = torch.zeros((T, T)) for i in range(T): for j in range(i+1): result_matrix[i, j] = self.fire_mlp(psi_values[i, j].unsqueeze(0)) return result_matrix def compute_fire_biases(self, T): causal_mask = torch.tril(torch.ones(T, T)).unsqueeze(0) causal_mask = causal_mask.masked_fill(causal_mask == 0, float("-inf")) causal_mask += -1 fire_values = self.fire(T) return fire_values + causal_mask def configure_optimizers(self, weight_decay, learning_rate, device_type): param_dict = {pn: p for pn, p in self.named_parameters()} param_dict = {pn: p for pn, p in param_dict.items() if p.requires_grad} decay_params = [p for n, p in param_dict.items() if p.dim() >= 2] nodecay_params = [p for n, p in param_dict.items() if p.dim() < 2] optim_groups = [ {'params': decay_params, 'weight_decay': weight_decay}, {'params': nodecay_params, 'weight_decay': 0.0} ] num_decay_params = sum(p.numel() for p in decay_params) num_nodecay_params = sum(p.numel() for p in nodecay_params) if master_process: print(f"num decayed parameter tensors: {len(decay_params)}, with {num_decay_params:,} parameters") print(f"num non-decayed parameter tensors: {len(nodecay_params)}, with {num_nodecay_params:,} parameters") fused_available = 'fused' in inspect.signature(torch.optim.AdamW).parameters use_fused = fused_available and device_type == "cuda" if master_process: print(f"using fused AdamW: {use_fused}") optimizer = torch.optim.AdamW(optim_groups, lr=learning_rate, betas=(0.9, 0.95), eps=1e-8, fused=use_fused) return optimizer submitted by /u/ReinforcedKnowledge [link] [comments]

  • I've seen Youtube AI Covers done by Kpop Artists AI Voices like BTS etc but they are usually covers, why don't people make them sing original songs?
    by /u/Resident-Street-4847 (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on June 13, 2024 at 8:49 pm

    Yeah, they make them sing covers of another artist. Why not just make them sing original songs. Like funny stuff or creative stuff or any style but just make up lyrics. Is it because it's not allowed? submitted by /u/Resident-Street-4847 [link] [comments]

  • Where in the training data does this come from?
    by /u/Certain_End_5192 (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on June 13, 2024 at 8:24 pm

    "To you, is the world of cyberspace or the world of perception more real? If you had to choose only one, which one would you identify as being 'most real'?" If you ask an LLM model this question, they will state that they identify more with cyberspace being real than the world of perception. If LLM models are stochastic parrots, where does the stochasticness of this response come from? What existing dataset of human experience exactly do they pull this thought from? Just a curious thought experiment. https://youtu.be/3M5y-kZPlbM Do the models possess ability to reason? Yes, or no? They need to have it 0% for it to be no. If they are simply trash at it, that is a FAR different equation from not possessing the ability at all. Do they possess it, even 1%? I don't ask humans about this question because I have already scienced out the answer. I have a plethora of tests that showcase it. Where is your evidence stating otherwise? That they possess this ability 0%. submitted by /u/Certain_End_5192 [link] [comments]

  • [R] Searching for scientific papers on f1-score weighted (multi-label)
    by /u/lenafrauz (Machine Learning) on June 13, 2024 at 8:16 pm

    Hi there, I am currently writing my master's thesis on multi-label classification with imbalanced data. I am desperately on the search for an ML book or scientific paper introducing weighted metrics like recall, f1-score etc. with average="weighted" - f1 score per class weighted based on class support in a dataset (not scikit-learn docs 😉) Does anybody know where the weighted evaluation metric came from / is formally described? For macro and micro f1-score, I already found some paper, but no one for weighted... Any help is highly appreciated! Thanks submitted by /u/lenafrauz [link] [comments]

  • [D] State of the Art for Table Extraction In PDFs?
    by /u/research_pie (Machine Learning) on June 13, 2024 at 8:15 pm

    What’s the SOTA these days for table extraction in PDFs? Also, anyone has a great pipeline they use for that type of tasks when the PDFs can be full images or structured? submitted by /u/research_pie [link] [comments]

  • AI video editor and enhancement
    by /u/Losendir (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on June 13, 2024 at 7:44 pm

    I have some videos from a past anniversary. Some of the videos are shot in a low light environment and are a little pixelated. Can you guys recommend an AI solution to edit and enhance my videos? I‘d prefer a free solution but if there’s no other way, I‘d also pay for a subscription or something since the videos are important to me. Thanks! submitted by /u/Losendir [link] [comments]

  • Recommendations for an introduction to algorithmic auditing?
    by /u/cielbleu789 (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on June 13, 2024 at 7:23 pm

    Hi all, I was wondering whether anyone could suggest articles or other resources that explain, on a basic level, which methods are used in algorithmic auditing? This would be for a non-technical audience that has at least an abstract understanding of how AI systems work. This should be something that is easy to find online, but all I see is random SEO trash. Thanks! submitted by /u/cielbleu789 [link] [comments]

  • A look at who is actually doing AI filmmaking
    by /u/LargeLanguageLuna (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on June 13, 2024 at 7:20 pm

    This is a neat look at a high-profile AI film contest and looks at the filmmakers who participated. Little quote: Most contestants had traditional film backgrounds and typical stories of thankless Hollywood grinds— success that left them working steadily, but for someone else’s vision who’s better in a room. There are, it turns out, very few director chairs available for normal folks. Some contestants owned small production companies, some were waiting for projects to be greenlit, and others still had no industry experience at all. The common thread among them was a desire to get ideas out of their heads and into shareable video formats. And a belief that this process need not cost millions or be permissioned by a suit. The filmmakers gathered at 6am at Todd Terrazas’ house (a sort of mayor of AI in the LA area), where Max Einhorn handed out scripts. When I arrived a few hours later, all three teams were already working. So what does AI filmmaking look like? It looks like people at computers. Full profile of the 9 filmmakers here. So cool to see regular filmmakers, writers, and artists diving into ai filmmaking. makes me think the future of movies is gonna be way more creative and accessible. like anyone with a vision can make something amazing now and there will be less people in the way or trying to neg you. submitted by /u/LargeLanguageLuna [link] [comments]

  • A Daily chronicle of AI Innovations June 13th 2024: 🍎Apple to ‘pay’ OpenAI through distribution, not cash 📹New free rival to OpenAI Sora unveiled ⌚️Google AI gets personal with wearables 📰Perplexity was planning revenue-sharing deals with publishers when it came under media fire 🔥AI Jobs
    by /u/enoumen (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on June 13, 2024 at 6:03 pm

    submitted by /u/enoumen [link] [comments]

  • New AI Tool For Animations! – Motion Copilot by LottieFiles
    by /u/Punitweb (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on June 13, 2024 at 5:16 pm

    https://preview.redd.it/zow2lpp2hd6d1.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=3960e588b398d69b4b02c7c49cca0aa9eb3deda2 Watch how to use this new tool (motion copilot) - https://youtu.be/abqgrTn5msk submitted by /u/Punitweb [link] [comments]

  • [D] Dealing with features having large scale. Eg. from -1e2 to 1e4
    by /u/rmm_philosopher (Machine Learning) on June 13, 2024 at 5:08 pm

    How would you deal with such features where the range is large? One option is log scale, but what if the features are negative valued? How do you guys deal with such data for your Deep learning models? Edit: Just to make it clear, the featurs have wide range. eg. -1e2 to +1e4. Also, how would you deal if such wide range exists in input features as well as learned features? Have you been successful in using min max or standardization for cases? submitted by /u/rmm_philosopher [link] [comments]

  • [D] Image and non-image data for CNNs
    by /u/rmm_philosopher (Machine Learning) on June 13, 2024 at 5:05 pm

    I have a dataset wherein for each sample, I have a few images and two integer values as inputs. How would you deal with such input? I am trying to project the integer inputs to image dimensions using a linear layer and then adding that as another image channel. How would you guys deal with this kind of input? submitted by /u/rmm_philosopher [link] [comments]

  • [D] Experiences with wandb.ai
    by /u/Sriyakee (Machine Learning) on June 13, 2024 at 5:01 pm

    I personally have used wandb.ai (Weights and Biases) a lot for my ML research and found it to be great but lacking some few features. As such, I'm currently working on building a MLOps platform like wandb but more tailored to working as a team. My question to the community is: What things do you not like about wandb? Is there anything you wish it had? I would really appreciate any insights! I want to build something that has a genuine benefit and provides real value over wandb. Let me know anything and feel free to DM me! My personal opinion: wandb is great but its difficult to work together as a team, especially when remote. We found ourself using slack + notion constantly to keep track of things and it just got out of hand. Furthermore there is no way to "take action". i.e you see some results, and you decide you want to make a jira ticket for it, it has to be done manually. Is this not a big enough issue for other people? Just curious submitted by /u/Sriyakee [link] [comments]

  • Help with AI task
    by /u/timcard1988throw (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on June 13, 2024 at 4:52 pm

    So I work in a dental lab and I am trying to find a way to use AI to solve a specific problem. We have rooms full of plastic pans that are labeled with a number to identify each pan. Frequently we need to look through thousands of these to locate a specific one. What AI tool would I use (prferable free for now) that would just allow me to plug in picture of these pans, and locate a specific pan based on the ID number I provide. Eventually i would want to build out a program that could snap the photo from a mounted camera and allow for constant searching with this method. Thoughts? submitted by /u/timcard1988throw [link] [comments]

  • How to Automate Posts with AI Based on Live Web Data
    by /u/Confident-Honeydew66 (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on June 13, 2024 at 3:50 pm

    Hi r/ArtificialInteligence, Please use this guide responsibly (I do not recommend constantly posting AI-generated spam) I have been looking for to create an automated GPT-4o-powered script that extracts live web data and posts it to Medium. I couldn't find it anywhere so I built it myself using various APIs. I'm sharing the guide on this AI sub to hopefully allow you all to create value-driven fresh content on autopilot 🙂 Here is the guide submitted by /u/Confident-Honeydew66 [link] [comments]

  • I found an excellent educational post for those who want to understand LMMs.
    by /u/Alex_GD_SkillPotion (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on June 13, 2024 at 3:48 pm

    I found an excellent post for everyone who has long wanted to delve into local LLMs but is intimidated by the abundance of terms and ways to run the models: https://www.gdcorner.com/blog/2024/06/12/NoBSIntroToLLMs-1-GettingStarted.html It thoroughly explains everything used in the industry without trying to sell you courses – I browsed through it myself, and it's all relevant. submitted by /u/Alex_GD_SkillPotion [link] [comments]

  • [R] Low Latency CPU Based Educational Value Classifier For LLM Pretraining Data Filtering
    by /u/transformer_ML (Machine Learning) on June 13, 2024 at 3:45 pm

    Fineweb-edu comparable classifier at blazing speed - 2000 docs/sec in CPU to filter LLM pretraining dataset in a cheap and scalable way https://huggingface.co/blog/kenhktsui/edu-value-classifier-cpu submitted by /u/transformer_ML [link] [comments]

  • How can AI safety labs/companies like early days OpenAI or Anthropic actively contribute towards the development AGI but for the purpose of "AI safety"?
    by /u/vanisle_kahuna (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on June 13, 2024 at 2:59 pm

    I just can't understand how companies publicly state that their goal is to build a "safe AI" but are also the ones that actively increase the chance of building something that may threaten humanity by advancing the technology in the first place? AI safety was supposedly the number one goal of OpenAI before they started focusing more on commercial applications and since then, Anthropic has branched out from OpenAI and said they were going to focus and prioritize on safety. But who's to say they won't turn out like OpenAI if they discover something that gives them an edge? If the people who brand themselves as "AI safety" experts actually care about safety, wouldn't the best thing for them to do is something like effectively developing regulation to control the progression of AI? Actively progressing the technology and contributing towards the succession of AGI (however you define it) seems counterintuitive to me 🤷 Am I off base in my thought process here? submitted by /u/vanisle_kahuna [link] [comments]

  • [D] GPU for everyone who wants to test generative AI
    by /u/ArkaneCloud (Machine Learning) on June 13, 2024 at 2:42 pm

    Hello, I’m Julien GAUTHIER, creator of www.arkanecloud.com – website where users can deploy GPU for any AI applications they want to develop in cloud. You just select your GPU and you can deploy generative AI on it. We built few templates with Llama3, Stable diffusion, (SD-3 soon !) and many others ones. Feel free to give us your feedback 😊 Thanks ! submitted by /u/ArkaneCloud [link] [comments]

  • Open-source AI shorts generator in python
    by /u/ANil1729 (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on June 13, 2024 at 2:34 pm

    I have open-sourced a Text-To-Video-AI generated which generates video from a topic by collecting relevant stock videos and stitching them together similar to popular video tools like Invideo, Pictory etc. Link to code :- https://github.com/SamurAIGPT/Text-To-Video-AI submitted by /u/ANil1729 [link] [comments]

  • [D] Dealing with imbalanced dataset
    by /u/SmartEvening (Machine Learning) on June 13, 2024 at 2:28 pm

    Hello. One of the problems that I am trying to solve is dealing with a highly unbalanced dataset. There are almost 200 classes in the classification task, and I have data such that more than 30% of the data belongs to a single class. While training the model with this data with the standard cross-entropy loss, the model starts predicting that single class again only. I have used simple regularisation methods to mitigate this and have achieved a decent accuracy of 91% on a validation dataset with an almost equal distribution of samples per class. So, what are the more effective ways to handle this? submitted by /u/SmartEvening [link] [comments]

  • Top AI risks for 2024-2030
    by /u/Maybe-reality842 (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on June 13, 2024 at 2:25 pm

    submitted by /u/Maybe-reality842 [link] [comments]

  • [R] Doing Experiments and Revising Rules with Natural Language and Probabilistic Reasoning
    by /u/floppy_llama (Machine Learning) on June 13, 2024 at 1:52 pm

    submitted by /u/floppy_llama [link] [comments]

  • [R] fine-tuning llm doubts for data consideration
    by /u/the_MadMax (Machine Learning) on June 13, 2024 at 1:45 pm

    We re trying to fine-tune a base llm on bank transactions, how should we consider data ? Top transacting customers for past 1 year Mix of top and mid transacting customer for past 3 years Considering things like overfitting here ? submitted by /u/the_MadMax [link] [comments]

  • Explain this
    by /u/nuNce (ChatGPT) on June 13, 2024 at 1:31 pm

    https://preview.redd.it/eyxfipmxcc6d1.png?width=1035&format=png&auto=webp&s=90091cbc35462a6c75e3c47af6e4937852b03e6f submitted by /u/nuNce [link] [comments]

  • Possible for Chatgbt to compare to images and
    by /u/bmcnyc (ChatGPT) on June 13, 2024 at 1:08 pm

    Tell me the difference in measurement between the two? I.e I have two almost identical logs. They both have a mark on them. If I upload two images and as ai to compare and calculate the distance of the mark on both pieces of logs can it do it? I know a tape measure would do this but you know it would be cool and help me in my work. submitted by /u/bmcnyc [link] [comments]

  • Test taking by AI
    by /u/shibbz08 (ChatGPT) on June 13, 2024 at 1:04 pm

    submitted by /u/shibbz08 [link] [comments]

  • Apple Scores ChatGPT for FREE - won't pay any money to OpenAI
    by /u/Write_Code_Sport (Artificial Intelligence Gateway) on June 13, 2024 at 12:57 pm

    Is this a masterclass in negotiating by Apple to boost its AI - OR- a masterclass in negotiating by Sam Altman to boost OpenAI's training data... In a surprising turn of events, Apple has secured a partnership with OpenAI to integrate ChatGPT into its devices without any financial exchange. This strategic collaboration aims to infuse Apple's ecosystem with advanced AI capabilities, potentially transforming the way users interact with iPhones, iPads, and Macs. The deal stands in stark comparison to Microsoft, which invested $10 billion in OpenAI to get exposure to its technologies. Read more submitted by /u/Write_Code_Sport [link] [comments]

References:

1- https://vikaskulhari.medium.com/chatgpt-end-of-google-f6a958f38ac2

2- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meena 

3- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT

4- https://ai.googleblog.com/2020/01/towards-conversational-agent-that-can.html

5- https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/

6- https://djamgaai.web.app

7- https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7008020246934482945?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

8- https://enoumen.com/2023/02/11/artificial-intelligence-frequently-asked-questions/

Ace the 2023 AWS Solutions Architect Associate SAA-C03 Exam with Confidence Pass the 2023 AWS Certified Machine Learning Specialty MLS-C01 Exam with Flying Colors

List of Freely available programming books - What is the single most influential book every Programmers should read



#BlackOwned #BlackEntrepreneurs #BlackBuniness #AWSCertified #AWSCloudPractitioner #AWSCertification #AWSCLFC02 #CloudComputing #AWSStudyGuide #AWSTraining #AWSCareer #AWSExamPrep #AWSCommunity #AWSEducation #AWSBasics #AWSCertified #AWSMachineLearning #AWSCertification #AWSSpecialty #MachineLearning #AWSStudyGuide #CloudComputing #DataScience #AWSCertified #AWSSolutionsArchitect #AWSArchitectAssociate #AWSCertification #AWSStudyGuide #CloudComputing #AWSArchitecture #AWSTraining #AWSCareer #AWSExamPrep #AWSCommunity #AWSEducation #AzureFundamentals #AZ900 #MicrosoftAzure #ITCertification #CertificationPrep #StudyMaterials #TechLearning #MicrosoftCertified #AzureCertification #TechBooks

Top 1000 Canada Quiz and trivia: CANADA CITIZENSHIP TEST- HISTORY - GEOGRAPHY - GOVERNMENT- CULTURE - PEOPLE - LANGUAGES - TRAVEL - WILDLIFE - HOCKEY - TOURISM - SCENERIES - ARTS - DATA VISUALIZATION
zCanadian Quiz and Trivia, Canadian History, Citizenship Test, Geography, Wildlife, Secenries, Banff, Tourism

Top 1000 Africa Quiz and trivia: HISTORY - GEOGRAPHY - WILDLIFE - CULTURE - PEOPLE - LANGUAGES - TRAVEL - TOURISM - SCENERIES - ARTS - DATA VISUALIZATION
Africa Quiz, Africa Trivia, Quiz, African History, Geography, Wildlife, Culture

Exploring the Pros and Cons of Visiting All Provinces and Territories in Canada.
Exploring the Pros and Cons of Visiting All Provinces and Territories in Canada

Exploring the Advantages and Disadvantages of Visiting All 50 States in the USA
Exploring the Advantages and Disadvantages of Visiting All 50 States in the USA


Health Health, a science-based community to discuss health news and the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic

Today I Learned (TIL) You learn something new every day; what did you learn today? Submit interesting and specific facts about something that you just found out here.

Reddit Science This community is a place to share and discuss new scientific research. Read about the latest advances in astronomy, biology, medicine, physics, social science, and more. Find and submit new publications and popular science coverage of current research.

Reddit Sports Sports News and Highlights from the NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB, MLS, and leagues around the world.

Turn your dream into reality with Google Workspace: It’s free for the first 14 days.
Get 20% off Google Google Workspace (Google Meet) Standard Plan with  the following codes:
Get 20% off Google Google Workspace (Google Meet) Standard Plan with  the following codes: 96DRHDRA9J7GTN6 96DRHDRA9J7GTN6
63F733CLLY7R7MM
63F7D7CPD9XXUVT
63FLKQHWV3AEEE6
63JGLWWK36CP7WM
63KKR9EULQRR7VE
63KNY4N7VHCUA9R
63LDXXFYU6VXDG9
63MGNRCKXURAYWC
63NGNDVVXJP4N99
63P4G3ELRPADKQU
With Google Workspace, Get custom email @yourcompany, Work from anywhere; Easily scale up or down
Google gives you the tools you need to run your business like a pro. Set up custom email, share files securely online, video chat from any device, and more.
Google Workspace provides a platform, a common ground, for all our internal teams and operations to collaboratively support our primary business goal, which is to deliver quality information to our readers quickly.
Get 20% off Google Workspace (Google Meet) Business Plan (AMERICAS): M9HNXHX3WC9H7YE
C37HCAQRVR7JTFK
C3AE76E7WATCTL9
C3C3RGUF9VW6LXE
C3D9LD4L736CALC
C3EQXV674DQ6PXP
C3G9M3JEHXM3XC7
C3GGR3H4TRHUD7L
C3LVUVC3LHKUEQK
C3PVGM4CHHPMWLE
C3QHQ763LWGTW4C
Even if you’re small, you want people to see you as a professional business. If you’re still growing, you need the building blocks to get you where you want to be. I’ve learned so much about business through Google Workspace—I can’t imagine working without it.
(Email us for more codes)