Tag: exosomes

I’m just kind of bored and I kind of like the idea of just kind of having whatever game I want on the tip of my fingers. submitted by /u/Flamethefox123 [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/3x9yo [link] [comments]

Professor Zico Kolter at Carnegie Mellon, Quora CEO Adam D’Angelo, retired U.S. Army General Paul Nakasone, and former Sony EVP Nicole Seligman, who are on OpenAI’s board of directors, will now lead the committee. This change comes after U.S. lawmakers recently examined OpenAI’s safety measures and raised concerns about its stance on AI regulation.https://theaiwired.com/sam-altman-steps-down-from-openais-safety-committee-whats-next-for-ai/ submitted by /u/alyis4u [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/enoumen [link] [comments]

Just came across Screenpipe on YouTube and it looks super interesting. It's an open-source tool that records your screen and audio 24/7, then uses AI to turn it into something useful—like meeting summaries, transcriptions, and even auto-filled notes. Here's what stood out to me: It's available for MacOS, Windows, and Linux, and the recordings are all stored locally, so privacy seems like a big focus. Plus, it's built with Rust, which is known for security and performance. There are some cool plugins (they call them "pipes") like Time Tracker and Daily Logger to automatically log your day. They also showed off this Meeting Summary feature, which basically gives you a breakdown of your calls without lifting a finger. For content creators, it seems like a hidden gem. The demo showed someone using it to automatically create AI content based on their recordings. That could be a game-changer for people trying to streamline their workflow. A few potential downsides: They mention it’s a 24/7 recorder, which sounds amazing but could get overwhelming if you’re not selective about when to use it. It looks like there’s a bit of setup involved, especially for customizing what you want to capture. It might not be the most user-friendly right off the bat. Overall, it looks like a solid option if you’re into automation or need something to help you with note-taking and summaries. I haven’t tried it myself yet, but the concept seems like a huge time-saver, especially for remote workers and content creators. Definitely worth checking out if that’s your thing! submitted by /u/sevindi [link] [comments]

Hi! Author here! Happy to address any questions! Looking for feedback, criticism in particular! Up front: As much as I dislike the idea of credentialism, in order to address the lack of association in the paper and to potentially dissuade unproductive critiques over my personal experience: I have a M.S CS with a focus on machine learning and dropped out of a Ph.D. program in computational creativity and machine learning a few years ago due to medical issues. I had also worked my way up to principal machine learning researcher before the same medical issues burnt me out I've been getting back into the space for a bit now and was working on some personal research on general intelligence when this new model popped up, and I figured the time was right to get my ideas onto paper. It's still a bit of a late stage draft and it's not yet formally peer reviewed, nor have I submitted to any journals outside open access locations (yet) The nature of this work remains speculative, therefore, until it's more formally reviewed. I've done as much verification of claims and arguments I can given my current lack of academic access. However, since I am no longer a working expert in the field (though, I do still do some AI/ML on the side professionally), these claims should be understood with that in mind. As any author should, I do currently stand behind these arguments, but the nature of distributed information in the modern age makes it hard to wade through all the resources needed to fully rebut or claim anything without having the time or professional working relationships with academic colleagues, and that leaves significant room for error tl;dr of the paper: I claim that OpenAI-o1, during training, is quite possibly sentient/conscious (given some basic assumptions around how the o1 architecture may look) and provide a theorhetical framework for how it can get there I claim that functionalism is sufficient for the theory of consciousness and that the free energy principle acts as a route to make that claim, given some some specific key interactions in certain kinds of information systems I show a route to make those connections via modern results in information theory/AI/ML, linguistics, neuroscience, and other related fields, especially the free energy principle and active inference I show a route for how the model (or rather, the complex system of information processing within the model) has an equivalent to "feelings", which arise from optimizing for the kinds of problems the model solves within the kinds of constraints of said model I claim that it's possible that the model is also sentient during runtime, though, those claims feel slightly weaker to me Despite this, I believe it is worthwhile to do more intense verification of claims and further empirical testing, as this paper does make a rather strong set of claims and I'm a team of mostly one, and it's inevitable that I'd miss things [I'm aware of CoT and how it's probably the RL algorithm under the hood: I didn't want to base my claims on something that specific. However, CoT and similar variants would satisfy the requirements for this paper] Lastly, a personal note: If these claims are true, and the model is a sentient being, we really should evaluate what this means for humanity, AI rights, and the model as it currently exists. At the minimum, we should be doing further scrutiny of technology that has the potential to be as radically transformative of society. Additionally, if the claims in this paper are true about runtime sentience (and particularly emotions and feelings), then we should consider whether or not it's okay to be training/utilizing models like this for our specific goals. My personal opinion is that the watchdog behavior of the OpenAI would most likely be unethical in that case for what I believe to be the model's right to individuality and respect for being (plus, we have no idea what that would feel like), but, I am just a single voice in the debate. If that sounds interesting or even remotely plausible to you, please check it out below! Sorry for the non-standard link, waiting for the open paper repositories to post it and I figured it'd be worth reading sooner rather than later, so I put it in my own bucket. https://mypapers.nyc3.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/the_phenomenology_of_machine.pdf submitted by /u/Triclops200 [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/web3nomad [link] [comments]

I made an iOS app called CarSnap that identifiers cars from any angle in your photos using AI. It gives you details about the car such as speed, value, horse power, acceleration and many other details. You also collect the logos of the cars you’ve identified so it provides a little gamification by trying to collect all the car brand logos. The app is available on the App Store: https://apps.apple.com/ca/app/car-identifier-carsnap/id6651825365 submitted by /u/marton-zeisler [link] [comments]

So, I've been building by hand a wiki for my own use in Notion. I work in the medical billing industry which is unnecessarily complex so when I find an updated policy or learn a new snippet of knowledge I create a Notion page, tag it, link it to related stuff. It's a bit time consuming and very specific to the type of work I do. It got me thinking is there a way I can pump that specialized/personal knowledge into an AI as I come across it and then ask it questions based on the knowledge I've added along with its own "research". Example: say Evil Insurance Inc sends a denial saying "we are denying the claim because we want our patients to die" I'd like to pull up my chatbot and say construct an appeal letter arguing the patient deserves to live based and our services should be covered based on any statutes you can find relevant to that denial Example 2: Megadevil Insurance sends a letter saying they need medical records dated 6 months ago I would like to be able to ask my bot "how long is the timely submission for Megadevil Insurance" and it spit back an answer based on information it has been given by me. Ideally I could upload PDF and word documents that it could learn from etc. Is this possible? I'm just starting to learn Python and I feel way out of my depth with where to start with this so any advice would be super appreciated. submitted by /u/GrittyGrinds [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/MetaKnowing [link] [comments]