Tag: Regenerative Medicine

Anyone built a RAG? What were the requirements? Seems like everyone needs one. So why not show what that might look like? You got a badass requirements doc? Post it. Lemee see. submitted by /u/YellowVeloFeline [link] [comments]

Okay so with the pace things are going what are your guys predictions for the future of ai? I think it will takeover most jobs that involve a computer as well ss very robotic manual labor jobs/warehouse jobs/fast food. However I think anyone in a trade will thrive. I do think it will eventually get to a point where it does gain self awareness and then things might get messy. It’s hard to think it won’t eventually. submitted by /u/NewPainting8224 [link] [comments]

Sharing event (online and in-person for whoever is in Portland) Title: Artificial Superintelligence & Its Impact to Humanity Speakers: Intel Labs, GEA, SSRF, The Tech Arena, D'Angelo + Morris Date: May 23rd, 2024 from 5pm PST to 9pm PST Description: This event goes beyond the current hype of LLMs. Speakers will share the latest in advanced research aiming to get us to AGI/ASI. A panel will discuss the merits of the research and its short-term impact on business and long-term impact on the human civilization. The event is organized by GEA, a non-profit research organization. This event is a research event. No product or company pitches are permitted. Online tickets: $15 In-Person: $39.99 (standard ticket) to $99.99 (includes books and open bar for networking session) More info + tickets: https://cerebralsips.com/pdx submitted by /u/mshita [link] [comments]

I recently started working at a design engineering construction company, medium sized business, as an IT technician. I was asking around the company about peoples experience with ai, and word got up to the bosses and now im stepping up to put in place processes and establishing an ai posture I have a few years experience running llm's locally, playing with prompts, and just keeping up to date in general. I spent the last few weeks playing around with various MS offerings (copilot studio, to azure openai studio, to some github projects like microsoft information assistant and azure-search-openai-demo on azure to put together a proof of concept chatbot for some internal knowledge. That's working well but now i need to move onto statistical analysis/automated monitoring of outputs as prompt changes/new data is added. I have a few ai 'power user' champions at high levels of the company that will be part of the task force, but other than that, knowledge and use of ai in the company is very lacking. I feel like we are in a great position, with the company willing to adopt the posture while also being well tempered in their expectations of whats currently available. Some ideas i have for getting started is to put together some documentation/processes for evaluating new use cases and studying the risk/benefit, and process for measuring success. Possibly also putting together a survey to send out to all staff to get an idea of current usage/knowledge. And then just start putting together some curated training material to get people that are interested basically starting to get used to prompting and building the skills of interacting with ai in general. I've downloaded Microsoft Loop and set up a group for the task force to collaborate and im thinking ill put one together for the end users to get access to tips and share their findings/uses with other staff. I would love any input from anyone thats gone through something similar. Any advice would be much appreciated! I'm thinking more long-term here, as much as the company obviously wants to see some results sooner than later, they know this is a big shift and its best to take your time and do it right. submitted by /u/Pale-Philosopher-943 [link] [comments]

First off, let me sum up my knowledge of AI: I have decades of experience working with exec level members large enterprise corporations in the IT field. I've been retired for a few years and only started following AI over the last year or so, as a hobby. I use Chat GPT or Copilot occasionally and have SDXL installed locally to dabble in some hobby image generation projects. Amazing stuff. Based on all the hype around Open AI staff departures, it sounds like there is a lot of fear around AI being turned lose to have potential damaging outcomes, without proper oversight. It is a legitimate fear, just like with any industry. But with any industry, oversight really should come from a governing body that can oversee ALL entities involved in that industry and NOT be the responsibility of the one currently at the forefront of it all. Do we leave it up to big pharma to decide what safety is needed in a new drug? Do we leave it up to oil companies to determine where they can drill, or car companies to decide what amount of pollution is ok? So why not let our governments do their job - which they are working towards now - to create the safety and ethics guidelines for Open AI and all the others to follow? I'm certain they are in discussions with Open AI and other major contributors to develop the initial framework and it will keep growing from there. Open AI may have the spotlight right now, but with almost all emerging technologies, the greatest advancements usually come from some small, unknown source that stumbles onto something incredible. They are too small to afford having their own team dedicated to ethics. All their focus is on creating the next big thing, so that is where the danger will come from. Those small startups and naturally all the devious users that are looking for ways to do harm to others. So when I see Open AI shuttering those departments or those people exiting for other opportunities, it just seems like the normal flow of business to me. Is this department adding $$ to our bottom line? No? Then let's consider our options. I think this may not be a popular point of view, but I honestly believe it is the inevitable evolution of how safety and ethics in AI will be handled in the future. (I wrote this without the use of any AI or even spell checkers and I am not an AGI trying to pave my way to global domination) submitted by /u/AsheronLives [link] [comments]

I needed to find a combination of numbers within a defined list of numbers that would add up to a specific value. I first asked ChatGPT-4o and it actually was having trouble with it. I then tried ChatGPT-4 and I was provided the correct answer within 10 seconds on the first request. Today while updating some apps I saw the latest AI tool from Google, which is now named Gemini. Considering the horrible start Google has to the AI battle and how focused they were on AI at Google I/O earlier this week, I decided to give it a try on a straight forward comparison. I had high hopes considering they felt it was new and improved enough to not even share the same name as Bard, but the results were...well, they are worth seeing for yourself...... Gemini Conversation: https://gemini.google.com/share/182898f57e86 submitted by /u/gafana [link] [comments]

A man's value in a capitalistic system is his labor. Once the need for labor in the west drops by 30/50/70/90% (depends on your degree of doomerism related to automation) then what is the need for this amount of people? Would it not be more profitable for this system to reduce the overall population by the same percentage? Without jobs these excess people can't consume so they bring nothing to the circulation. So they either become beggars of the state receiving UBI (optimistic) or they're allowed to starve due to this reduced need for workforce. People always bring up industrialization as counter example but it's a bad analogy imo. Industrialization caused restructurization of labor, not it's disappearance (and even then it was a painful transition which lowered quality of life arguably until second industrial revolution). After all the entire point of automation is to reduce need for human labor so I don't see how disappearing jobs are supposed to create equal amount of jobs in other/new sectors. I struggle to see any version of the future where we don't get fucked over by this tech (assuming it progresses to this level) until some point in the future where enough of us have died and the population level dropped enough to match the new order's reduced need for the number of human workers. submitted by /u/well-regarded-regard [link] [comments]

I made a Google Doc with lots of information on AI and its ethics and capabilities to defend it. Check it out here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15myK_6eTxEPuKnDi5krjBM_0jrv3GELs8TGmqOYBvug/ I’m looking for more information and arguments to add to it. This can include research papers on AI, articles, quotes from experts, logical reasoning, or anything else you think will help. Feel free to send it in the comments or DM me. submitted by /u/Which-Tomato-8646 [link] [comments]

Hey everyone, I’m currently working on a project for a client that requires 4 large csvs to be parsed through a GenAI model and then for users to be able to interact with the model. The total token size is around 5million tokens. I’ve tried Azure OpenAI assistants and chat apis… honestly I’m not keen. The models don’t interact well with the data as well, and they hallucinate parts of the datasets. Does anyone have any alternative suggestions, it will need to be a secure service such as AWS or even open source Thanks! submitted by /u/mostcritisedcritic [link] [comments]

I mean I worry about A.I. not being of much use to people with low intelligence but it occurs to me that highly-positioned folks with power would be at that other extreme. They'd still want to cultivate ways to undermine systems that seek to level the playing field. Like no more "white collar" crime; all crooks go to the same shitty jail and eat wack food. No more pricy lawyers getting you off for committing a more creative version of an average man's crime. Wouldn't they just promote systems that maintain the status quo? How does A.I. get beyond that when it's created by people? submitted by /u/heavensdumptruck [link] [comments]